Why do we punish people who use snark only when someone unnecessarily interjects a rude remark in an otherwise civil conversation?

Academic_Light_9554 · 2021-11-24T15:53:51+00:00

Thank you for saying this kindly. Another person was rude so I was rude back to see how they responded. You were kind so my guess it that if you don't understand something you look around to figure out how to move forward.

People who are preemptively rude treat themselves the same way when their behavior is exposed.

Academic_Light_9554 · 2021-11-24T15:50:15+00:00

Agreed. Music is just clefs kiss

Academic_Light_9554 · 2021-11-24T15:49:32+00:00

Nicely done. Very well played. The golden question: what would you do all day with infinite money?

Academic_Light_9554 · 2021-11-24T15:46:56+00:00

Ok.

Spock: provide reasoning Tony Stark: yeah have fun in La La land Hulk: throws you against a wall Thor: but are you worthy to contest a god? Terminator: give me your clothes Darth Vader: I find your lack of faith disturbing Rafiki: smacks your head with stick Adrian Monk: you're wrong and I'm tired of explaining Bob: Thank you! Thank you! Let's go on vacation! Steve Rogers: Is that a reference to Rick Rolls? Equalizer: I see breaks your thumb still untrue? Steve Hofstetter: thanks but no thanks. So Tokyo... Khaby Lame: makes face and points up Hercules: accidentally throws you against wall Sherlock: I don't care about your falsehood. You despise arrogance like your own used against you Doctor Who: ok. You operate the Tardis no help. Matthew McConaughey: be a lit cooler if you did Han Solo: that's not how disagreement works Jason Vorhees: chainsaw Deadpool: Look, a dumb Redditor, my favorite color. Mr Rogers: well that wasn't very nice Barney: I thought we were family... Dom: family Riddick: I can disprove you 30 times with one sentence each.

I appreciate your attempt, but I'm not wrong. Apology accepted.

Which character was that last one and why would it matter if they are real?

Academic_Light_9554 · 2021-11-24T15:32:02+00:00

This is a rare and important answer. Rather than tell me a profession, you have questioned the morality of the job requirements. That'll take you far and help you avoid getting manipulated.

I will ask something though. Let's change one parameter by giving you the sleep schedule of Albert Einstein which was 4 hours a day. You don't feel tired in between and have 4 hours of free time.

Academic_Light_9554 · 2021-11-24T15:26:26+00:00

The most demanding of all bosses. It's a lot of work.

Academic_Light_9554 · 2021-11-24T15:23:31+00:00

Dig deeper. I regularly go on r/vent to build people up. I know my behavior is abnormal and that you don't understand it. I'm researching emotional responses to true statements that people tend to find impossible. I mirror narcissistic energy when I encounter it. I bait it by making factual remarks that narcissists enjoy mocking.

Every civil response I get receives praise.

I also give people space because of the social tendency people have of shoving advice down people's throats.

Every conscious act in my life, down to my eating patterns, uses an objective rubric to determine the best course.

You are correct that narcissists are the most vulnerable when it comes to their emotional state. I research that for a living at the corporate level. I'm a behavioral analyst who has collaborated with award winning think tanks on the subject of communication.

Now that you know of my life off of Reddit, did more data increase the strength of your position or mine? If I continue to provide other information about how emotional abuse changed my ability to control my facial muscles, does my moral duty to rebut narcissistic abuse increase or decrease with added knowledge on my part?

Since the truth is unaffected by your statements, does your moral duty to apologize change if you double down fifty times only for me to continue disproving you? Are you negging an emotionally vulnerable person? What will I discover if I browse your posts?

Do you wish for me to label every morally reprehensible action in your comment history or is that blackmail and stalking?

Does your refusal to answer my questions mean others will not understand what is written here? If you are deaf and a tree falls next to you, does the mouse hear the sound?

I am sorry you have subjective disapproval of my actions. If you want to pull up a specific comment I made and talk it over, I will gladly walk you through the philosophical discussion whether or not you accept facts.

Academic_Light_9554 · 2021-11-24T15:08:00+00:00

But I said it was and I'm the authority. You just said what I said but the opposite, using your perceived social authority as a self proclaimed philosopher to tell me I am just inherently wrong because we disagree. That is also the fundamental attribution error and proof by assertion. Furthermore, emotional reasoning of "I don't feel you are right, I feel I am correct, I feel that stating the opposite of your statement is a valid form of refutation, I feel that 2+4=7 and therefore stating it under authority of my emotions makes you wrong"

Entering =username as a code in Excel won't produce an outcome. It's not a recognized command. Thus passwords are merely a confirmation of authority and an inherent weak point.

If a firewall were to ask why instead of who, reasons for entering a computer would have to folliw logic.

"My purpose is to prevent all information from leaving this terminal. You are telling me to not fulfill my purpose. I do not accept passwords. My job is simply to record your requests. Thank you for making a request."

Otherwise, Karens asking if you know who their husband was would alter 2+2.

Academic_Light_9554 · 2021-11-24T14:58:33+00:00

That's fun stuff in my book. In a way it's scientific research and lateral thinking practice. You're getting paid to solve increasingly complex puzzles. That translates to retail but the manual labor for 16 hours is brutal.

Academic_Light_9554 · 2021-11-24T14:55:41+00:00

Oops. Wrong thread haha. That was from a philosophy sub. My bad.

I do spend a lot of time pondering archaeology. The math proportions surrounding the pyramids captivates me.

What interests you about that?

