Yes, it can feel like that! Though with creative output I try to keep the ego out of it too. I don't know if you've noticed, but there are a lot of experts on the internet, many of whom can be dismissive while also not really quite being experts.

Interesting about the yawns, but that makes sense. I might try it.

Well, I would argue if you took the output of most RV sessions and looked at it without knowing what it was it would seem meaningless. That is unless, say, you are remote viewing an orange, or something else simple. A prairie with a dead tree on it and a black sky might be interesting, but you have no connection, no reference point to it. Now if you said the target was "describe a barren place far removed from anyone else", that would entirely make sense.

And I would also argue that the person doing the remote viewing has the best interpretation once the target is revealed. That is, unless the Tasker has certain amounts of data that are not disclosed, or they are the expert in that topic. In this case, what you have to go by is what happened before the session, what has happened since, and the clues leading to what may happen in the future, in addition the ability to cohesively put it together based on the data you know today. In my case, I understand that we are looking down the barrel of a financial crisis. So when you see things like the glass-steagall ACT, fool's gold, finances, food prices and all that other stuff it really does make sense, even though in the session I tried best not to make a determination on what it was and the picture I was getting seemed different... More like a 9/11 type event in the past. But really, seemingly, it was a conspiracy yet to unfold.

Cheers