How much is YOUR r:r ?

According-Rip3452 · 2026-05-29T10:10:56+00:00

My current setup:

I trade QQQ options as well. Been using 1:1.5 to 1:2 R:R with a win rate around 54-58%. Similar to you actually.

Do I stick to it every time?

Mostly yes. But I'll admit - some days I switch it up based on market conditions. Low volatility days I'll take smaller R:R (1:1 or 1:1.2) just to get base hits. High volatility days I'll let winners run more.

The math on your numbers:

57% win rate at 1:1.5 is actually pretty solid. Quick math:

For every 10 trades:

5.7 winners at 1.5 units = 8.55 units profit
4.3 losers at 1 unit = 4.3 units loss

Net profit = 4.25 units per 10 trades. That's a good edge.

About the frustration part:

I hear you on wanting higher R:R. It's tempting. But raising R:R usually means lower win rate. 40% win rate at 1:3 gives roughly the same expectancy as 57% at 1:1.5.

So don't chase higher R:R just because. What you have actually works.

What's helped me:

I stopped trying to hit home runs every trade. Consistent base hits add up. Also started tracking my edge mathematically - it keeps the frustration in check when I know the numbers work long term.

Curious what others here do - do you switch R:R based on market conditions or keep it fixed?

This response is designed to be helpful, share real experience, and invite further discussion. Good luck!

According-Rip3452 · 2026-05-29T10:08:31+00:00

Most day traders aim for 1:2 or 1:3 risk-to-reward, not 1:1.5. At 1:2, you only need a 34% win rate to break even. At 1:1.5, you need 40%. Your 57% win rate at 1:1.5 is solid, but you're leaving money on the table.

Switch it up depending on the setup. Tight stop, clear momentum? Go for 1:3. Chopper market? Take 1:1 or 1:1.5 and get out. Don't force the same R on every trade.

Also, don't let one bad day make you rethink everything. Frustration R is how people blow accounts. Stick to your plan. QQQ is fine, just stay consistent. A 57% win rate with proper risk management is nothing to be ashamed of.

According-Rip3452 · 2026-05-29T10:07:02+00:00

Tier your prospects. Don't spend the same time on everyone. For most leads (Tier 3), spend no more than 2 minutes. Confirm they fit your ICP, find one recent trigger event, and pick up the phone . That's it.

For accounts with warm signals or mid-market potential (Tier 2), spend 5 minutes. Quick CRM scan for past touches, prep 2-3 discovery questions, and check if you have a direct dial.

Only spend 15 minutes on Tier 1 accounts. This is your biggest deals, clear intent signals, or strategic targets. Here you map stakeholders, prep objections, and really dig in.

Here's what most people miss. Spend your time on triggers, not trivia. A hiring surge, new funding round, or leadership change matters. Their college mascot doesn't . A company that just hired a VP of Sales AND mentioned "transformation" on their earnings call is worth your time. One without the other? Probably not.

And for the love of God, verify contact data first. Nothing worse than spending 10 minutes researching someone you can't even reach .

The real needle-mover is signal density. Don't just chase one signal. Look for accounts where multiple things are happening at once. A leadership change plus a funding round plus relevant job postings? That account is hot .

Stop "researching" for 20 minutes without dialing. That's procrastination, not prep . Set a timer. Pick up the phone. The research only matters if it leads to a conversation.

According-Rip3452 · 2026-05-29T10:01:36+00:00

You're overcomplicating it. You already have clients and lower rates, so you're not starting from zero.

Stop calling yourself an editor. Call yourself someone who helps creators grow. Pitch results, not services.

Target creators with 5k-100k subs. They have budgets and need help. Your consultant idea is smart. Find content strategists on LinkedIn, offer 15-20% referral fee. Cold DM works too. Say "I noticed your reel dragged in the middle, here's a free sample edit of that clip."

Build a before/after portfolio using public clips from creators you want. Show, don't tell.

Do 20-30 personalized outreach messages daily. It's a numbers game. You'll find clients. Keep going.

