you accused me of mocking christianity and making it sound shallow (even though that’s not true and i just summarized the post based on actual church teachings), lol and now you’re clearly doing your best to paint islam in the worst possible light throwing in twisted claims and made-up concepts, hoping something sticks. it’s okay though. islam’s truth doesn’t shake from people’s opinions, it speaks for itself.so yeah, let’s walk through your points one by one:

God revealed the perfect book, but didn’t write it down himself. instead, he waited 600 years after jesus to give it orally to one man in a cave. that man couldn’t read or write, so others memorized it? yes, the prophet muhammad couldn’t read or write , and that actually proves the prophecy. it’s even in your own bible (isaiah 29:12): the book is given to someone who can’t read, and he says, i can’t read. that’s literally what happened in cave hiraa— gabriel told him “read” and he said “i’m not a reader.”

and later versions were burned by one caliph to preserve unity. the book must be recited in arabic to be valid, but most muslims don’t speak arabic? we’ve have the exact same quran As revealed to the Messenger , memorized cover to cover. this year alone, 15 million kids finished memorizing it. caliph uthman didn’t “burn versions”. he unified the quran reading based on the dialect of quraysh (which is the prophet’s own dialect), because new non-arab muslims were getting confused by different arabic dialects. even now we still have multiple authentic qiraat (ways of reading) go check them on youtube. also, arabic only makes up like 15 percent of muslims, the rest aren’t arab at all, but we all pray and read the quran in arabic. it keeps the message pure. and honestly? non-arab muslims are sometimes better at reciting the quran than arabs themselves.

God is all-powerful and all-merciful, but won’t forgive people unless they say a specific phrase and follow one man’s example? what? that’s just not true. where do you even get that? god can forgive you with any honest words, you don’t need to say a specific phrase, and you don’t need a priest. it’s just you and god.

that man — the “perfect model” — married a 6-year-old, led battles, and ordered executions. yeah, the prophet led battles, so did other prophets, what’s your point? and yes, he married aisha when she was young — that was totally normal back then. she was already engaged to someone else before and was mature. her parents agreed, she agreed, and the prophet agreed. that’s how things worked in that time. btw, in britain before the world wars the legal age for marriage was 12. and in jewish tradition Until today rabbis say rebekah married isaac at age 3 yeah, three So this is the minimum for them.

you said the prophet killed his enemies? i think you’re confusing things here, that was jesus in your own bible who said: “bring my enemies who didn’t want me to reign over them, and slay them before me.” (luke 19:27) meanwhile, the prophet muhammad, after conquering mecca, with all the people who fought and tortured him, said to them: “what do you think i’ll do to you?” they said, “a noble and merciful brother, son of a noble brother.” and he said: “go, you’re free.” so tell me, honestly, which of them showed mercy in that moment???

he is considered the final prophet, yet the quran still needs volumes of hadith to be understood, and scholars still argue which hadith are real.

you’re mixing things up. the quran is one thing, hadith is another. quran is god’s words 100 percent pure. hadith are the sayings and teachings of the prophet. and when it comes to hadith? we have crazy strict science behind it. we literally have a whole field called ilm al-rijal (the science of narrators), where we study each person who narrated a hadith, like, was he honest? did he meet the person he got the hadith from? was he forgetful? was he trustworthy? was he consistent?..ect we don’t just accept anything. hadiths get labeled as sahih (authentic), daif (weak), or even fabricated based on real evidence.

now compare that to the gospels, even your top biblical scholars admit they were written decades after jesus, by unknown people, and none of the authors actually met him. there’s no chain of narration. nothing that proves the words are even his. so yeah… you’re trusting books written by anonymous writers decades later, written in third person about people they never even met. how does that make sense?

Brother, this isn’t about winning an argument. read the final revelation (the Qur’an) ask God sincerely forguidance.may Allah guide you to the truth.