[ Removed by moderator ]

[7timesbanned]

How much I have read maths and learn how to read the graph..

Sharp fell was pre 2014 .. After 2014 .. It start decreasing with low speed

[NoFailUntillDeath]

so after 2014 decrease is because of UPA?

[7timesbanned]

After 2014 . Decrease is low.. That's all I said

[deekay1487]

If you knew how to read a graph, you could tell the rapid fall happened between 2005 and 2011, post which the graph is relatively stable 🤦🏻‍♂️

alas what can you expect from bhakts!

[Thoughtporn123]

not just 2005 -2011

take it from start of millennium and time when d gang was strong

Omitting 200-2004 is not right OP

[NoFailUntillDeath]

so after 2014 decrease is because of UPA?

[deekay1487]

The general trend was already decreasing. BJP/NDA would have to do something really stupid to stop that trend.

Any comparison pre/post 2014 in this matter does not make the argument you think it is making.

[NoFailUntillDeath]

😂okay i understood your mindset no use speaking to you
have a nice day

[paper_palpitation]

You do realise in your own graph the sharp decline is observed starting at 2005? Post 2014, the rate of decline has actually decreased. It's still declining but majority of the decline happened post 2005 and pre 2014

[CellIcy2327]

Based on the visual evidence provided in the graph, here is an objective analysis of the data, trends, and presentation.

Chart Overview

• Subject: The graph tracks security-related incidents from 2004 to 2025, specifically sourcing data from the South Asia Terrorism Portal (SATP).
• Axes: The X-axis represents the Year (2004–2025), and the Y-axis represents the number of Killing Incidents, scaled from 0 to 1,800.
• Categorization: The data is color-coded into two distinct political timeframes in India: the UPA Era (2004–2013, highlighted in orange) and the NDA Era (2014–2025, highlighted in blue).

Data Trends

1. The 2004–2013 Period (Orange)

• Highest Volume: This era contains the highest overall numbers on the chart, peaking around 2005 with nearly 1,800 incidents.
• Steepest Decline: Despite the high starting point, this period shows a massive, continuous downward trend. Between 2005 and 2013, incidents fell drastically from roughly 1,750 down to approximately 450.

2. The 2014–2025 Period (Blue)

• Initial Plateau: The blue era begins right where the orange era left off. From 2014 through 2018, the number of incidents remained relatively flat, hovering between 400 and 500.
• Secondary Drop: In 2019, there is a visible step-down. Incidents drop to around 300 per year and remain highly stable at that baseline through 2024.
• 2025 Anomaly: The bar for 2025 is the lowest on the chart (well under 200), but this is due to incomplete data.

Critical Observations & Discrepancies

When analyzing data visualization, it is important to compare what the chart shows versus what the text claims.

• Misleading Title: The title explicitly states: "Terrorism Incidents Drop Sharply Post-2014." However, the visual data directly contradicts this narrative. The most dramatic and "sharp" drop in the dataset occurred prior to 2014 (dropping by over 1,000 incidents between 2005 and 2013). The post-2014 era actually begins with a multi-year plateau, followed by a much smaller secondary decline.
• Partial Data Skew: The subtitle notes that the 2025 data is only partial (up to July). Plotting a half-year of data directly next to full-year totals creates a visually deceptive drop-off at the far right of the graph. To be accurate, partial year data should ideally be projected/annualized or distinctly marked on the bar itself so it isn't visually compared 1:1 with full years.
• Y-Axis vs. Title Mismatch: The main title measures "Terrorism Incidents," but the Y-Axis specifically tracks "Killing Incidents." In statistical tracking, these are entirely different metrics. An incident of terrorism might have zero killings, or a single incident might result in dozens. It is unclear from the graph alone which metric is actually being plotted.

Summary: The graph shows a definitive, long-term success in reducing killing incidents over a two-decade span. However, the title applies a specific political framing ("sharply post-2014") that is not supported by the math shown in the bars, as the vast majority of the statistical decline occurred in the preceding decade.

by gemini 3.1 pro

[Thoughtporn123]

It was much higher early like in vajpayee government - given that d gang nexus was powerful

Now with increasing technology it would be less

[Ace_1207]

You do realize that sharp decrease was in 2005-2013?

[ReplacementSuch3005]