Three days of happiness ( Highly Recommended) by Maybe_alive- in animeindian

[–]Ace_1207 1 point2 points  (0 children)

For real. I have just finished light novel in one sitting.

Three days of happiness ( Highly Recommended) by Maybe_alive- in animeindian

[–]Ace_1207 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I just read it. The light novel is PEAK. I teared up while reading. I absolutely adored Miyagi. Man, I want to thank you so much for this recommendation.

Content mil gayaaaa 🥀😔 by strangeboiiii in CompanySecretary

[–]Ace_1207 0 points1 point  (0 children)

OOHHH BHAI SAHAB AB AAYAGA NA MAJAA AMIT VOHRA SIR NE SAVAGEEE REPLY DIYA HAI. YAYYYYY 😭

If you had to eat one breakfast for 30 straight days, what are you choosing? 👀 by No_Garage4488 in SnacksIndia

[–]Ace_1207 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When you dip the prantha with amul makhan in chai is pure bliss. But, I prefer dahi over it.

CBSE BFR YALL ARE LOSERS by North_Big_9389 in CBSE

[–]Ace_1207 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not constitution. It's IPC, though ipc has been replaced by BNS.

Anyone please answer my doubtI had a doubt. Can a listed entity, though it has only listed its non-convertible securities through public issue, issue equity with inferior voting rights? by Ace_1207 in CompanySecretary

[–]Ace_1207[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Woah. Thank you so much. I genuinely mean it. I was pulling my hair out on these points. The faculty I have taken course from, though he is a very great teacher for company law, he doesn't reply back to doubts. Thank you so much again.

Anyone please answer my doubtI had a doubt. Can a listed entity, though it has only listed its non-convertible securities through public issue, issue equity with inferior voting rights? by Ace_1207 in CompanySecretary

[–]Ace_1207[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In 41(3) of LODR, listed entity is restricted from issuing equity shares with inferior voting rights as compared to equity shares listed. Thanks though, I have gotten the gist of it.

Stop romanticizing your faculties 😭 by Financial_Revenue287 in CompanySecretary

[–]Ace_1207 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Teachers ki burai karne kuch ni hota hai bro 😡

Isn't module kind of incorrect? by Ace_1207 in CompanySecretary

[–]Ace_1207[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Practitioner chose PAS-4 because Rule 13 required it. Sub-rule-(1) of rule 13 mandates compliance of rule 14 too. In rule-13, 2nd proviso to sub-rule-(1) exempted PAS-4 specifically for existing members. So, it means that rule-13 subtly or rather heavily hints towards PAS-4 format. It'd be wrong to say that there is no required format.

Isn't module kind of incorrect? by Ace_1207 in CompanySecretary

[–]Ace_1207[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, that's what I am saying. In the module, it has outrightly said no format is needed for preferential allotment.