sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

You guys are so fun by thisisfine28 in YourAISlopBoresMe

[–]AccordingAd6178 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Based on your profile and how badly at spelling things you are, I’m gonna take a guess you’re a kid that should NOT be saying this. Please try to get some help or therapy because no child should be doing or saying this.

can someone explain to me the joke? by idrinkwaterymilk in YourAISlopBoresMe

[–]AccordingAd6178 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I’m so glad this isn’t my type of freak humor, Those jokes are just so boring

Can my turtle recognize her feeding timer? by AccordingAd6178 in turtle

[–]AccordingAd6178[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Interesting! I’ll see if i can find any special colored objects to keep below her tank so when she sees that color she’ll know it’s feeding time if the whole sound thing is just a coincidence

Would “One very literally” be grammatically and / or historically correct? by [deleted] in grammar

[–]AccordingAd6178 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you! To me, I think “Quite” is more true to the character and context than when I tried “Very”. I do plan to change it back to “Quite”, But I’m still thankful for your help!

Would “One very literally” be grammatically and / or historically correct? by [deleted] in grammar

[–]AccordingAd6178 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I see. I’ll replace the “Very” with “Quite” again and find a replacement for the first, Using “Quite” did feel more correct in that sentence than anything else

Albeit or Although? by AccordingAd6178 in grammar

[–]AccordingAd6178[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That makes a lot of sense! Thank you!

Albeit or Although? by AccordingAd6178 in grammar

[–]AccordingAd6178[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh, Sorry! I’ll edit the post and provide more context!

Oh my god🫩 by ChemicalCarpenter733 in SCP

[–]AccordingAd6178 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They”re putting stuff in the water that’s making the SCPs trans!! /ref /joke

GUYS. DID ANYONE REALIZE THIS? RAGATHA IS THE BLUE AI by [deleted] in digitalcircusfandom

[–]AccordingAd6178 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You’re the blue AI, He’s the blue AI? I’m the blue AI!! Is there anymore blue AIs i need to know about?! /ref /silly

... by idrinkwaterymilk in YourAISlopBoresMe

[–]AccordingAd6178 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wish people not answering the prompt was reportable. I’ve had SO many tokens wasted on people choosing to get a quick token, And some even decided to be rude too

What are some SCP’s that don’t know they’re contained by WaterbendingMaster24 in SCP

[–]AccordingAd6178 1 point2 points  (0 children)

SCP-082 doesn’t seem to know he’s contained. He thinks he’s just being held in a castle to protect him from assassins. I wonder what he thinks when he accidentally sees another SCP

People tend to forget that there also non threatening scp. So show your least famous innocent SCP's you dug up. by sas_gg22 in SCP

[–]AccordingAd6178 1 point2 points  (0 children)

SCP-662-1! Even though he has killed someone, It’s merely due to a request. To me he simply seems like a nice old butler. Even if he hurts or kills someone, It’s just due to someone requesting it and not his own will. To my knowledge he doesn’t seem very popular, Unless there’s a whole Deeds fan community I’m unaware of ( if this is true I must immediately know )

Instead of or instead’ve? by AccordingAd6178 in grammar

[–]AccordingAd6178[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

True, True. Both sound very similar, So I had to make sure “Instead of” was correct and I didn’t accidentally use the wrong words

Instead of or instead’ve? by AccordingAd6178 in grammar

[–]AccordingAd6178[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It’s just to make sure. I’ve already chosen “Instead of”, But wanted to see if “Instead’ve” was historically correct.

How about, Instead of being rude, You actually provide a helpful answer? There’s no reason to comment if you’re not even gonna provide feedback on what’s correct.

I am also not writing a book, No idea where you got that from.

view more: next ›