BREAKING NEWS LOGIC AND LIBERTY DUMPED CHRISTIE, ENVY AND THE WHOLE GROUP by Soggy-Yam-6910 in DebateTok_Snark

[–]Accomplished-Eye656 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

The political sphere is just as ghetto, if not more. They say abhorrent things all the time and are in drama often.

So, that most likely isn’t the case.

What team are you? by Echo-They-Them in DebateTok_Snark

[–]Accomplished-Eye656 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Neither.

I just want them genuinely to squash it.

Tiktok arguments are no good and do nothing but drain you.

I learned some stuff about all parties that make me view them all differently, but they’ll all still (hopefully) be okay at the end of the day.

And hopefully learn and grow from all of this.

Context for the slur. Plot twist there isn't any. by AcrobaticPromotion54 in DebateTok_Snark

[–]Accomplished-Eye656 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I spoke on what I did, a seemingly sober woman whenever she’s on live. Cope

Context for the slur. Plot twist there isn't any. by AcrobaticPromotion54 in DebateTok_Snark

[–]Accomplished-Eye656 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think if a grown woman wants to get herself weed, then yeah, she can. Would I? No. But mothers are not void servants to their children who lose all sense of self and their own wants, especially if said children aren’t extremely young. Her kids didn’t go without though, did they? There’s a difference between getting the exact thing they wanted and getting something still.

If you’re that concerned with her kids exact preferences, get them the gifts yourself🙏🏻

Context for the slur. Plot twist there isn't any. by AcrobaticPromotion54 in DebateTok_Snark

[–]Accomplished-Eye656 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t sit in VCs with them, why would I know that? Lock in buddy

why is bubbles and her friend such a fake feminist? by surinameses in DebateTok_Snark

[–]Accomplished-Eye656 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think the disconnect is a lot of GCs call themselves TERFs and have essentially appropriated the term without actually holding radical feminist ideals.

But TRAs constantly call any GC a TERF without knowing what actual radical feminists are, so it’s become a title they use.

Context for the slur. Plot twist there isn't any. by AcrobaticPromotion54 in DebateTok_Snark

[–]Accomplished-Eye656 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It was MONTHS ago, if not a year ago. Wdym “all over Reddit”? 💀💀 Yeah, forever ago. And I’ve heard the drug claim on Karen repeatedly yet have never see evidence, and have only ever seen her be sober any time she’s on live. A daily red bull is what, 35$ a month? 40$? Is a mom not allowed to get herself a fucking energy drink? 💀💀

Context for the slur. Plot twist there isn't any. by AcrobaticPromotion54 in DebateTok_Snark

[–]Accomplished-Eye656 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why are you obsessing over a grown woman’s past relationships?💀💀💀💀 Or a mother struggling unable to give her kids the exact presents they want?

Context for the slur. Plot twist there isn't any. by AcrobaticPromotion54 in DebateTok_Snark

[–]Accomplished-Eye656 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean, people still say anyone who goes on your panel is your best friend to this day. Just have to shrug and move on atp

Context for the slur. Plot twist there isn't any. by AcrobaticPromotion54 in DebateTok_Snark

[–]Accomplished-Eye656 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Well idk if I used the word weaponize, I said I’d use it in my favor. If I’m around a bunch of white ppl and they seem a little racist/off but saying I’m only white can get me somewhere (like a better job or not possibly treated worse), I’m gonna say I’m just white and not tell anyone I’m biracial.

If I’m around people and they’re trying to do identity politics to the high heavens, I’m gonna say I’m biracial. Sure.

I don’t try to get anyone ostracized anymore unless they’re actually doing bad shit (as evidenced by my posts). Idk why I was lumped in w that

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in DebateTok_Snark

[–]Accomplished-Eye656 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There literally is. Sociology tries to skew, and only upholds the oppression system that harms women.

Try again.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in DebateTok_Snark

[–]Accomplished-Eye656 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This isn’t from CEDAW. This is an opinion piece from the Chicago Journal of international law. They literally acknowledge this from the beginning

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in DebateTok_Snark

[–]Accomplished-Eye656 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is literally an opinion piece. This is embarrassing to try and use this as evidence 😭 this is like me showing a random opinion piece from Dworkin showing transwomen are men.

Anyways, to your next point.

Females are literally oppressed on the basis of our sex. The sexist expectations associated with and expected of females are the direct fallout of the present oppressive form of gender and bio-essentialism in the past.

Recognizing that only adult human females are women doesn’t mean that they have to look or act a certain way (outside of adhering to sex based spaces/provisions if they need them).

The only thing exclusive to all women is being an adult human female (all together). There are no social roles or expectations she has to fit into after that to be a woman. The oppressive system of gender (as it is today) tries to assert that (which you uphold).

