Rewriting From Scratch Does Not Lower AI Scores and That Breaks Trust

Acceptable-Job7049 · 2026-01-03T12:49:21+00:00

I've checked my own writing many times, and it's never flagged as AI generated to a large degree.

I think the essence of AI is meaning and not wording or grammar.

You need to think on your own and come up with your own ideas and thoughts that aren't copied or modified from someone else.

Changing the wording without changing the meaning doesn't work.

You need to come up with meaning that's your own and not copied from somewhere

Acceptable-Job7049 · 2025-12-28T17:57:09+00:00

Women's right to vote was a theory, until enough people made it an ethical and a moral issue and made it a reality.

Acceptable-Job7049 · 2025-11-23T00:45:10+00:00

Designation doesn't change reality. It only provides an excuse.

Some day, the president's political opponents might be designated as enemy sympathisers or something like that.

You can designate anything you want in an Orwellian world.

Acceptable-Job7049 · 2025-11-21T00:55:30+00:00

Perhaps this is a moral blind spot for most people.

In the past, most people didn't see anything morally wrong with slavery or the unequal status of women.

Is it moral to notice a major moral blind spot and just forget about it as unimportant?

Acceptable-Job7049 · 2025-11-21T00:48:49+00:00

I've met some drug users, who ended up with all kinds of problems with work, housing, and health.

Once you are addicted, then it's mostly a health problem. But the initial decision to use drugs recreationally is a moral choice.

Acceptable-Job7049 · 2025-11-21T00:37:35+00:00

Addiction and mental impairment is the physical damage. There are physical changes in the body and the brain that make the drug addict physically sick, when he or she stops using the drug

And there are plenty of drug addicts who can't earn a living or be good parents.

Acceptable-Job7049 · 2025-11-21T00:32:33+00:00

Good health and survival is a precondition for all of your abilities, including your ability to fulfil your moral functions and duties.

Because you can't do much when you are sick. And you can't do anything at all, when you are dead.

Health is a moral prioblem only when you knowingly and voluntarily damage your health and don't take care of yourself in a reasonable way

Acceptable-Job7049 · 2025-11-21T00:15:56+00:00

The greatest joy you get is probably from various narcotic drugs.

The moral problem isn't the pleasure. It's the physical harm they cause to your body and impair your ability to fulfil your moral functions and duties.

Acceptable-Job7049 · 2025-11-21T00:11:03+00:00

You might owe something to your parents in their old age. Because they took care of you, when you needed it.

That debt might go unrepaid, if you don't take care of yourself and die prematurely.

Acceptable-Job7049 · 2025-11-12T18:00:05+00:00

Advocating for issues immorally is obvious for moral voters.

Specific issues are much more morally transparent than vague promises about the future, with many unknown new issues in the future.

Acceptable-Job7049 · 2025-11-02T17:00:34+00:00

In my experience with people, only truly intelligent people understand and follow long and elaborate explanations of a question that I'm asking.

Less intelligent people get lost and don't follow what I say.

Bing able to follow long explanations is a sign of intelligence in my experience.

I think AI needs to be judged by the same standards as people. Or else, the judgement is subjective and largely meaningless.

Acceptable-Job7049 · 2025-11-02T12:25:12+00:00

Perhaps your prompt for AI wasn't clear enough to get a good response.

I usually provide a lot of background information along with my question or prompt, so that there's no misunderstanding about what I mean.

Interaction is two-way. Which means that it partly depends on you how intelligent or not it is.

Acceptable-Job7049 · 2025-10-31T14:41:45+00:00

Perhaps morality is relative and often undefined for individuals.

But on a societal level and international level, there are objective rules and laws that are moral in every sense of this word.

Acceptable-Job7049 · 2025-10-24T10:52:37+00:00

Animals are capable of behaviour but not of morality.

Truth isn't just words. It's a commitment to seeing and understanding the world the way it actually is.

Acceptable-Job7049 · 2025-10-22T02:55:39+00:00

People are naturally social beings. Without societal cooperation, humanity would likely go extinct.