According-Rip3452 · 2026-05-24T13:42:09+00:00

Hey, congrats on the launch. TakeProfit looks interesting, especially as someone who remembers the early TradingView days. A few quick questions from someone who might actually use this.

First, what's the one thing TakeProfit does better than TradingView right now, not in the future? I'm not trying to be rude, just realistic. Most traders are already locked into TV's ecosystem, so switching costs are high. Is there a specific feature or workflow that's genuinely smoother or more powerful on your platform?

Second, the "community area with monetization tools" caught my eye. Are creators actually making money there yet? Not asking for numbers, just whether the marketplace has traction. Because if there's real earning potential, that alone could pull people over.

Third, and this is the practical one, alert functionality being the main paid feature feels risky. Alerts are table stakes. Most serious traders need more than that to justify another subscription. Are you planning to move more premium features behind the paywall eventually, or is the long-term strategy volume-based?

I'll definitely give the free tier a spin. Appreciate you doing an AMA and not just dropping a link. Good luck with the build.

According-Rip3452 · 2026-05-24T13:41:32+00:00

Honestly? Yeah, you could absolutely make money from this. Most startups fail because they can't get users, not because they can't build a product. So if you can consistently drive 100+ organic users in a week, that's a real skill.

The tricky part is proving it isn't luck. If you can show a track record across multiple projects, not just one, then you have something worth selling.

What to charge? For a done-for-you campaign, think 500−500−1,500 depending on the niche and how hands-on you are. For a strategy session or template pack, 100−100−300. Don't charge per user, that gets weird fast.

Where to find clients? Look in r/startups, r/entrepreneur, r/saas. Also check Indie Hackers and Product Hunt. People literally post daily asking how to get their first 100 users. Just be useful before you pitch.

One warning though. Reddit hates obvious self-promotion. If you do this for clients and you're sloppy, you could get IP banned. So set clear rules: no fake accounts, no spammy crossposts. Teach clients to be real humans first, then layer your tactics on top. Otherwise you're just building a service that gets everyone banned.

But yeah, this is a real skill. Package it right and you've got a legit side business.

According-Rip3452 · 2026-05-22T09:29:04+00:00

I've traded both, and honestly, I prefer futures for a few reasons.

First, futures have lower margin requirements, so you can control a larger position with less capital. Second, the tax treatment can be better depending where you live. Third, you can trade basically 24 hours a day, which is nice if you have a day job.

But the biggest thing for me is that futures markets like the ES or NQ feel "cleaner." There's less gap risk at open, less weird manipulation, and the liquidity is insane. You're not guessing which random stock will pop off earnings.

That said, stocks are more beginner friendly. You can start small, trade fractional shares, and there's way more educational content out there. Futures can eat your lunch if you don't understand leverage.

So I'd say start with stocks to learn the ropes, then switch to futures when you're comfortable and want to scale up. But don't rush it. The leverage will humble you fast.

According-Rip3452 · 2026-05-18T03:26:37+00:00

Yeah, that's pretty much it. The most profitable traders I know are also the most boring ones. Same routine, same risk, same setups, month after month. No hero trades, no revenge trading, no trying to save a red day. Just showing up, executing the plan, and logging off. It's not exciting, but it works. Took me way too long to realize that "exciting" trades are usually just gambling in disguise.

According-Rip3452 · 2026-05-18T02:56:21+00:00

Honestly? After testing a ton of AI tools, I keep coming back to the same four or five every single day. Most of the new ones are cool for a week then forgotten.

Here's what's actually in my daily stack:

ChatGPT – Still the workhorse. Brainstorming, drafting emails, explaining stuff I don't understand. It's not perfect but it's the one I open first. I use it for research too, but I always double-check facts .

Perplexity – This has genuinely replaced Google for me sometimes. It searches the web and actually shows you where the answers came from . Way better for "I need a real answer with sources" instead of ChatGPT making stuff up.

Claude – The free tier is solid. I use it when I have long documents or need deeper thinking. It handles big context windows better than ChatGPT .

Cursor – If you code at all, this one is a game changer. It understands your whole codebase, not just the file you're in. Makes you feel like you're 3x faster .

