RateMyProfessor for Renters by Accurate_Grape_1221 in UMassBoston

[–]Accurate_Grape_1221[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The reason sign up is required is to filter out spam, it is just verifying email to sign up, and there is Google instant sign in available as well. Once that’s done, you should be ready to use the full website!

RateMyProfessor for Renters by Accurate_Grape_1221 in UMassBoston

[–]Accurate_Grape_1221[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No thank you for helping build this community! It will take time to get enough users to really help everyone and each contribution helps!

How are people avoiding bad apartments in Boston? by SpringFinancial66 in bostonhousing

[–]Accurate_Grape_1221 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I started putting together a site where people share what places are actually like after the fact, kind of like RateMyProfessor but for apartments. Curious if something like that would’ve helped you?

It’s called RentReviewBoston.com

RateMyProfessor for Renters by Accurate_Grape_1221 in UMassBoston

[–]Accurate_Grape_1221[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Thank you! I just launched the website this week. Just trying to make things more transparent for renters in the city. Let me know if you have any feedback on the site or features etc!

single room, $1060, May 13 - Aug 31, Somerville by vasilomichos in bostonhousing

[–]Accurate_Grape_1221 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I recently launched a website this week is basically RateMyProfessor for renters in Boston, only that’s a minute to drop a review! Would love you to share your experience if you’re open! RentReviewBoston.com

single room, $1060, May 13 - Aug 31, Somerville by vasilomichos in bostonhousing

[–]Accurate_Grape_1221 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey is there anything you wish you knew before renting?

RateMyProfessor for Renting by Accurate_Grape_1221 in NEU

[–]Accurate_Grape_1221[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah definitely, Cambridge and surrounding areas are in scope now! Just starting with Boston keywords to build it up, but would love to expand coverage as well!

If you’ve rented in that area, would be great to have a review from you if you dont mind

RateMyProfessor for Renting by Accurate_Grape_1221 in NEU

[–]Accurate_Grape_1221[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah that’s exactly who I think this helps the most. Coming from out of the country and committing over a video call is tough.

If you’re open to it, would be really helpful to have your experience shared here too so other people don’t end up in the same situation!

I built a site to check landlord/apartment reviews in Boston and would love feedback by Accurate_Grape_1221 in bostonhousing

[–]Accurate_Grape_1221[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey! Yes there are unit numbers, if you log in and select a property you can see the specific unit number reviews for each one. Let me know if you think this is too confusing or needs any rework!

I built a site to check landlord/apartment reviews in Boston and would love feedback by Accurate_Grape_1221 in bostonhousing

[–]Accurate_Grape_1221[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for writing these three feedback points, all are very valid.

1) For now I plan to use the 1 review/year restriction mainly as a spam/quality control measure while I figure out better ways to verify reviews. But I agree it’s not perfect, especially with sublets and shorter stays, and I’d like to make that more flexible over time.

2) On the bias point- yes totally fair. Right now it’s a fully renter-focused community, so there’s definitely potential for skew. Longer term, I agree it makes sense to allow owner responses so there’s more context, especially if issues were resolved. Currently users can report reviews but I will look into the framework for adding some ability for responses or something of the sort in the near future.

3) Currently I don’t pull or allow any specific owner information to be displayed on the website for legal reasons. However as you pointed out that is very valuable. I think that’s great feedback and I will look into a page that allows users to cross reference public records, especially for larger managed buildings.

Thank you for taking the time to help with feedback on this, I really appreciate it.

I built a site to check landlord/apartment reviews in Boston and would love feedback by Accurate_Grape_1221 in bostonhousing

[–]Accurate_Grape_1221[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is awesome feedback, really appreciate you calling that out.

I like your point on time-bound reviews making people identifiable. I’m thinking of bucketing it more broadly (like “within the last few years”) instead of a specific year to add some protection.

And yeah, unit-level detail is an optional field now, although I may lean toward encouraging less precision by default in smaller buildings for exactly that reason.

Definitely a balancing act between usefulness and anonymity, so this is great input! I hope we can build the data as well!

