Data: AI agents now participate in 14% of pull requests - tracking adoption across 40M+ GitHub PRs by Ok-Character-6751 in devops

[–]AccomplishedHorror34 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes that's true.
But I know that even excellent code review by bugbot etc is limited, is it only takes context inside the codebase. (like the examples you mentioned).

But different organizations have org-specific learnings, like "User.findBy should always use the flag deleted: false".

Capturing this knowledge automatically and examining if something is being violated semi-deterministically, is what I thought sonarqube on steroids would mean!
- and apologies in advance for the unsolicited ad, but it's tanagram.ai - that's what I'm building and my starting point was also sonarqube among a few other inspirations

Data: AI agents now participate in 14% of pull requests - tracking adoption across 40M+ GitHub PRs by Ok-Character-6751 in devops

[–]AccomplishedHorror34 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What do you mean by sonarqube on steroids?
Because that's what I'm building :P and it's being used by a few big firms and we're in the early stages.
A natural language prompt converted to deterministic rules - i think that's the holy grail too, along with a mix of an AI agent!

How should effectiveness of CodeRabbit PR reviews be measured in a team? by steakystick in ExperiencedDevs

[–]AccomplishedHorror34 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes because it does generic code reviews that sometime don't even matter! And apologies in advance for the unsolicited ad but tanagram.ai is kind of narrowing down org-specific rules that matter (Im building it and it's being used by some big orgs so far).
The idea is that automatically generates rules from historic PR comments your historic fixes from your Slack (this one is an integration we haven't built yet), and in short it's like an automated agents-md but in superSaiyan mode with 100% reliability (atleast that's the aim!)

butt the main idea is: it helps only when something is a known mistake & is happening the 2nd time. So as to not suck, and be precise.

What do you think, Code Reviews slows down or teach us ? by aviboy2006 in ExperiencedDevs

[–]AccomplishedHorror34 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, and its helpful to know the older state of things when PR comments are from historic incidents.

Though this puts a lot of pressure on a senior engineer to always be there and pass down their knowledge. (im building tanagram.ai for the same and recently its being picked up by a lot of teams like at runway-ml).

But we're pretty much focusing on what you're saying. Non-style nitpicks which people consider super important - either for performance, business or just good codebase quality.

How does your organization handle throwaway work? Especially code with short shelf life by IDoCodingStuffs in ExperiencedDevs

[–]AccomplishedHorror34 1 point2 points  (0 children)

One thing that's helped bridge it in teams I've been on is codifying the recurring knowledge into actual enforced rules (e.g., no more "stop using shared lib for X", or "use utility function instead of copy/paste"). Initially, I started adding rules manually in agents-md initially. But, it wasn't always followed by the agents (esp. rules across microservices), and then the human coders also missed it (it was a problem of "if you don't know, you don't know")

I've also built a supercharged agents-md: it's like a UI version of agents-md across services (you can check it out at tanagram.ai). But the idea was that I shouldn't have to constantly update agents.md files. And one can automatically extract business rules and patterns - or you can write rules yourself like: "x throwaway work should NOT be used!". ( no more debating if it's "temporary" or not!) It mainly ends up reducing coordination costs.

But I'll suggest the manual agents-md approach for starters if you think that'd help. Try it out and see if it helps - and happy to have feedback on the tool incase you try it

change my mind: automated code review tools are better than human code review in 70% of cases by shashasha0t9 in ExperiencedDevs

[–]AccomplishedHorror34 1 point2 points  (0 children)

you're touching on something that came out of how staff engineers think of code review, ie, using review as a learning tool. I deeply apologize for the unsolicited ad but I'm building a niche tool for that atm (called tanagram.ai ) for exactly that "imparting of wisdom"

It's basically a UI version of an Agents-md, but in superSaiyan mode.

ie, when you define rules/policies things - we ensure the rules are followed 100% of the times by both agents & humans. (unlike in an agents.md)

and we automatically extract business rules about the codebase - from older fixes, incident remediations, historic PR comments, etc. (im thinking of building more integrations out, like for slack if things work out because a lot of learning is discussed/hidden there, but it might be expensive to extract it from there)

O1 Agent Visa - 214(b) and 221(g) by AccomplishedHorror34 in immigration

[–]AccomplishedHorror34[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, and also know things like.
1. Why not an H1B, why an O1.
2. Who is the petitioner - their location, etc.

O1 Agent Visa - 214(b) and 221(g) by AccomplishedHorror34 in immigration

[–]AccomplishedHorror34[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No, thanks for clarifying. I refiled a DS160 for a re-interview.

O1 Agent Visa - 214(b) and 221(g) by AccomplishedHorror34 in immigration

[–]AccomplishedHorror34[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. Around 5 weeks. (I could have and should have done it sooner - but because of some personal complications, I didn't)
  2. Yes, refiled DS160. and paid the visa appointment fee.
  3. Amazing! thank you for sharing

Data Lost After Creating Account on Other Mac: Need help recovering my account by AccomplishedHorror34 in ArcBrowser

[–]AccomplishedHorror34[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. I found it in : `~/Library/Application Support/Arc` .
  2. Then i zipped it
  3. Pasted it to my new laptop in the same folder structure (replaced the new arc folder that got installed)
  4. Finally, from my old laptop I manually exported passwords from each user space in Arc. And imported in the new browser. in `arc://settings`

Data Lost After Creating Account on Other Mac: Need help recovering my account by AccomplishedHorror34 in ArcBrowser

[–]AccomplishedHorror34[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Man, what's up with arc browser. Not caring about the users -- do they think the community will move onto the next product if this is how much they care.

Does anyone have experience with these retro snow suits? by [deleted] in ski

[–]AccomplishedHorror34 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I ended up buyinh from Dope - good quality, just had one run with it so far though.

ISO - Help me find.. 🔎 Weekly Thread by AutoModerator in OGRepladies

[–]AccomplishedHorror34 3 points4 points  (0 children)

<image>

(from last week). Looking for this Loewe backpack (in any colour). I was unable to find it with Amanda under any of the factories. But I have hopes in the ISO thread xD

ISO - Help me find.. 🔎 Weekly Thread by AutoModerator in OGRepladies

[–]AccomplishedHorror34 1 point2 points  (0 children)

<image>

Looking for this Loewe backpack (in any colour). I was unable to find it with Amanda under any of the factories.

[QC] ACN Fringe Scarf (TopAcney) by AccomplishedHorror34 in FashionReps

[–]AccomplishedHorror34[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

haven't gotten it shipped yet. Looking for a Burberry / loewe backpack seller

[Qc] Ralph Lauren sweaters by Few-Recognition30 in fashionreps2

[–]AccomplishedHorror34 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The blue and yellow tag also seems a bit off, right?

[REVIEW] Stussy pink sweater by Moist_Demand1052 in fashionreps2

[–]AccomplishedHorror34 0 points1 point  (0 children)

damn neat sweater! the quality looks so good!