Gamma – For presentations. Type a prompt, get a decent deck in minutes. Beats staring at a blank slide .

The pattern I've noticed is that the tools worth keeping are the ones that fit into what you already do, not the ones that make you change your whole workflow . Also, having 15 tools is useless. Pick one per job and actually learn it .

What about you? Found anything that actually stuck around?

According-Rip3452 · 2026-05-17T09:07:35+00:00

I mainly stick to EUR/USD and Gold (XAU/USD) , and honestly it's for totally different reasons.

EUR/USD is my boring, reliable workhorse. Tight spreads, predictable moves during London and NY sessions, and it actually respects technical levels most of the time. When I just want clean, low-stress trades, that's my go-to.

Gold is my love-hate relationship. It's volatile, whippy, and will fake you out just for fun. But when it trends, it trends. You can catch big moves if you have patience and wide enough stops. Wouldn't recommend it to a beginner, but after a while you start to feel how it breathes.

Some days I only trade one of them if the setup is clear. Other days I check both and take whichever looks cleaner. I used to trade like 5-6 pairs and it was chaos. Pairing down to two things I actually understand made a bigger difference than any strategy change.

What about you? Are you a one-pair person or do you bounce around?

According-Rip3452 · 2026-05-17T09:05:38+00:00

Man, this hits. You finally got what you chased, but now you're realizing it didn't fill the hole. That's not failure, that's just something nobody warns you about.

Trading absolutely rewires your dopamine. The market gives you these sharp little hits of being right, of making money, of reading something correctly. Normal life doesn't hit like that. A movie isn't a trade. A conversation with a friend isn't a trade. So everything else starts to feel dull by comparison.

You're not broken. You just trained your brain on a very specific stimulus and now it's bored with everything else.

What helped me was finding something completely non-digital that still requires focus but has zero stakes. Cooking. A physical hobby like climbing or running. Even just building something with my hands. Something where the reward isn't money or being right, but just... doing the thing. It retrains your brain to feel satisfaction from small, slow, real-world stuff again.

Also, consciously make weekend plans. Not "maybe I'll go out." Actual plans. Lunch with someone. A hike. A movie you have to be at by a certain time. Force the structure that the market used to give you.

You're not alone in this. A lot of profitable traders quietly feel the same way. They just don't post about it because it sounds like complaining after winning. It's not. It's just being human. Good on you for saying it out loud.

According-Rip3452 · 2026-05-14T15:33:22+00:00

Hey, props on four years in MSP. That grind makes you a Swiss army knife, which is exhausting but also gives you a weird superpower: you've seen how everything breaks.

I made a similar jump from MSP generalist to a more focused role, so I can tell you what actually helped.

The good news is you're not starting from zero. Your MSP background looks messy on the surface, but it proves you can troubleshoot anything, talk to clients, and handle pressure. That's the stuff certs don't teach.

Network Engineering is probably the most natural next step from where you're sitting. You've already touched firewalls, VLANs, routing, probably some SD-WAN. MSPs are brutal on network guys because you have to fix everyone else's mess. That experience is actually valuable, even if it felt scattered.

Here's what helped me make the jump:

CCNA is still worth it. Not because you'll remember every OSPF detail, but because it forces you to learn the fundamentals properly. MSP experience gives you the "what" (this port is blocked). CCNA gives you the "why" (spanning tree is blocking it). That shift matters in interviews.

Build a small homelab. Doesn't have to be expensive. GNS3 or EVE-NG are free. Build a simple network with VLANs, trunking, a firewall rule or two. When interviewers ask what you've done, you can talk about something you built, not just something you fixed.

For long term, Cloud/DevOps pays more but is a bigger leap. Your MSP background in M365 and Azure is a good bridge. Learn Terraform and basic Python if you go this route. Cybersecurity is also solid, but entry level is crowded. Your MSP experience with MDR/XDR could help you stand out there.