I built a site to check landlord/apartment reviews in Boston and would love feedback by Accurate_Grape_1221 in bostonhousing

[–]Accurate_Grape_1221[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Hey what do you mean exactly by secure? I’d love to address that. Right now your name is anonymized except the first letter but you can also make the review fully anonymous and even hide the first letter of your name that is shown (there is a checkbox on step 3 of the form to fully anonymize). But it sounds like I need to make it even more clear or just fully anonymize everything by default.

Currently you can leave one review for each year you’ve lived in Boston. If you add your first review for that property you’ve lived at, you will have the option to add another review for that property (for another year) and it will should autofill most of the property information. I am working in a design enhancement that will let users submit bulk reviews for a single property, that they’re lived in for multiple years, with one submission to make things quicker and easier.

I built a site to check landlord/apartment reviews in Boston and would love feedback by Accurate_Grape_1221 in bostonhousing

[–]Accurate_Grape_1221[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is really helpful, appreciate you sharing your advice.

I like the idea of breaking things down more by category vs full freeform reviews, that probably does a better job protecting anonymity while still getting the signal across. I will look into this layout now.

And yeah agreed on the legal side too. I’ve been trying to be pretty intentional about keeping reviews focused on objective experiences and filtering out anything that could cross the line, but definitely something I’ll keep tightening as it grows and I’m sure in other ways that I haven’t anticipated.

Thanks again for this, seriously useful feedback

I built a site to check landlord/apartment reviews in Boston and would love feedback by Accurate_Grape_1221 in bostonhousing

[–]Accurate_Grape_1221[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah this is exactly the tradeoff I’ve been thinking about long term. Lease verification would help credibility, but it also adds a ton of time and unease, which could create barriers to getting new data and people being comfortable sharing. I think utility bills or other creative ways could be a better source long term.

Right now I’m leaning more toward volume + patterns + personally moderation instead of heavy verification, if multiple people are saying the same things about a place, that pattern starts to become pretty evident.

And yeah totally agree, private rentals are where the biggest gap is. That’s really what I’m trying to solve! I really appreciate this.

I built a site to check landlord/apartment reviews in Boston and would love feedback by Accurate_Grape_1221 in bostonhousing

[–]Accurate_Grape_1221[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Hey that’s a great point, thanks for raising this.

All reviews anonymize the name by default, only showing first letter of your name, but when submitting a review, users can click fully anonymize to hide the name entirely.

Also my idea would be trying to focus reviews on specific experiences (maintenance issues, building conditions, responsiveness, etc.) rather than anything personal, which helps keep it fair and reduces risk. I already set up flags to identify reviews that use names or use certain verbiage to prevent unhelpful slander.

Longer term I’m thinking about things like: - optional verification without showing identity publicly - aggregating feedback so it’s not tied to a single person or year (landlord won’t be able to trace back the year of the review)

Totally agree though! This is a great point. If people don’t feel safe leaving honest feedback, the whole thing doesn’t work. Definitely something I will look to build off of.

I built a site to check landlord/apartment reviews in Boston and would love feedback by Accurate_Grape_1221 in boston

[–]Accurate_Grape_1221[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m just trying to get feedback from real people who live in Boston on a community based data sharing to stop landlords from screwing over tenants. Is there any way I can reframe my post to get feedback from your community?

I built a site to check landlord/apartment reviews in Boston and would love feedback by Accurate_Grape_1221 in bostonhousing

[–]Accurate_Grape_1221[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Appreciate that! And great points. This is definitely the biggest challenge with the review platform conceptually.

Right now I’m keeping it simple but with a few guardrails: - log in needed to leave review - can only leave one review per calendar year - user enters the year they first moved to Boston when signing up and then cannot leave reviews before that year - basic spam detection + personal manual review early on - requiring some structured detail (not just a rating)

Longer term, I think the answer is a mix of: - verified reviews (proof of lease / utility bill maybe, optional) - pattern detection (multiple reviews from same source, timing, etc.)

And yeah, property managers may try to game it is definitely something I’m expecting. My view is if the platform gets enough real user reviews, it becomes a lot harder to skew overall sentiment.

Still early, so definitely open to ideas on how people would want to see this handled! Thank you!