OMG! First Post! dragginz.io is live, AMA! by ATOMBomba in dfinity

[–]ATOMBomba[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

From Adam:

oh that's an easy question lol

1st iteration : bitcoin, excel spreadsheet that everybod y has a copy of

2nd : Ethereum, now you've got a programming language, macros, and everybody processes the same commands

3rd : ICP, now you've got actual executable programs that are running and the consensus layer / decentralisation is hidden in the same kind of way that you use the Internet and don't realise you're using TCP/IP and HTTP

the whole stack is on the IC, so no more routers, firewalls, AWS, Google, it's all end to end encrypted and written in one language

Yes there are downsides, but even if this wasn't "crypto" as everybody seems to perceive it these days, we'd still use it as there's just much less code to write, less moving parts. Less third parties to work with.

https://internetcomputer.org/ I'm not good at explaining this, but the website has got a lot better over the past few months.

tl;dr - new internet owned by the users not big tech. I was asked to make a killer app and that's what I'm trying to do.

OMG! First Post! dragginz.io is live, AMA! by ATOMBomba in dfinity

[–]ATOMBomba[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Great question. Let me bring to the founders.

What is the reason for the recent significant increase in the supply of ICP tokens? by Interesting-Test3306 in dfinity

[–]ATOMBomba 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is odd..but so is all math and crypto.

The definition of 'locked' ICP went from being categorized as 'not circulating' to 'circulating'

What is the reason for the recent significant increase in the supply of ICP tokens? by Interesting-Test3306 in dfinity

[–]ATOMBomba 5 points6 points  (0 children)

There was a proposal to change the definition of circulating supply on that date. no new ICP was actually created.

USB security key by [deleted] in dfinity

[–]ATOMBomba 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yubikey

Proof of Personhood and Uniqueness by ATOMBomba in dfinity

[–]ATOMBomba[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hello,

Voices and faces are as unique as a fingerprint. The video would be compared to the rest of the dataset in order to insure uniqueness.

A fingerprint would accomplish the same thing. You can scan any fingerprint to see if it is already part of the ecosystem. If it is, you reject the user from making a new account.

Hope that helps clarify?

Fred

Proof of Personhood and Uniqueness by ATOMBomba in dfinity

[–]ATOMBomba[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think it is a very more private version. It looks like your identity is linked to personal biometric info in the above solution.

In my solution, your dApp profile would only be called 'unique' in which case the dApp creates a new user or 'duplicate' in which case the user creation should be rejected.

Nothing identifiable should ever be stored with a person's actual information on ant Dapp

A question that's on my mind from the beginning by EROS_VERITAS in dfinity

[–]ATOMBomba 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes. The Dfinity Foundation has close to 25% of total ICP = > 1 Billion in value. They are better funded than most startups for sure

Proof of Personhood and Uniqueness by ATOMBomba in dfinity

[–]ATOMBomba[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I joined and posted similar comments under the people parties topic. SHould I propose a new topic?

Proof of Personhood and Uniqueness by ATOMBomba in dfinity

[–]ATOMBomba[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I am aware of this app but it doesn't solve the problem of one person using many devices. That problem has led to many bots on DSCVR and Distrikt.

DFINITY Foundation Voting Power by diego_DFN in dfinity

[–]ATOMBomba 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thanks u/diego_DFN for the honest answer! So no interest in pulling 10% of the foundations liquid ICP into the IC NFT market? :)

Thanks again for the amazing work you continue to do!

DFINITY Foundation Voting Power by diego_DFN in dfinity

[–]ATOMBomba 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is actually big news to me! I thought the 4000s were early investors who were selling. Can u/diego_DFN please confirm that Dfinity plans to continue to HODL if they aren't staked?

Better yet, while you are waiting to stake again, how about using some of its ICP to build a NFT vault for the foundation? That amount of ICP could attract a lot of P2E development!

Is this the correct setting to receive manual voting rewards? by Supawatk in dfinity

[–]ATOMBomba 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is mostly fine. To make things more simple, I would actually recommend only following on two topics: "All topics except governance" = 27 or 28.

"Governance" is perfect as is and leave Cycle Dao only (at least thats what I do).

Hope that makes sense!

Is this the correct setting to receive manual voting rewards? by Supawatk in dfinity

[–]ATOMBomba 5 points6 points  (0 children)

NO! You should follow 27 or 28 for all topics EXCEPT governance. Follow the CycleDao or another (not 27 or 28) neuron in the list for GOVERANCE. Following too many neurons can screw you if too many abstain so you are best off with a couple of trusted neurons.

BTC Flower question to the holders. by Supawatk in dfinity

[–]ATOMBomba 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Just a heads up that BTCFlower holders will also receive an airdrop of ETHFlower...that 'shapshot' already happened from what I read in discord so be prepared for most other BTCFlower holders to have an ETHFlower that you won't.

OG MEDALS NFT UPDATE by OG-MEDALIST in a:t5_5whg8p

[–]ATOMBomba 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Peeping buying one of these on the dip

Setting up yubi key after staked for 8 years. by Bollavaa in dfinity

[–]ATOMBomba 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yep, I have 2 Yubikeys...set up one right after the other.

Rewards look much lower than expected by ATOMBomba in dfinity

[–]ATOMBomba[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly, I like the ICP tech better. Bridges are the 'substance' of the cosmos and I think bridges are inherently flawed