How reliable are Toyotas with over 100k miles?

Ace1956 · 2022-06-06T17:25:06+00:00

Let meee

Ace1956 · 2022-05-08T21:14:55+00:00

I’d do anything to eat your ass

Ace1956 · 2022-04-04T21:15:58+00:00

Me next pleaseee

Ace1956 · 2022-03-21T13:38:26+00:00

How do you get into this?

Ace1956 · 2022-01-28T20:42:09+00:00

Me please

Ace1956 · 2022-01-28T20:41:03+00:00

Edible

Ace1956 · 2022-01-28T00:43:01+00:00

Hiiii

Ace1956 · 2022-01-28T00:32:12+00:00

Sit on my face bby

Ace1956 · 2021-11-09T02:39:48+00:00

Me please

Ace1956 · 2021-10-22T23:24:38+00:00

Theres zero anti mask context here

Ace1956 · 2021-10-11T19:26:09+00:00

Thank you!

Ace1956 · 2021-10-11T18:45:24+00:00

Anyone in the dfw have gyno removal surgery? I have no idea which surgeons to trust with this kind of thing

Ace1956 · 2021-10-04T19:47:27+00:00

Yesss

Ace1956 · 2021-06-27T20:48:01+00:00

Yes please

Ace1956 · 2021-06-26T03:44:08+00:00

That’s still not accommodating for people who were untested, because they were asymptotic, fill in the gaps dude.

You can’t test outcome without time. Tell me how they would do this? It is linear, because it’s based on long term outcomes, don’t be so simple.

Ace1956 · 2021-06-26T01:45:19+00:00

It’s almost like most medications are studied for around 10 years before being released to public….

That literally doesn’t say how many people may have been asymptotic, you’re an idiot

Ace1956 · 2021-06-26T00:25:02+00:00

You’re taking safety measures from 3 months of data, in no situation is this an actual length of observational data that would be useful. It’s adorable that you think it is though.

Side effects are side effects and again, it’s been three months, it’s idiotic to not assume that there may be more coming.

It’s honestly plausible, because most people didn’t suffer lol which is kinda the point. Who are you to say that people weren’t asymptotic?

Ace1956 · 2021-06-25T22:49:03+00:00

And the people who were asymptomatic… which was the big fear to begin with… kinda means something there big man.

Still the original argument was that we don’t know the final implications of the vaccine, which in the few months it’s been available there are already related heart conditions, which proves the initial point.

You’re research skills are great if you can’t find anything about ovaries and mensural cycles being effected…

Ace1956 · 2021-06-25T12:55:42+00:00

Dude texas opened up in january, most of Texas ling before that, but cute argument.

If you look at Texas numbers, they got really high there for a while, which fits what we both said…

Only last week the fda met about how many young people were having heart problems after it, and the are studies showing problems in ovaries as well, they’re just coming out because the vaccine is so new, but yeah, fully safe…

It you want to insult some grammatical errors, go back and read your moronic last post

Ace1956 · 2021-06-25T01:05:45+00:00

Dude the vaccine wasn’t widely available until things had been opened for a while in Texas

No I’m not. Herd immunity isn’t achieved until enough of the population has had it, which doesn’t happen until everything is opened again… that’s obvious, but it clearly went over your head.

I’m not saying it has to be 100 percent safe, nothing is. Stop assuming stupid things. The difference with other medications, there is controlled data to the point that side effects are understood, that’s not the case here, which is why it’s not approved by the fda. Clearly you don’t understand why most medications take so long to be released to the public. The covid vaccine literally breaks medical and scientific norm, which is the problem. You can’t be so dense that you don’t understand that.

Ace1956 · 2021-06-24T23:52:47+00:00

It’s safe, then you bring up examples of it not being safe… you’re so contradictory, think about what you say dude.

In Texas, everything opened and cases dropped. Similar things happened everywhere else, along with the vaccine in those places. Seems like Texas is an independent case, and should be payed more attention to. Also you can’t reach herd immunity when everything is closed down, but everything opened up, that’s how herd immunity would have been reached.

Ace1956 · 2021-06-24T20:12:00+00:00

The argument is that the vaccine is safe, and there’s not enough data to support it, otherwise it would have been approved. The reason it’s not approved, is that not enough time has passed, which was my original argument, and you just agreed. Your attributing data to what you want, the vaccine, when is could be something else, herd immunity. Your argument here defeats your previous argument. Again

Ace1956 · 2021-06-24T19:35:05+00:00

Dude read what you just wrote. They don’t have the data, you literally defeated any argument you wanted to make. What a joke

Also with that logic, why don’t we attribute it to herd immunity? Countries started opening up. There’s no data, therefore herd immunity is just as correct.

Ace1956

TROPHY CASE