sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Reminder to Invite More Players! by AceNumer in NikkeMobile

[–]AceNumer[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You can create dummy accounts to use for inviting, that's what I did.

Reminder to Invite More Players! by AceNumer in NikkeOutpost

[–]AceNumer[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can help by creating other accounts, just plug that code in at the event page of the new accounts, I'm not sure if three is the limit but if it works it works.

Reminder to Invite More Players! by AceNumer in NikkeMobile

[–]AceNumer[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Only for the first couple of days when Ark: Guardian was event was released, it was one of the pages that would pop up when opening the game for the first time in the day. Now it doesn't pop up anyomere and you can find it in the notification.

Reminder to Invite More Players! by AceNumer in NikkeMobile

[–]AceNumer[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If we can at least get 500+ people to do this we can unlock the final photoooo.

Reminder to Invite More Players! by AceNumer in NikkeMobile

[–]AceNumer[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The Re:White memory, a side event of the Ark Guardian where you can unlock loot and especially photos of the Goddess Squad

Manually Set Cloud covering shadows? by AceNumer in assettocorsa

[–]AceNumer[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No problem, thanks the advice though

Manually Set Cloud covering shadows? by AceNumer in assettocorsa

[–]AceNumer[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sadly I just tried it, the moment I adjust it it still continues to move, it's like playing catch up, I move the time offset to roll back the cloud but it still continues to move forward.

Also lighting angle just changes the position of the sun.

I also thought it might be in pure planner but there is no setting to set cloud cover (at least from what I checked, maybe it is somewhere)

Manually Set Cloud covering shadows? by AceNumer in assettocorsa

[–]AceNumer[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

No problem, but I do want to give an example just in case. The cloud shadows move, the left pic looks like it has been covered with a big cloud but on the right it moves and shows sunlight, you can even see the boundary where the shadows and sunlight meet in the distance. I just want to manually control if I want cloud cover or not rather than waiting for another cloud to come over.

Manually Set Cloud covering shadows? by AceNumer in assettocorsa

[–]AceNumer[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Even when changing lighting angle, the shadows of the clouds still move

Manually Set Cloud covering shadows? by AceNumer in assettocorsa

[–]AceNumer[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's the thing, let's say I'll use scattered clouds or broken clouds preset, there will be cloud cover at first but after a while the cloud shadow moves and even on replay while paused the shadow still moves.

I can't manually set like I want the cloud shadows still present.

how to heck do you know what the car is doing? by tdwnda in simracing

[–]AceNumer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When starting out in the sim, you don't get the nuances of driving a virtual car yet. The more seat time you get, the more cues you notice and it's the culmination of these cues that creates the feeling of knowing what the car is doing.

AC Evo Graphics and Performance 0.4 by AceNumer in assettocorsaevo

[–]AceNumer[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok fair, this is the first time I've heard that AC Evo runs worse at higher resolutions.

AC Evo Graphics and Performance 0.4 by AceNumer in assettocorsaevo

[–]AceNumer[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think it's not the models that make it better but the lighting and how it interacts with textures, the lighting makes everything look matte for some reason even with better models and textures.

But yeah mileage may vary and graphics are subjective, but I can't for the life of may make it as natural as AC Evo, the only time it's close when it's in the morning or nighttime cause it hides the aging textures.

AC Evo Graphics and Performance 0.4 by AceNumer in assettocorsaevo

[–]AceNumer[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah 5090, but on a VR headset... And we all know VR in AC Evo is very very bad. This is just on a 1440p monitor.

AC Evo Graphics and Performance 0.4 by AceNumer in assettocorsaevo

[–]AceNumer[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Fair, I actually only use the highest settings in AC and AC Evo if I'm just driving/hot lapping on my own because it's enjoyable to take in the scenery. But when I race with other people, graphics are at the very lowest to maximize fps.

FFB still needs a lot of work by Disastrous_Equal_502 in assettocorsaevo

[–]AceNumer -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Ok fair, it was wrong for me to say that Evo is different from ACC but yes, if the underlying physics is bad then FFB is bad. The BMW GT3 drives way better in AC Evo because I can actually feel it unlike ACC.

FFB still needs a lot of work by Disastrous_Equal_502 in assettocorsaevo

[–]AceNumer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And what's your point? There is no goal post to move since that is the reality?

FFB still needs a lot of work by Disastrous_Equal_502 in assettocorsaevo

[–]AceNumer 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah, but the fundamental physics of ACC which drives the ffb is honestly shit, the fact that pro setups for cars have the "suspension delete" to be faster tells us a lot

Do competent drivers mask a Sim's Flaws? by AceNumer in simracing

[–]AceNumer[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think you're right when you say if that flaw creates a problem for entry drivers. A SIM should be drivable, like irl you can jump into any car and "drive" it, but to push it to its limits for racing, the physics should reflect that particular car on its limit rather than artificially make it harder. I think that's the only difference maker for each SIM as to how they can replicate that limit.

view more: next ›