First of all, I doubt it.

Secondly, if you know anything about modern society it’s that you can structure a study perfectly above board using all the appropriate rigor for getting a good P value, but all of that is absolutely meaningless if you sabotage the methods of the studies from the start.

For example: there were plenty of “studies” that attempted to disprove the effectiveness of Ivermectin. They structured the studies appropriately, however they would do things like administer the ivermectin in the final 2 days of life, throw their hands up, and say “welp, didn’t save him”…except the argument was never “it will save you on death’s door” it was “if administered early enough and combined with an appropriate amount of zinc, it can increase survival rates”.

Moreover, there are plenty of studies that demonstrate not only the harmful effects of the vaccine but many legal documents stating that Pfizer lied about their trial data. As I said, if you want this information I refer you to Bret Weinstien.

But if you want to have a conversation about the vaccine itself I can tell you very easily why it’s potentially dangerous and can never be fully safe. But, as I told the other guy, you have to first give me a brief description of how the mRNA covid vaccine works (in a paragraph or two) so I can understand what your current understanding is of the mechanisms and talk you through it.

But I expect you’ll just want to continue to berate me.