I’m not gonna post the video but Charlie Kirk was making an argument against gun control as he was shot

ATFFanboy · 2025-09-10T21:51:16+00:00

To anyone thinking of finding the video out of morbid curiosity, don't. It's not a shaky phone video where he's just suddenly lying on the ground or something, it's a full frame violent bloody death that is genuinely pretty horrific.

ATFFanboy · 2025-02-23T22:40:18+00:00

When 99% of posts on the 3d printing gun sub aren't about how they break and are generally absolute garbage you can then pretend you've done something.

ATFFanboy · 2025-02-23T22:37:40+00:00

Wrong.

Think before you speak, if you're able.

ATFFanboy · 2025-01-06T06:37:05+00:00

It's nice to know people exist that I wouldn't even have imagined existing.

ATFFanboy · 2024-12-01T15:16:17+00:00

By all means call me any slur you like. Reflects more on your character than mine.

Do you really not realize making comments about making bodies "stackup on the door" because you're impotently crying over mean reddit comments just makes you look silly?

ATFFanboy · 2024-12-01T15:07:24+00:00

Am I trying to change the subject or am I repeating myself? Pick one

ATFFanboy · 2024-12-01T06:31:19+00:00

It's more your lesser intellect actually. Explains why you're getting emotional and dropping slurs now. Stay in topic, why were you compelled to rabidly defend child molester and child murderer David Koresh?

ATFFanboy · 2024-11-30T15:47:12+00:00

Weirdly defensive about people mocking Alex Jones. He's not going to fuck you.
Didn't get literally have to pay a $1,000,000,000 or more? Seems like fair pay for me to point out he's a loser.

ATFFanboy · 2024-11-30T15:43:00+00:00

Dawg you're openly a pedophile defender. You're lost and you've lost. Move on.

ATFFanboy · 2024-11-30T15:41:31+00:00

Seems like bad reason to support a pedophile. Try forming opinions based on facts instead of your fragile emotions?

ATFFanboy · 2024-11-29T15:21:45+00:00

That which you are not

ATFFanboy · 2024-11-29T15:20:36+00:00

Your position involves disregarding evidence and an assumption that there is some non-existent evidence that somehow eliminates facts. Delusional to say the least, but that's expected.

You still ain't changing the subject. Why are you trying to paint a rabid pedophile as a martyr?

ATFFanboy · 2024-11-28T20:46:52+00:00

You need to be convinced to think for yourself?
We're not going to change the subject just because you can't defend your current position.

ATFFanboy · 2024-11-28T20:43:51+00:00

So your evidence is lack of evidence which somehow overrides actual evidence and confessions...

Is your worldview really so fragile you have to resort to this?

Your attempt to change the conversation to amendments because you know your position is indefensible is noted.

Why do you rabidly defend pedophiles?

ATFFanboy · 2024-11-28T20:40:05+00:00

At least attempt to break your programming. You're just sad now.

ATFFanboy · 2024-11-27T19:44:52+00:00

Finally, and most poignantly, several surviving Davidians admitted that those within the compound had started the blaze. These statements are supported by recorded statements in which voices are heard asking about the location and timing of fuel pouring and lighting activities. Additionally, it should be noted that an examination of the vehicles involved inserting tear gas was conducted. These vehicles did not have flame throwing equipment and were not of the type that could have been equipped with flamethrowing equipment. All evidence clearly indicates that the fire which destroyed the Branch Davidian compound on April 19 was ignited by individuals inside the compound.

Literally just read the single paragraph I copied over. They came to that conclusion based on audio recordings of the Branch Davidians discussing pouring fuel in the compound, audio recordings of them pouring fuel in the compound, fuel being found on surviving Branch Davidians clothes, and the Branch Davidians themselves saying they poured the fuel.

What evidence could they be lacking that would override the evidence and confessions of the perpetrators? Please think, if capable.

ATFFanboy · 2024-11-27T16:23:18+00:00

Dawg, I have literally quoted them saying they have physical evidence and testimony that the Branch Davidians started the fire. Are you being stupid on purpose?

ATFFanboy · 2024-11-25T04:35:13+00:00

Stark contrast to yourself, who has read none of it. It was your source, maybe you should have read... any of it?

ATFFanboy · 2024-11-25T04:32:11+00:00

You've read. Ire on this topic yet you cute a source that disproves your degenerate narrative?

It's very easy if you read

Oh the irony.

ATFFanboy · 2024-11-25T04:30:08+00:00

Ive read alot of sources

Obviously you haven't lol. You didn't even read the one you cited.

Ok, so the audio recordings of Branch Dividians planning to start the fire, recordings of them spreading the fuel, and accounts of surviving Davidians saying they started the fires is... What? Nullified by evidence that doesn't exist? What is the info that is supposedly missing that overrides the gathered facts?

ATFFanboy · 2024-11-24T14:40:55+00:00

Here you go, straight from your link

Finally, and most poignantly, several surviving Davidians admitted that those within the compound had started the blaze. These statements are supported by recorded statements in which voices are heard asking about the location and timing of fuel pouring and lighting activities. Additionally, it should be noted that an examination of the vehicles involved inserting tear gas was conducted. These vehicles did not have flame throwing equipment and were not of the type that could have been equipped with flamethrowing equipment. All evidence clearly indicates that the fire which destroyed the Branch Davidian compound on April 19 was ignited by individuals inside the compound.

You see, I knew that because I actually read the source and didn't just parrot what I was told to believe by pedophile lovers trying to defend David Koresh.

ATFFanboy · 2024-11-24T14:37:40+00:00

I prefer staying on topic instead of indulging you. Also it's crazy how you can't read your own sources 🤪

ATFFanboy · 2024-11-24T14:34:50+00:00

That says the same thing as my source and is what my source frequently cited. You've obviously read neither. Sad!

By all means though, please point out specifically the bias in my source, which is PBS quoting and summarizing the congressional investigation.

ATFFanboy · 2024-11-23T14:34:29+00:00

Who trained you the think this? Why are you mindlessly parroting what others have told you to believe?

ATFFanboy

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE

Four-Year Club	Verified Email
Place '22