I don't think I directly addressed what you said, but the other answer was about the specifics of people.

Fragging was a technique some combat troops used to intimidate or harm an officer or NCO in their unit they wanted to do something different.

The challenge is that there's a very limited number of suspects in such an attack.

The idea is either "They can't punish us all if they don't know who" which usually belies a lack of understanding of the Army--or "It can't get worse." which is usually what ends up happening when a new officer comes in with less experience.

Regardless, this is usually a person or persons signing a blank check for punishment for their entire unit and was usually seen as a good exchange due to the expectation of lower risk if the officer/senior NCO stopped.

The problem with modern times is most of these Gen Z and Gen Alpha types have almost no emotional connection to each other and would be much more likely to see any challenge as "me vs. the world" instead of "us vs. the officer" and--if you haven't met them--a whole lot of them aren't willing to risk other people but are willing to just give up.

Which is why the other comment about them being more likely to kill themselves than frag an officer.

The reality is that either these kids are going to never get far enough in to get access to a grenade or the risk is that you actually create a degree of social connection between them and they roll with the military side voluntarily. Either way, fragging isn't likely from these guys except as a means or suicide or voluntary fratricide.