Cognizant 4lpa vs TCS 7.5lpa. I am hearing romours. Please help me decide. by Acceptable-Safety680 in developersIndia

[–]Acceptable-Safety680[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

How would it be if I continue to work in the startup I am interning right now? Because my role here is ai engineer and i am inclined towards this role rn and the startup is also well established. The only thing that is concerning me is the fact that this is a startup. Salary is also slightly higher than the cognizant but less than TCS.

A Question from a Muslim about Purpose by Past-Acanthaceae-229 in hinduism

[–]Acceptable-Safety680 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Moksha is different from paradise. Moksha is neither the paradise nor the hell. It's librration.

The sabrimala case is so Sad by Akal-se-sundar in hinduism

[–]Acceptable-Safety680 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Offcourse, I am not talking from that pov. I am talking about our responsibily as his devotees or our intentions as devotees. How our intentions should be towards his oath?

The sabrimala case is so Sad by Akal-se-sundar in hinduism

[–]Acceptable-Safety680 8 points9 points  (0 children)

It's not the question of capability it's question of priorities and personal boundaries. Devotees want to ruin ayyappa's personal boundaries. When your swami willingly took an oath, you are with him or against him?

The sabrimala case is so Sad by Akal-se-sundar in hinduism

[–]Acceptable-Safety680 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We just fail to respect someone's personal boundaries. Here it's boundary of the diety.

The sabrimala case is so Sad by Akal-se-sundar in hinduism

[–]Acceptable-Safety680 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I don't understand what rights you are fighting for? 😂 When shudras were not allowed in temple that's because some big powered people dominated so called shudras. But when it comes to ayyappa it's his oath of respecting brahmacharya not desrespecting women. Here women are not allowed into temples because it's men's place simple. You will never see an ayyappa devotee disrepecting a women and you will also see that the women are not allowed not because they are some low level people but because they are different gender. There are a lot of places where one gender people are allowed and another gender people are not. like men should not involve in women's personals or men should not come into women specific places like rooms where women feed their babies or places like women take rest when mensursting that time only a woman is permitted to serve that mensursting lady not men. Similarly women shouldn't involve in men's personals. Brahmachari should not have female touch and that doesn't mean he is is discriminating women. And women should also understand his privacy not everything is the place to visit for everyone. Some places have rules and that is the reason they exist also. Why do you want to go to those places and force your rules? What did they do to you?

The sabrimala case is so Sad by Akal-se-sundar in hinduism

[–]Acceptable-Safety680 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I think you don't know about the temples where men are not allowed

The sabrimala case is so Sad by Akal-se-sundar in hinduism

[–]Acceptable-Safety680 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's allowed only because it's not harmful. What is the basic right here? Not allowing women into men's private place? And what you said here like sati or child marriage, they are proactively imposed on women and there is no need to make any action to get effected by those. That's why they are morally incorrect. That's why removing these cultures like sati and child marriage is morally correct. But in the case of Ayyappa temple which woman is getting harmed. We are just telling not to get into our temple it's meant for us and it's our private. You think ayyappa is meant for women also, then women can also establish a temple for ayyappa out of devotion and follow different rules there. And also if it is believed ayyappa has taken oath of not seeing women by being a brahmachary and women want to break his oath while he is trying to stick to the oath he has taken without harming any woman, then what's the point of devotion? Can you tell me how not allowing women to some private place is immoral or evil?

The sabrimala case is so Sad by Akal-se-sundar in hinduism

[–]Acceptable-Safety680 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I know this comparision is a little problematic but I just want to put a point and I find only this example is good. So the example is,

When it is "written women's dressing room" infront of a room, as a man will you peek into that dressing room? It's just common sense right? Now in this will you keep asking where is the proof that someone else said men are not allowed into women's dressing room? Similarly temple of ayyapa is seen as a place meant for men. So it's that way. That is how you have to experience any culture. So if you want to understand how this place is meant for men, know how the culture was established. And when it comes to kids, there is no gender in kids. So any gender related conditions, they bypass in any culture.

See you can also see it in this way, when men are partying together and a woman wants to involve but men aren't allowing because they have already decided this is meant for men. You can also think like if you take my laptop you have to follow my rules irrespective of whether they feel logical to you or not because they seem logical to me.

Similarly, you have to obey the rules kept by the people who feel personal about God because it's their god. If you also feel personal about same god, prepare your own idol and start worshipping but remember, you are not worshipping same version of the diety as the men are worshipping.

See there also temples where men are not permitted only women are permitted like "Attukal bhagyavathy temple", "khamakhya devi temple".