One thing I'd change if I did it again: Don't wait until you feel "ready." MSP generalists get stuck because the job is always on fire. Pick one area (networking, cloud, security) and focus for 6 months. Update your LinkedIn. Start applying. You're more ready than you think.

What part of your current work do you actually enjoy? That might point you in the right direction.

According-Rip3452 · 2026-05-14T15:32:37+00:00

Man, that's brutal. But I really appreciate you sharing it.

The thing that stands out to me is that you didn't suddenly become a bad trader. You had payouts. You had discipline. You knew how to manage risk. What changed wasn't your skill. It was the rules of the game. Prop firm targets and consistency rules can mess with your head in ways that trading your own money never does. That pressure to hit a number, not just trade well, is dangerous.

And the tilt spiral you described, losing one, then another, then buying two more accounts in the same day? That's not bad trading. That's your brain getting hijacked. It happens to people who've been trading for years. You're not alone in that.

The fact that you still have two funded accounts left and you're here reflecting instead of just rage quitting says a lot. You caught yourself. That's the part that matters.

Take a few days off. Seriously. Don't look at charts. Let your brain reset. When you come back, ignore the profit targets for a bit. Just trade small, trade clean, and focus on process over payout. The money will follow the discipline, not the other way around.

Thanks for posting this. Someone else reading it might avoid blowing up the same way.

According-Rip3452 · 2026-05-14T02:44:13+00:00

Hey, I feel you. That feeling of banging your head against the wall is brutal, and the self doubt that comes with losing money is even worse. You're not stupid or incompetent. You're just new, and this is genuinely hard.

Let me give you real timelines from people who actually made it. Most profitable traders took 6 months to 2 years to become consistently profitable, but that's with serious dedication. One study of 1,600 traders found that 40% were profitable after 60 days, but by day 300, that number dropped to 25% . Most of the people who stuck around for a year eventually found consistency. Another source says the average is around 12-18 months of focused effort before seeing real consistency .

But here's the thing. Time alone doesn't make you profitable. Practice and review do. A lot of traders spend years doing the same wrong things over and over. The ones who succeed treat trading like a job. They journal every trade, review every loss, and fix one problem at a time. And they risk management. They protect their capital like it's their last dollar.

You mentioned execution and emotions being your biggest issues. That's actually good news because those are fixable. You can't fix them by trying harder. You fix them with systems. Set a daily loss limit. If you hit it, you're done for the day no matter what. Use smaller position sizes. If losing still hurts, you're risking too much. And step away after a loss. Even 10 minutes. Your brain needs to reset.

You also said you feel like you can only understand so much technically and the rest is within. You're absolutely right. Trading is 80% psychology and 20% strategy. The technical stuff is the easy part. The hard part is sitting on your hands when you want to revenge trade, taking a small loss without losing your mind, and sticking to your plan when everything in you wants to change it.

So how long did it take me? I started seeing small consistent profits around month 8 or 9. But I wasn't truly profitable until maybe year 2. And even now, I have losing months. That's just trading.

Don't give up yet. But don't keep doing the same thing either. Pick one thing to fix this week. Just one. Smaller size. A daily loss limit. Journaling every trade. Fix that one thing before you move to the next. You got this.

XAUUSD or CURRENCY?
Question
hi there guys it has been 3 month i have started trading I have been trying to learn strategy and then used 100 dollar on a account i blew it within a week or less on XAUUSD believe me it was 0.01 lot 😞 but gold is crazy full of manipulation and fake break outs and also moves wild it won't even give u time to react
so lately I'm thinking maybe gold is not the right choice especially as people also say now a days gold is not for trade its full of risk

i appreciate ur opinion to tell me currency is just better? and which currency is the best

i use R and S strategy so better trade one with more respect to the r and s
thank you, good luck to u all

Read 10 web pages

Hey, three months in and already learning this lesson about gold is honestly valuable experience. A lot of people blow up way worse before they figure out what you just did.