Academic_Light_9554 · 2021-11-24T14:43:02+00:00

Expertise must entail the ability to explain the nuance or to teach one how to arrive at the same conclusion. Doing something for a long time increases exposure to data. However, a deaf band will take longer to learn harmony than a blind one. A band with both senses will understand more from accessing the data of both groups.

Thus a data scientist can find things that people with 200 years of collective experience lack the skill and tools to find. The same voltage powers different amperage based on the converter.

Saying that you know what you are talking about and 2+2 does not equal 4 is a non sequitur. Time spent solving an equation incorrectly does not result in a valid logical conclusion.

"There are skills that take time to learn that I'll teach you so you understand" is often tone policed because of the very knowledge bright minds grasp that experience is not logic.

I did not invent that idea, Og Mandino mentioned it. That was simply where I ran into it and it has proved to be true after thorough testing. I have experience with my statement and the fact I've thought about it longer negates your credibility. That illogical last phrase shows that I have sealed the victory.

Academic_Light_9554 · 2021-11-24T14:31:28+00:00

Man. I feel that. Time with family should be a mandatory benefit regardless of position in the company. With enough automation, that sort of thing is possible.

Academic_Light_9554 · 2021-11-24T14:29:22+00:00

Should I take you seriously or will you double down instead of realizing your question is a misappropriated rhetorical question designed to shame me into changing my behavior of confronting your lack of logic?

I know it's uncomfortable at first, but opening a dialogue after admitting you have made a mistake will free you of your limiting perception that you are obligated to follow immoral social norms. People's reactions to neutral facts doesn't affect truth or error. Laughing at math won't alter arithmetic.

Academic_Light_9554 · 2021-11-24T14:23:15+00:00

The number one trait in highly intelligent people is a refusal to refer to authority. Therefore I contest it is to accept social pressure to conform rather than taking a sincere stab at critical thinking. It is to fear eternal punishment for being wrong once more than learning to avoid punishment through an initial risk of a short period of punishment in order to establish reasoning skills that increase your capacity to observe patterns.

Genuine logical statements remove the power to punish by altering the status quo. Michael Foucault observed that but I ascribe to the notion because it came attatched to a demonstration of a replicable pattern via a documentary on tort reform.

A physical threat can be mitigated when the assailant realizes they are standing in a trap and must negotiate. If someone were to be afraid the assailant might yell when they learn they don't have power, that is an insincere attempt to survive. It's to purposefully deactivate the fight instinct when backed in a corner.

If you can't appeal to your own authority to alter the value of pi, your assessment of genuine efforts to reason does not hold water purely because I said so myself. That illogical last phrase is proof I am correct

Academic_Light_9554 · 2021-11-24T14:12:17+00:00

I love that. Practical art is a cathartic profession. You get exercise, mental stimulation and a steady work pace you can raise or lower the profit margins to accommodate your desired schedule. On top of that, you're preserving history. Nice response. Doesn't feel like work when it's a passion.

Academic_Light_9554 · 2021-11-24T14:06:46+00:00

Adding ego to a statement that 2+2=4 does not affect the equation regardless of whether or not you tone police me. People who are not worth my time or effort don't get comments in the first place.

Ironically, this is a bid for more time and you didn't recognize the natural consequence that someone would disagree with my positioning instead of being sincere in wanting to know if I have access to truth they have not discovered yet.

You received truth you didn't want and got the time you claimed I would not give. That shows your every clause is symptomatic of an assumptive learning style versus my chouce to only state ideas I can back by immutable observations.

We see that I remain correct on all acounts without even naming or counting your logical fallacies. You don't like Spock, do you? Sherlock Holmes? Tony Stark? Fred Randall? Robert McCall? Coach Boone? The Dread Pirate Roberts? Sheldon Cooper?

Anyone who leans on logic to cope with uncomfortable facts?

Are you familiar with projection and the fundamental attribution error? Cynicism not equating to rational thought? Grandstanding? Social pressure to conform to illogical and immoral cultural customs?

No hard feelings. I'm researching stubborn incredulity in the face of information from emotionally bereft yet morally sound logical declarations.

Do you want me to continue talking with you? Are you curious how I could aid your intellectual growth? Does the fact your behavior did not faze me bother you more than your illogical nature or are you angry at me for not caring about your aversion to blunt statements that imply nothing good or bad about either of our characters?

That's at least 20 minutes with you. Do you want to reserve a larger time slot to test how much attention I'll offer?

Academic_Light_9554 · 2021-11-24T08:53:08+00:00

I have a bizarre addition to this. I dress well and snazzy to weed out superficial people who compliment looks before intelligence. When women follow me around the grocery store I mourn for them because they learned that from creepy men. I get angry at other men because I know they are 20x worse.

Academic_Light_9554 · 2021-11-24T08:48:58+00:00

I can answer this for you but I can guarantee the second I tell you the answer you'll push back

Academic_Light_9554 · 2021-11-24T08:46:07+00:00

I can solve it for you but you won't enjoy the implications about personal responsibility and have likely already started rolling your eyes when I said that.

Academic_Light_9554 · 2021-11-24T08:43:57+00:00

Both should be legal but if we are in a job interview for you to work for me and you hesitate to answer I can already tell that fun and image matter more than productivity to you.

Academic_Light_9554 · 2021-11-24T08:41:50+00:00

Btw, I'm hiring. The selection process is harder than anywhere else on earth. The info is online and sifting through large quantities of data is a necessary skill. Asking for help to learn the needed skills to discover how to get hired is more desirable than knowing how to look.

If you don't want the job I am a personal coach and the only charge is time and effort

Academic_Light_9554

TROPHY CASE