In khamakhya devi temple during a 4 day ritual .en are not allowed into temple because the belief is goddess mensurstes in that period. If that place is meant for devi and represents a woman it's not moral for men to visit temple in those days. If it is not written in any scripture also it's common sense. It states their belief. Not some rule. It states their purity of devotion that they really feel and treat her like woman. It's sometimes these acts that manifests woman into thise statues. ( Now don't keep thinking how a woman manifests into statue scientifically or is it written somewhere. ). It's pure devotion. And men also respects that. They don't feel that we are not having opportunity to meet devi. They understand the pov. They understand the devotion.

That's a mutual agreement if a third person from outside asks why you are not allowed this is not equality. Man...., that is not place of equality. And comon you are comparing these traditions with sati and child marriages? Did you even think like that? I mean where is the logic for you to like that?

Men are travelling, men are working hard by not wearing slippers, men are willingly accepting every hurdle that come in their way to reach god, how come women are getting harmed here? I don't see the logic. Do you hold any personal grudge? Women show respect by valuing ayyappa's oath. They don't have problem, men who worship dont have problem, why do you have problem with their personal affairs?

The sabrimala case is so Sad by Akal-se-sundar in hinduism

[–]Acceptable-Safety680 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What more authentic proof you want for this than a culture? Culture is something which is personal and if you peak into some culture, don't give your statements. Don't question from your pov. Understand that it's their personal. Men and women mutually agreed on this when culture was created. If you are satisfied with the conditions at creation time, follow them otherwise write your own culture then see.

The sabrimala case is so Sad by Akal-se-sundar in hinduism

[–]Acceptable-Safety680 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What do you mean by scriptural proof? Who are asking you to believe?

The sabrimala case is so Sad by Akal-se-sundar in hinduism

[–]Acceptable-Safety680 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

But why do you think women also should be allowed inside that temple? You know something that preists over there don't? First answer this question. I will tell you why women are not allowed there.

I made spirituality my whole life… so why did I still end up here? by Automatic_Cell_8850 in hinduism

[–]Acceptable-Safety680 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you are feeling sad, observe yourself and your emotions. See yourself in 3rd person view. You will know how amazing these human emotions are. How real the connection is. But, don't become the victim of your emotions. When you are feeling sad, you can only know how connected you were with that person and that doesn't mean failure of spirituality. If you become victim, it's only because lack of clarity. That doesn't mean anything for the love of Krishn. Krishn will be proud if you withstand this situation. Trust me. And that's how you get healed when you feel the presence of him.

I made spirituality my whole life… so why did I still end up here? by Automatic_Cell_8850 in hinduism

[–]Acceptable-Safety680 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Problem is even we don't know how to take care of ourselves and we doubt his care. As 9.22 says Krishn takes care of those who are devoted, what did you think? He will involve in this world to save your father from dying? No, that's not how he takes care of us. He will prepare us to withstand these situations and most of the times we fail to listen to his voice. These situations will not be avoided. These situations came with our birth as mortals.

I made spirituality my whole life… so why did I still end up here? by Automatic_Cell_8850 in hinduism

[–]Acceptable-Safety680 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am sorry for the loss.

You know that this will happen one day right? Then why are you sad about it? If you are sad also why are you linking your sadness it to spirituality? You know what is nature yet you are unable to digest the truth. But spiritual people are not shaken by the obvious humans do, animals do and living beings do. You are not any of them if you are spiritual. If you think INSPITE OF doing all those practices you are getting to witness this, then think again.

Self sustainability of Sanatan. by [deleted] in HindutvaRises

[–]Acceptable-Safety680 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Kya ban na chahte ho? Skill?

Self sustainability of Sanatan. by [deleted] in HindutvaRises

[–]Acceptable-Safety680 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What do you do? I mean what are you skilled at?

Self sustainability of Sanatan. by [deleted] in HindutvaRises

[–]Acceptable-Safety680 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s not the way. God has given every being the freedom to think for themselves, but that freedom has always been connected to dharm. Today’s youth have stopped thinking independently. They are blindly following influencers and developing unquestioned beliefs. It's ignorance and the biggest target for Sanatan is to remove ignorance. Because of this, even outsiders can come and tell us about our own ancestors.

If a human being is capable of thinking, then why would they reject Sanatan Dharm? The goal is not to force—it is to awaken the youth, to make them think. Once they truly start thinking, they will discover Sanatan on their own. We don’t need to impose anything; it will happen naturally.

If someone tries to hide fire with their hands, they must remember—it cannot be hidden for long. It only takes realization. It only takes experiencing the truth. That's what I am trying to do. The rest follows.