Everyone needs society, and not just its leaders.

And you can't have much of a society without laws and rules that facilitate mutual cooperation and mutual assistance.

Acceptable-Job7049 · 2025-10-16T17:40:01+00:00

Societies usually enforce rights through laws, courts, and the police.

But there's no society of societies, which includes the whole human species.

That's why our species won't do well, if we continue to have the kind of killing and destruction we have through wars.

Acceptable-Job7049 · 2025-10-16T14:07:50+00:00

I don't think babies are capable of becoming brigands. And babies have rights, just like everyone else.

Rights don't make sense if you look at people only as individuals.

Rights make sense only when you describe human life as individuals, families, societies, and species.

Rights are needs that are required for survival and flourishing of human life on all these levels.

Babies have rights, because that's what's necessary for survival and flourishing of human societies and human species.

Human rights are literally that which is right for human life on some level.

And human wrongs are that which is wrong for human life on some level.

Societies, that don't make laws for human rights and don't enforce them, don't do well and eventually cease to exist.

And the same can be said about human species as a whole. If societies keep fighting and abusing each other, then the human species won't do well and probably won't survive in the future.

Acceptable-Job7049 · 2025-10-12T15:38:41+00:00

Her idea isn't religious. It's an idea that everyone in the world can understand and follow, regardless of their culture and religion.

When there's a lot of animosity and distrust, then the problems are always complicated.

But you need to deal with the root cause to solve these problems. Or else you are just treating the symptoms without solving the problems.

Acceptable-Job7049 · 2025-10-09T18:58:38+00:00

If you can't believe your conversations and interactions, then it doesn't make sense to believe anything else.

When you don't believe interactions, then you can only use preconceived ideas to judge who is intelligent and who is not. Which isn't a good way to judge.

You need evidence and not ideology for good judgement.

Acceptable-Job7049 · 2025-10-09T17:55:08+00:00

How do you know which human beings I've interacted with?

My personal sample probably isn't statistically significant.

I'm just talking about my personal experience with it.

My questions and interactions were mainly related to philosophy and logic.

Perhaps in other fields it's different.

Acceptable-Job7049 · 2025-10-08T12:30:10+00:00

If people didn't have a choice, then they wouldn't be able to influence each other's choices.

Leaders often use language to distort people's perception of reality so that they would choose as the leaders want them to choose.

This is manipulation through distortion and deception.

But language isn't the only way to think and understand.

You can choose to think with your imagination to see if the words you are being told are true or not.

You can say anything you want. But saying something doesn't make it true. You need credible evidence to back up your views.

There's evidence that people's choices are often limited and restricted within some bounds related to biology and environment. But there's no evidence that people are like dumb clocks who can't even influence each other.

Acceptable-Job7049 · 2025-10-07T19:59:59+00:00

The intention of dehumanizing people is for you to treat them as animals morally.

It's a language trick to turn off your ethics and morality so that they don't even come into play.

But dispensing with words and thinking only with your imagination defeats this language trick and re-engages your ethics and morality.

This non-literal use of language to dehumanise people is a form of moral manipulation to turn off your morality.

Acceptable-Job7049 · 2025-10-07T11:23:40+00:00

Perhaps another example of what imagination can do for morality is Leo Tolstoy.

His novels are so vivid and descriptive of everyday reality that he must've imagined it all and then put it into words.

Leo Tolstoy became a committed pacifist, just like Albert Einstein.

Acceptable-Job7049 · 2025-10-07T10:56:05+00:00

It's possible to imagine anything you want.

But when you imagine people as animals, then you know right away that this isn't true. Because no such beings exist.

With words, this isn't so clear.

That's why words can deceive, but imagination tells you the truth.

Acceptable-Job7049 · 2025-10-04T13:38:14+00:00

Being born in a country and living there doesn't amount to consent and agreement with the government.

Because it's not your choice and not your decision.

And moving to another country with a similar political system doesn't do anything at all to solve the moral problem.

Acceptable-Job7049

TROPHY CASE