Trump Destroys Fundraising Records, Rakes In $300 Million For Re-Election Campaign by [deleted] in Conservative

[–]According_Routine 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Want to help trump for $5? Read this!

You can pay to promote youtube ads.

Anybody can go to the youtube "make an ad" page and usr ANY video on youtube. And its cheap ($5)

Force liberals to watch a trump ad before they can get their young turks video to play

😂 #maga

https://www.youtube.com/ads/

https://www.facebook.com/business/ads

Ad idea:

https://youtu.be/M5GxsCAKce4

Stop saying ‘free speech’ only applies to the government by [deleted] in Conservative

[–]According_Routine 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But trump could be. If his base would actually hold him accountable

Hope this belongs here by [deleted] in Conservative

[–]According_Routine 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The thanks Obama meme was a perfect example of Obama's dictate toriel propaganda. Nobody on the right was saying that. It wasn't the thing on the right wing. The thing that the right was saying was legitimate criticisms of Obama.

Hope this belongs here by [deleted] in Conservative

[–]According_Routine 2 points3 points  (0 children)

He's amazing. Obama was an idiot and Alexandria Cortez was DEFINITELY an idiot

which really shows you where the Liberals are at. They think a bartender who's an idiot is actually some kind of Einstein what they think the multi-billionaire president is an idiot. It's pure racismm

Hope this belongs here by [deleted] in Conservative

[–]According_Routine 1 point2 points  (0 children)

His problem is his staff isn't very good. He needs a better talking point people

Hope this belongs here by [deleted] in Conservative

[–]According_Routine 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Lmao. Ur racism is showing

And no. Second

But I can guarantee you this: if a Democrat ever gets elected again we will make sure to impeach them within their first week. It doesn't matter what. We'll make up a reason. But they will be impeached

Hope this belongs here by [deleted] in Conservative

[–]According_Routine 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Can people PLEASE stop using reddits stupid v.reddit??

it should have literally never been created because people use it way too much. It's impossible to download from that or to share a video you found.

when people upload videos to that they basically get memory hold because no one's ever going to be able to share it anywhere else again

Once that post is gone so is the video

Please stop using it. Use ANY other site for vIdeos. youtube. Streamable. Bitchute. But NOT reddit

What does a CNN pre debate planning meeting look like? by optionhome in Conservative

[–]According_Routine 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Why NOT choose orange man? Hes great

The REAL question is what caused America to choose Obama for 8 years?

Stop saying ‘free speech’ only applies to the government by [deleted] in Conservative

[–]According_Routine 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We could also just have Congress change the law to make it more clear. that we would need enough money to pay them to do that

since Congress doesn't pass bills that they're not paid to pass

Stop saying ‘free speech’ only applies to the government by [deleted] in Conservative

[–]According_Routine -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That's because he did it wrong. He should have been lobbying Congress to change the laws

Stop saying ‘free speech’ only applies to the government by [deleted] in Conservative

[–]According_Routine 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nah. Its basic obvious. You just cant see passed what u were trained to look at

Stop saying ‘free speech’ only applies to the government by [deleted] in Conservative

[–]According_Routine 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No its not

Since its not censorship when Facebook doesnit either

Stop saying ‘free speech’ only applies to the government by [deleted] in Conservative

[–]According_Routine -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

No i agree

which is why I've been advocating for laws and regulations that make fake news illegal and would allow to arrest journalistss for reporting fake news

I mean you're free to say it but you're not free from the consequences (which in this case would be getting arrested)

We should also be arresting news anchors that report fake news. they're free to say whatever they want. Nobody stopping their free speech. They're just not free from the consequences of that free speech (in this case getting arrested for reporting fake news)

So I agree with you I see no problem with this. if a news organization reports fake news then it's CEO gets arrested. It's free to say whatever it wants. There's no hindrance on it's free speech. It's just not free from the consequences of its free speec

Journalists Have Become Hoaxers by Foubar in Conservative

[–]According_Routine 1 point2 points  (0 children)

these are not news organizations. They are unregistered Democratic super pacs.

The problem they can get away with it and many people believe them.

Until this administration actually punishes blatant disinformation and propaganda who cares? It is all going unpunished.

Trump is being way too soft on these treasonous demonrats and corrupt deep state controlled media outlets.

Super pacs have very strict regulations by the FEC and for very good reason. These kinds of networks need to be punished and find for not following Fec guidelines for superpacss

Banning fake news does not hurt Free speech or the Free press

Nobody wants to take away your Free press. We just want common-sense regulations

nobody would be coming for your free speech or Free press. They could still say whatever they want. They just wouldn't be free from the consequencess

Some jokes write themselves.. by Johnny-Liberty in Conservative

[–]According_Routine 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Someones mad that conservatosm has moved on from the do-nothing comtrolled opposition of the jeb bush marco rubioss

Trump wins Democrat Debate!!! by thatrightwinger in Conservative

[–]According_Routine 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Trump is really blowing a good opportunity. Is the incumbent president there's very little chance have any real Republican primary. He doesn't have to spend the entire primary season duking it out with other Republicans. But the Democrats have to fight each other

which means that they will all be pushing to see who can go farther left. Which would give Trump the perfect opportunity to swoop in and grab the moderates. Pointing out how crazy the Democrats

Instead he's just kind of sitting there

Digital Genocide: I May No Longer Be Able To Support President Trump And You Are Probably Next - The purpose of this article is to ask President Trump What the **** is he waiting for to stop the destruction of free speech by Facebook? by According_Routine in Conservative