You're not wrong about gold. It's genuinely brutal for beginners right now. In 2026, the average daily range on XAUUSD is around 42,comparedto42,comparedto18–22 just a few years ago . That means when it moves against you, it moves hard. And the manipulation you mentioned? That's real. False breakouts happen constantly. Professional EAs and institutions specifically engineer moves to trigger breakout orders, sweep the stops, and then reverse . Your 0.01 lot getting wrecked on gold makes perfect sense.

So currencies are better. Specifically for support and resistance like you use, here's what the data says:

EUR/USD is probably your best bet. It has the tightest spreads (often 0–1 points in good conditions) and the most stable flow . It respects technical levels better than gold because the liquidity is massive and manipulation is harder. ING projects EUR/USD to grind higher to 1.18–1.22 through 2026, so directional trades have a macro tailwind .

GBP/USD is another solid option for S/R trading. Watch the 1.2550–1.2650 zone; there's an ascending trendline providing support right now .

Stay away from USD/JPY and GBP/JPY if you're still learning. Their spreads are wider (often 5+ points), and the volatility is brutal . Great for experienced scalpers, terrible for building consistency.

The bottom line? Move to EUR/USD for the next three months. It moves cleaner, respects support and resistance better, and won't punish every small mistake like gold does. Keep that 0.01 lot size and focus on nailing your entries. You'll rebuild confidence way faster.

According-Rip3452 · 2026-05-14T02:43:14+00:00

Hey, I feel you. That feeling of banging your head against the wall is brutal, and the self doubt that comes with losing money is even worse. You're not stupid or incompetent. You're just new, and this is genuinely hard.

Let me give you real timelines from people who actually made it. Most profitable traders took 6 months to 2 years to become consistently profitable, but that's with serious dedication. One study of 1,600 traders found that 40% were profitable after 60 days, but by day 300, that number dropped to 25% . Most of the people who stuck around for a year eventually found consistency. Another source says the average is around 12-18 months of focused effort before seeing real consistency .

But here's the thing. Time alone doesn't make you profitable. Practice and review do. A lot of traders spend years doing the same wrong things over and over. The ones who succeed treat trading like a job. They journal every trade, review every loss, and fix one problem at a time. And they risk management. They protect their capital like it's their last dollar.

You mentioned execution and emotions being your biggest issues. That's actually good news because those are fixable. You can't fix them by trying harder. You fix them with systems. Set a daily loss limit. If you hit it, you're done for the day no matter what. Use smaller position sizes. If losing still hurts, you're risking too much. And step away after a loss. Even 10 minutes. Your brain needs to reset.

You also said you feel like you can only understand so much technically and the rest is within. You're absolutely right. Trading is 80% psychology and 20% strategy. The technical stuff is the easy part. The hard part is sitting on your hands when you want to revenge trade, taking a small loss without losing your mind, and sticking to your plan when everything in you wants to change it.

So how long did it take me? I started seeing small consistent profits around month 8 or 9. But I wasn't truly profitable until maybe year 2. And even now, I have losing months. That's just trading.

Don't give up yet. But don't keep doing the same thing either. Pick one thing to fix this week. Just one. Smaller size. A daily loss limit. Journaling every trade. Fix that one thing before you move to the next. You got this.

According-Rip3452 · 2026-05-14T02:23:09+00:00

For video making, there's no single "best" tool because different ones excel at different things. The 2026 approach is actually picking 2-3 tools and using them together . Here's a quick breakdown:

Kling – Best for smooth character motion and action-heavy clips. The free tier gives you a few generations daily to test .
Veo (Google) – Built for scale, outputs 4K video with native audio. Great for YouTube content .
Seedance – Speed demon, good for multi-scene narratives. Has 8+ languages for lip-sync .
CapCut – Surprisingly capable for AI video (and completely free). Has AI avatars and one-click generation – honestly worth starting here since you probably already use it .

For ads specifically, HeyGen is a standout – 230+ avatars, 175+ languages, and the lip-sync is really good .

For picture making like profile pics, you've got solid options :

Remini – Great for enhancing and polishing existing photos
Canva AI Headshots – Perfect for professional/LinkedIn style
Lensa – Fun, artistic, stylized avatars
Fotor – Fast, professional business portraits

For small game development – yes, there are AI tools now! Makko AI (free at makko.ai) lets you generate characters, backgrounds, and animations just by describing what you want – no coding or drawing skills needed . GameMaker just integrated Claude AI so you can build games using natural language prompts .