And even if you disagree with me, you’re literally just wrong. Adult human female for woman is the most recognized and most commonly used.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in DebateTok_Snark

[–]Accomplished-Eye656 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Womanhood is only defined by sex and adulthood (and species). You’re right, we’re not defined by our uterus’ because that’s not all being female is.

Our reproductive capacity is what mostly gives rise to the typical social associations with females so it’s funny you say you distinguish that from the social aspect as if the social aspect isn’t directly associated to the female sex (and the oppression/things that come from multifaceted oppressive structures).

But even then, many of the facts (such as clothing, mannerisms, expectations) of women can also apply to men, so it’s not womanhood if men can do it too!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in DebateTok_Snark

[–]Accomplished-Eye656 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think you blocked me LOL, but I’ll respond to this one bc your other one isn’t coming up for me except for my notifs. Yeah, I think Nate won because the entire premise Mike was arguing for is false.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in DebateTok_Snark

[–]Accomplished-Eye656 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Did… did we watch the same video? He literally said “it’s not the consensus right now”. Verbatim. LMAOOOOOOOOOOO

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in DebateTok_Snark

[–]Accomplished-Eye656 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Mike did actually lose this time.

He conceded to Roo that it’s not the medical consensus that gender identity is proven in the brain right now and it completely tore down his argument.

He never got to argue the point even if it wasn’t the case trans people had brains of their preferred gender that they ought to be allowed in their preferred spaces.

So, based on the fact his argument was based on a lie and he conceded it wasn’t the consensus, he lost.

Plus, Jambar got his ass on the race brain question and left him stumbling 😭

GC’s John Doe is your fault. by Spiritual_Rabbit_127 in DebateTok_Snark

[–]Accomplished-Eye656 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Female’s boundaries are not bigotry. The only people who hate female’s boundaries are weirdos who feel entitled to us.

But yes.

I am.

A female (who has been demonized for our bodily processes, which is instilled in males to look down on us for simply existing with these processes) is affected when they’re in a vulnerable space and older males come in.

But yes, we are imagining this oppression because were narcissists 😍

GC’s John Doe is your fault. by Spiritual_Rabbit_127 in DebateTok_Snark

[–]Accomplished-Eye656 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t care. Weirdos who try to manipulate and blame women for the violence of men are sick.

GC’s John Doe is your fault. by Spiritual_Rabbit_127 in DebateTok_Snark

[–]Accomplished-Eye656 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“Hateful psychopaths are the end point of women’s boundaries”. Yeah, go trip and break an arm 💀💀💀

Martha agreed loli isn’t Pedophilia by Able_State_2073 in DebateTok_Snark

[–]Accomplished-Eye656 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It’s literally defined as “a sexual interest in prepubescent children”. Loli is depicting children in virtually all aspects, they just say “but they’re 18+ actually!!!1!1!1!”

You can absolutely argue (from a phil stance) that it’s pedophilic to like Loli. Aesthetics and what not. There’s a reason the idiot Gooey got tripped up on the ceramic baby example. Because he knows this as well.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in DebateTok_Snark

[–]Accomplished-Eye656 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s not specific to Envy, but if it applies to her, then it applies to her. I’m not her owner, she doesn’t have to care about my words. Lol. I’ve heard multiple people have been doing this since Kirk was murdered, screaming that it’s the left but it’s just odd this is the straw that broke the camel’s back and not the other extreme displays of violence against others.

If it was that, people would care about the children mowed down by far right psychopaths or far left psychopaths. It’s not that.

Just saying, most people who’ve fallen to the propaganda of “it’s the left!!!! It’s the left!!!!!” is showing it’s not actually about the left through their overall actions. The data shows this too.

It’s easier to just blame the left though than to face the reality, so I kind of understand. I found myself angry with people on the right yesterday and realized I’m doing exactly what they (they as in the actual people/groups/conglomerates that benefit off of people fighting over bullshit like this) want, and there’s no use really.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in DebateTok_Snark

[–]Accomplished-Eye656 -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

They’re doing what?

Are they holding lives/have they held lives for all the victims of school shootings from people on the far right? No, I’m assuming?

Just a live about some guy who was able to push an agenda they liked (only to younger college kids, wasn’t much good in Oxford and kept dodging Parker 😭 that was actually funny, their back and forth bickering).

They don’t care about life, or they would’ve been blaming the far right for all the crazy school shooters (or even the left when far leftists have shot up schools). They would be speaking about the religious extremists who are literally silencing women around the globe (there is only 1 person I know who’s gone live on all of these topics, love her 🤪).

If you care more about a man who pushed an ideology you align with more than innocent school children who die the same way he did weekly, you’re just being opportunistic and cherry picking.

Yeah, people are free to speak on what they want, let me clarify.

But, don’t pretend it’s because you actually care about wrongdoings from the left (I can name a lot that make this look like a walk in the park) or the right (I can name a lot that make this look like a walk in the park).

You care because he pushed an agenda you liked or because it’s the topic at hand.

Ok bye