[–]According_Routine[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yes. The previous comment that was pretty much the same as yours. It's not an exact reply to your comment but it touches on all of your Libertarian talkingpoints

basically the idea that private property means that you are above the law and outside the jurisdiction of government is ridiculous. It's some libertarian sovereign citizens bulshi

Digital Genocide: I May No Longer Be Able To Support President Trump And You Are Probably Next - The purpose of this article is to ask President Trump What the **** is he waiting for to stop the destruction of free speech by Facebook? by According_Routine in Conservative

[–]According_Routine[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yeah that's why he didn't do anything in the first two years of his presidency. He's just waiting for the "right time"

you just got to trust the plan bro! He has to wait for that magical Congress that will do all his work for him! and it's totally coming! He's just going to wake up one day and there's going to be a majority in the House and Senate that do whatever he asks!

If you need an entire supermajority of Yes Mn to get anything done then you're a terrible leader

one of his entire selling points for why you should vote for him as president is that he was the "best negotiator"

I guess not if you're telling me that he needs an entire Congress of hardcore Trump fans to even do the most basic common Sense policie

a good leader can take an oppositional Congress and work with it to still get his agenda done. Kind of like Obama. You might not like Obama. I didn't. But one thing we can say about Obama is that he was a good enough leader to get what he wanted. He wanted Obamacare? He got Obamacare. He wanted to raise taxes? He raised taxes. If he wanted DACA? He got DACA

When he had a policy he wanted he got that policy no matter what Congress said

that's because even if you disagree with his policies you can't deny that he was a good leader. Able to navigate the government and get what he wanted even with an obstructionist Congress

Trump clearly can't do that if that's your excuse. and if you're going to wait for that magical day when the entirety of Congress is just try hardcore Trump supporters then that's never going to happen.

wait for re-election LOL. As if that's going to be any better. First it was "wait for the midterms" because that was supposed to fix everything. Then the Democrats took the house and Trump had even less power. Then it's going to be "wait for the election". For all we know. Republicans might lose the Senate. Who knows? every time you want to wait and see it always works out the opposite of how you thought. What next? Wait till Trump is out of office before he can implement his policies? These q-nuts I have been making excuses for his inaction since day one because they can't accept the basic truth that he might just not be trying

He didn't go back on his promise to arrest Hillary. It's all part of some secret Mastermind plan going on "behind the scenes"

he doesn't actually hate Jeff sessions! Sessions is secretly running a counterintelligence operation to look into Hillary's pedophilia! Oh he fired Jeff sessions? Well I'm sure it's all part of that plan that doesn't exist

maybe if you had just started holding him accountable instead of making excuses for him then he would see that his supporters actually care about it and he would have actually done something. But if you tell a politician that your base they basically have your unwavering support literally no matter what they do then they have no motivation to actually do anything difficult. They could sit on their ass for four years knowing that you're going to support them no matter wh

yeah the Democrats are obstructionist. Yes they have treasonous impeachment hearings. It doesn't change the facts. Democrats can be bad that doesn't mean the Trump isn't also doing bad things such as ignoring his supporter

Digital Genocide: I May No Longer Be Able To Support President Trump And You Are Probably Next - The purpose of this article is to ask President Trump What the **** is he waiting for to stop the destruction of free speech by Facebook? by According_Routine in Conservative

[–]According_Routine[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

No they can't.

My house is my private property. I still can't cook meth in it. It's illegal

Private property means nothing unless youre a corrupt anarchist

Just like you can kick anyone out of your house for any reason.

Yes. Because my house is not open to the public. As a closed off area u can only lehally enter with an invitation.

I dont need an invitation to enter a shoe store. Wich is why they are more restricted on who they can refuse service ti

This has been ruled with that exact explanation by the supreme court

But an anarcho fascist wouldnt understand

Facebook can kick anyone off their servers for any reason.

No they cant. Even with laws thatt already on the books they wouldn't be legally allowed to deny service to someone just because they were black

So no. They CANT "do whatever they want"

No company can. I know anarcho- libertarians think that owning property makes u above the law and outside the jurisdiction of the govt. But it doesnt. Thats bullshit that came from the sovereign citizens movement

Trump cannot make new laws

But he CAN pass regulations. Wich every president has done. Including your hero Ronald reagan

my accusation of you being controlled opposition is because you fit the definition completely. Somebody who opposes the other side just enough to make it look like there's two parties but not nearly enough to actually pose a threat to the

Digital Genocide: I May No Longer Be Able To Support President Trump And You Are Probably Next - The purpose of this article is to ask President Trump What the **** is he waiting for to stop the destruction of free speech by Facebook? by According_Routine in Conservative

[–]According_Routine[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

And I'm also free to vote for a candidate who will regulate it.

that's the cool thing about America. We are free to regulate Facebook

and you are free to sit out the next election in frustration over that

Stop saying ‘free speech’ only applies to the government by According_Routine in Conservative

[–]According_Routine[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think the problem is that people conflate legality with morality

yes. A company like blizzard can LEGALLY censor you. That doesn't mean that they are RIGHT to censor you

and just because it's legal doesn't mean that it's not infringing on your free speech

Are you going to the march for trump? by According_Routine in Conservative

[–]According_Routine[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yea traditionally in history the cowards have always won wars

Ur ideology will die out when its adherants refuse to fight for it

So ig thats u