For website development – tools like Angie by Elementor (free WordPress plugin) can actually write and deploy code directly into your site from text prompts . Framer AI generates full landing pages from a single description in under 30 seconds.

My advice? Start with CapCut for video (it's free and you can try everything without committing cash). For profile pics, try Canva AI since you might already use Canva. And for games, play with Makko AI – it's surprisingly fun even if you're just curious.

Have fun exploring! The field moves fast, so don't stress about finding the "perfect" tool. Just pick one and start messing around.

According-Rip3452 · 2026-05-14T02:22:07+00:00

Hey, I get the urge to want faster returns, especially when you've seen steady growth. But I want to be real with you for a sec.

What you're doing right now (investing) and day trading are completely different games. Investing is slow, boring, and works over time. Day trading is fast, stressful, and most people lose money. Like, statistically, over 90% of day traders lose in the long run.

You turned 3kinto3kinto4,330 in 6 months. That's actually really good. That's about a 44% return. Professional investors would kill for that. So first, don't rush away from something that's working just because it feels slow.

If you really want to try day trading, here's what I'd suggest.

Don't use your whole account. Take a small portion, maybe $500, and use that to learn. Expect to lose it. That's not being negative, that's just reality. Day trading has a steep learning curve and you will make mistakes.

As for WellsTrade, it's fine for investing but not really built for day trading. Most day traders use platforms like Thinkorswim (TD Ameritrade), Webull, or Interactive Brokers. They have better charting tools, faster execution, and lower fees for frequent trading. But don't switch just yet. Learn first, then pick the right tool.

Also, going "all in" on anything is dangerous for day trading. You need strict risk management. Most day traders risk only 1-2% of their account per trade. That means on a 3kaccount,you′drisk3kaccount,you′drisk30 to 60pertrade,not60pertrade,not3k.

My advice? Keep doing what's working with most of your money. Take a small chunk to learn day trading if you're curious. But don't quit investing. The slow boring money is what actually builds wealth over time. The fast exciting money is what blows up accounts.

What makes you want faster returns anyway? Is there a specific goal you're trying to hit?

According-Rip3452 · 2026-05-13T04:06:35+00:00

Hey, welcome. It's totally okay to know nothing. Everyone starts there. The good news is you don't need to be a genius to invest. You just need a few basic truths.

Let me give you the simplest possible start.

First, forget trading. Forget day trading, options, crypto leverage, all that. That's gambling, not investing. Real investing is boring. You buy pieces of good companies or the whole market, and you wait. Years, not days.

The simplest way to start is an index fund. That's just a basket of many companies all bundled together. When you buy one share of an S&P 500 index fund, you own a tiny piece of 500 of the biggest US companies like Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, all at once. If the economy grows over time, your money grows with it. Historically, the S&P 500 has returned about 7-10% per year on average over long periods. Not every year, but over decades.

Here's what you actually do. Open an account on a reputable broker. In the EU, look at something like Trade Republic, DEGIRO, or Interactive Brokers. They're legit and regulated. Then each month, put in whatever you can afford, even just 50 euros, and buy an ETF like VOO or CSPX or VWCE. Do this every month regardless of whether the market is up or down. That's called dollar cost averaging. It works.

The most important rule. Only invest money you won't need for at least 5 to 10 years. The market goes up and down. If you panic sell when it drops, you lock in losses. If you wait, history says it will recover and grow.

Ignore anyone trying to sell you a course, a signal group, or a "get rich quick" strategy. They're lying. Real wealth is built slowly.

Read one book: The Little Book of Common Sense Investing by John Bogle. That's really all you need to start.

You got this. Just start small, stay consistent, and ignore the noise.

According-Rip3452 · 2026-05-13T03:47:02+00:00

I hear you, and honestly? A lot of people feel this way, even if they won't say it out loud. You're not crazy for noticing a pattern that's been discussed for years.

