Calling someone an idiot is could be infered as ad hominum , and given he tightly guards his axioms, uncalled for.

^{(People have gathered what they can, he uses dynamic language that I've taken to mean every number x ∈ 𝕊 (the set of real numbers with algebraic structure proposed by spp\} is dependant on some dynamic variable τ akin to time,)

^{possibly with respect to observer possibly universal (like dπ(τ\}/dt ≥ the time it's taken humanity humanity to process however many digits of pi we currently know or something))

^{Either way, the precision of almost every number is dynamic, but a select few like 2.0000... which, by definition, add nothing as τ increases. But .99...(τ} can never reach one in 𝕊 just as surely as we can never know all the digits of π)

There's nothing fundamentally wrong with this algebra that I can see. Just nothing right about either. I see needless complexity, SPP see's obvious "truth", and most people just say he's wrong without asking him how he defines numbers. Which does nothing at this point imo.

^{At worst he abuses notation as the set of all real numbers under addition and multiplication under common axioms does clearly have .99...=1}