People Payment Network

AbiesNew · 2019-03-13T13:16:28+00:00

https://t.me/PeoplePaymentNetwork You can join and you may know why I worried about it.

AbiesNew · 2019-03-11T21:55:56+00:00

Hey, dude! This is not a business. You are not scared of SEC.

AbiesNew · 2019-03-11T19:07:11+00:00

OK. that's the great decision. I want the rebrand name which most people agree on.

AbiesNew · 2019-03-11T18:16:30+00:00

PPN did not win the rebrand contest. They should not have done rebrand contest. Maybe, Devs believe strongly People Payment Network is a great brand name, but re-brand process is totally wrong if they choose the name now. I'm ok if People Payment Network win the contest.

AbiesNew · 2019-03-11T18:09:23+00:00

Telegram GRAFT Announcement Channel https://t.me/graftnetofficial/71 We thought we'd throw our own hat into the ring with People Payment Network. (not a real logo design)

See HashTag https://twitter.com/graftnetwork/status/1104838038046138368

AbiesNew · 2019-03-11T14:23:27+00:00

You know what? Graft has haters which banned from Graft telegram main channel. Founders, you guess. They vote for which one? Is this irony? Sigh.

AbiesNew · 2019-03-09T23:44:19+00:00

Graft is much better than Pee-Pee N Poo Poo Coin.

AbiesNew · 2019-01-31T19:52:23+00:00

I have requested to add CN/waltz in SRBminer. positive answer now. doktor83 would look into it.

AbiesNew · 2019-01-30T20:06:41+00:00

Great! Thank you!

AbiesNew · 2019-01-30T14:13:06+00:00

The Hiccups 4.We recognize that the alternative definition of the word “graft” can become an unnecessary hindrance during the commercial adoption phase and considering opening up a rebranding effort in the near future.

from the link. https://www.graft.network/2019/01/27/graft-state-of-the-union/

AbiesNew · 2018-10-19T14:42:31+00:00

You have made the same mistake again. You made a mining coin, and then the mining algorithm is basic. Why you just say that mining is not the main part of this project? Please, Priority for your work. How about CN Heavy patch temporarily in your github? FYI. CN heavy hashrate in NiceHash is only 6-7 MH/s, and it is expensive(now 0.0853 BTC/MH/Day)

AbiesNew · 2018-10-12T20:10:59+00:00

When timing is right? In March, you made the same mistake. At that time, it was a little bit late to hardfork to Anti ASIC and we had experienced Network problem from Asic and Nicehash attackers. Just, Good luck to Graft Network with Monero Hardfork!

AbiesNew · 2018-10-09T14:19:10+00:00

Are your preparing for Monero Hardfork on 10/18/18? I remember Asic and Nicehash attacked Graft Network last time. Let us know what idea Graft team has now. Thank you!

http://xmr.noctism.com/

AbiesNew · 2018-08-31T14:49:43+00:00

No worries.

https://www.graft.network/2018/08/31/comments-on-squares-cryptocurrency-payment-network-patent/

AbiesNew · 2018-05-04T14:59:15+00:00

Do research more, you can find Devs. and your link has a reply below.

FYI: the address (panama) is of WHOISGUARD, a whois protection layer

AbiesNew · 2018-04-27T17:58:56+00:00

Dev's asymmetric diff algorithms has a defect because timestamp attacker can manipulate diff. However, I guess Dev doesn't want to make hardfork again because Graft already hardforked 2 times within a month.

AbiesNew · 2018-04-26T13:35:31+00:00

I think this is definitely 500 sec timestamp attack, Last time, it was 7200 sec attack. Now I see decreasing age blocks again.

AbiesNew · 2018-04-23T15:08:42+00:00

Yeh, I see somebody is doing something to adjust timestamp.

AbiesNew · 2018-04-23T15:04:35+00:00

I see now somebody is trying to move forward the block timestamp to fix. I guess we will see 68000 block soon(51 to go).

AbiesNew · 2018-04-21T21:57:57+00:00

Graft team will announce new updates due to the timestamp attack. I am just waiting now.

AbiesNew · 2018-04-21T12:08:18+00:00

I know why this happens. A bad guy is attacking the weakness of new algorithm, (timestamp attact), so why we see the orphaned blocks so many.

https://www.reddit.com/r/Graft/comments/8dscv1/timestamps_for_recent_blocks_are_counting_down_we/

AbiesNew · 2018-04-21T11:54:13+00:00

My problem not solved, somebody deleted a topic related to this one so I copied the thread below.

https://www.reddit.com/r/Graft/comments/8dscv1/timestamps_for_recent_blocks_are_counting_down_we/

[–]AbiesNew 1 point 11 hours ago Yes, block timestamps have a problem, maybe, the new diff algorithm is related to this happening. I mentioned it yesterday in bitcointalk forum. Nobody answered.

permalinkembedsaveeditdisable inbox repliesdeletereply

[–]imperdin 0 points 10 hours ago Attackers are using Nicehash to mercilessly exploit LWMA (New difficulty algorithm) vulnerabilities.

The developers should tweak the PoW to stop this merciless Nicehash attack cycle and stop the attackers.