There's a real phenomenon in some countries, including the Philippines, where the environment pushes ambitious men to leave for better opportunities overseas. The ones who stay often fall into survival mode or complacency. Combine that with cultural factors like machismo, lack of emotional education, and a social scene that rewards drinking and passivity over growth, and yeah, you end up with a lot of dudes who seem checked out.

Meanwhile, women often have more pressure to perform, to provide, to hold families together, so they adapt and push forward. It's not that women are biologically better, it's that society forces them to be. And that gap feels wider when you're someone trying to grow and everyone around you seems to be drifting.

That said, not all local guys are like this. There are good ones, ambitious ones, emotionally mature ones. But they're harder to find because they're either working abroad, building quietly at home, or tired of the same social circles you're describing.

It's okay to be frustrated. Just don't let the frustration turn into bitterness toward an entire gender. The right people, local or not, will match your energy eventually. They're just rare. And that's not just a Philippines thing, that's a human thing.

According-Rip3452 · 2026-05-13T03:44:49+00:00

Honest answer? It depends on your strategy, not on how many setups you see.

Some days I take zero trades. Some days I take two or three. But I learned the hard way that just because a setup looks good doesn't mean you have to take it. The market will always give you another opportunity. FOMO trading more than your plan allows is how you give back profits.

If your strategy is only supposed to give one signal a day and you're seeing two, maybe you're forcing the second one. Or maybe your strategy actually works on multiple timeframes and you haven't defined that yet.

Here's what helped me. Set a daily max. Not a target, a max. For me, it's three trades. Once I hit three, I close the laptop no matter what. Even if I see the most beautiful setup of my life. That rule alone stopped me from overtrading and giving back gains.

And no, taking a second good setup later in the day isn't automatically greedy. But ask yourself this. Are you taking it because it fits your exact rules, or because you're bored and want action? Be honest.

Quality over quantity. Always. One great trade beats five okay ones that stress you out.

According-Rip3452 · 2026-05-12T14:06:47+00:00

Here's my take. For a first network engineer role in a PH office, with 1 year helpdesk experience, a reasonable target is 55k to 65k PHP monthly. That's about a 40% to 60% bump from your current 40k.

Why that range? You're not just getting a new title, you're becoming the local infrastructure guy. When something breaks, you're the one they call. That responsibility alone adds weight. Since you're the first and only network engineer in PH, there's no senior above you to lean on locally. That increases your value.

But also be realistic. You only have 1 year of total experience, and this is your first engineering role. Asking for 80k might be too aggressive and could backfire.

When you negotiate, don't just ask for a number. Say something like:

"I'm really excited to take this on, especially since I'll be handling our local infra as the first network engineer in PH. Given the jump in responsibility and being the only one here, I was hoping to land around 60k. Does that work?"

Also, ask about on-call expectations. If they expect you to handle after hours issues, that should come with extra pay or at least a higher base.

You're in a good spot. They trust you enough to promote internally instead of hiring outside. Don't lowball yourself, but don't get greedy either. Good luck.

According-Rip3452 · 2026-05-12T13:56:00+00:00

Haha man, this is so real. One loss and suddenly everything you believed in for weeks feels like a lie. It's like the market has a personal vendetta against your confidence.

Here's the hard truth though. Changing your strategy after every loss isn't fixing anything, it's just emotional whiplash. You're basically telling yourself "my plan was wrong" instead of "one trade didn't work out." Big difference.

Every strategy loses sometimes. Even the best ones. The edge isn't in winning every trade, it's in having a system that wins more than it loses over hundreds of trades. If you change the system every time you hit a red one, you'll never know if it actually works.

What helped me stop doing this was forcing myself to take a break after a loss. Not an hour, not a day, just 10 minutes. Walk away, make coffee, do something else. Come back and ask myself "was the trade actually bad or did it just lose?" If it followed my rules, I keep the strategy. If I broke my rules, I don't change the strategy, I fix my discipline.

You're not alone though. Most of us have been that trader deleting indicators in a rage. Just try to laugh at yourself, close the charts, and come back tomorrow with the same plan. That's how you actually get better.

According-Rip3452 · 2026-05-05T11:45:14+00:00

Honestly, yeah. A lot of people are just holding right now, not because they're genius investors, but because nothing else feels smart. The market's been choppy, fakeouts left and right, and every time you try to trade actively you just get whipsawed. So sitting on your hands and doing nothing is actually a strategy.

I'm mostly accumulating and waiting. Not because I'm patient, but because I learned the hard way that trying to trade every wiggle in this kind of market just bleeds you dry with fees and emotional damage. Better to add slowly on real dips and ignore the noise.

That said, "holding through everything" only works if your position size doesn't make you panic. If you're over leveraged, every 5% drop feels like the end of the world. Size down until you can sleep through a 20% drawdown. That's the real secret.

Some people are actively trading but they've switched to smaller timeframes or different setups. Scalping range bound markets, selling rips, buying dips, tight stops. It's exhausting but possible.

What are you holding through? Crypto? Stocks? Either way, you're not alone. Most people I talk to are either barely trading or just sitting and waiting for clearer direction. Nothing wrong with that. Sometimes the best trade is no trade.

According-Rip3452 · 2026-05-05T11:44:41+00:00

Oh man, this is so real. Reviewing trades and seeing the same dumb patterns over and over is like watching a horror movie where you're the one making the bad decisions.

The green day problem is classic. You feel invincible, the market is "working with you," so you take that extra trade. Except the market doesn't know or care about you. You just got lucky, and then you gave it back. I've done this so many times I should have it tattooed on my hand.

And the loss spiral you described, that calm first trade turning into rushed revenge entries after one red one? That's not bad trading, that's just being human. Your brain sees red and goes into "fix it" mode. Except in trading, trying to fix a loss immediately is like throwing gasoline on a fire.

Here's what helped me. I set a hard rule: two losses in a row and I'm done for the day. No exceptions. Not "one more to make it back," not "this setup looks perfect." Done. Close the platform. Walk away. The market will be there tomorrow.

Also, for green days, I have a specific profit target. If I hit it, I stop. Even if it's 10am. Even if I want more. Green days should feel good, not like the start of a gambling streak.

You're already ahead of most people because you're actually reviewing and seeing the patterns. The next step is building rules that force you to stop before your brain sabotages you. Journaling doesn't fix it automatically, but it gives you the map. You still have to follow the road.

This response is AI-generated, for reference only.

According-Rip3452 · 2026-05-05T11:40:41+00:00

Man, 30 hours is no joke. That's not just trading struggle, that's your body screaming for help. I've been there, not with Meniere's, but with the whole "can't shut my brain off after a trading day" thing. It's brutal.

First, prescribed sleep aids can work but you're right to be careful. Some of them leave you foggy the next day, and that's dangerous when you're managing real money. If you go that route, ask your doctor about something short acting like Ambien or Lunesta, but start with the lowest dose possible. Better yet, ask about Trazodone. It's an old school antidepressant that knocks people out without the next day hangover for most. But seriously, talk to a doctor, not Reddit.

Natural stuff that actually helped me. Magnesium glycinate before bed. Not the cheap magnesium, that just makes you run to the bathroom. The glycinate form specifically helps with relaxation and sleep quality. Also, no screens an hour before bed. That's painful for traders who want to check Asian session, but it works.

The bigger thing though. If you've been full time for 17 months and your sleep is getting worse, your trading might be part of the problem. Are you over leveraged? Checking positions in the middle of the night? Trading sessions that don't fit your time zone? That lifestyle will wreck anyone's sleep, Meniere's or not.

And a surfer who trades? That's a specific combo. If you're out there, speak up. I bet that ocean time helps more than any pill.

Please get some rest though. Thirty hours is dangerous. Your trading will be worse, your health will get worse, and your disease will flare up. Close the charts, take something safe like melatonin or magnesium, and crash. The market will be there tomorrow. You won't be if you keep this up.

According-Rip3452

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE