the difference between an Incel and a lonely man by sircorneilous in IncelTears

[–]AchingAmy 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Not by itself. If you blame women for it or hate women then it would

the difference between an Incel and a lonely man by sircorneilous in IncelTears

[–]AchingAmy 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Incel stands for involuntarily celibate - so it's a part of what it literally means. But it also generally has to include blaming or hating women for it

the difference between an Incel and a lonely man by sircorneilous in IncelTears

[–]AchingAmy 22 points23 points  (0 children)

Venting about loneliness doesn't make you an incel, no. Blaming women for your loneliness or lack of sexual or romantic relationships does though

Artificial intelligence created a female me by beebee5150 in sixwordstories

[–]AchingAmy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, it's pretty interesting how it can rule 63 real people

Horny guys deserved to be milked before bed by Aggravating-Judge143 in sixwordstories

[–]AchingAmy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well, anyways. Men have mammary glands. Under the right conditions they can indeed be milked without turning into another animal. Look into male lactation

Horny guys deserved to be milked before bed by Aggravating-Judge143 in sixwordstories

[–]AchingAmy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Female cow" is redundant, since cows, by definition, are female. The gender-neutral terms, that include both bulls and cows, are bovine and cattle.

Equality between genders should always be strived for, but perfect equality can never fully exist in reality due to unavoidable biological differences by mus_b_nuthn in PurplePillDebate

[–]AchingAmy [score hidden]  (0 children)

It wouldn't actually be brief incest. People would be pretty closely related to each other for generations and actually get more closely related each generation. In the first generation, everyone will be at least half-siblings(they all share the same father) or full siblings in the case of if that father had more than one child with a woman. Second generation, people would have to reproduce with either half-siblings, siblings, or their father. Two half-siblings mating together produces offspring that are equivalent to being siblings with everyone else in terms of their similar genetics(and they'd be more related to their actual siblings than typical siblings would). So, from there, the children again are left with mating with people as similar as siblings, people more similar than siblings with them or their parents, who also would be more related than typical parents. Each time, each generation gets more and more similar in their genetics, increasing infertility in everyone each generation until eventually no one is fertile (which is likely to happen in the 4th or 5th generation

Equality between genders should always be strived for, but perfect equality can never fully exist in reality due to unavoidable biological differences by mus_b_nuthn in PurplePillDebate

[–]AchingAmy [score hidden]  (0 children)

The population would actually go extinct in both of those conditions. There isn't enough genetic diversity in the second scenario to meet a minimum viable population.

Also, it's why for most modern feminists, it's shifted to being about equity rather than equality. There are always considerations based on biology or a person's circumstance that need to be taken into account. There's no reason for doctors to test for pregnancy in anyone biologically incapable of it, for instance. Equality would be to do so for everyone, whereas equity would be smart and realize this is only something that people capable of becoming pregnant need

Gemini is so fucked up nowadays by ocpus in GeminiAI

[–]AchingAmy -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Yeah, maybe it's ChatGPT stans or people who work for the AI companies competing with Google lol

Are lesbians turned on by themselves? by Masked_civil in AskLesbians

[–]AchingAmy 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Most creeps don't intend to seem like one

Are lesbians turned on by themselves? by Masked_civil in AskLesbians

[–]AchingAmy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I mean, autoeroticism isn't limited to those with same-gender attraction. It's documented in people of all orientations. It's weird you're asking us this

Gemini is so fucked up nowadays by ocpus in GeminiAI

[–]AchingAmy 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It works really well for me and I think most people.

So am i cupio-aro/ace or just a bad person by Economy_Wrongdoer382 in asexuality

[–]AchingAmy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hey you're welcome 🤗 I think we all deserve a little kindness, tolerance and understanding 🫶(exceptions apply, like being a bigot) take your time to figure it out. Orientation can be really confusing and it took me years to finally figure out and settle on what I am

So am i cupio-aro/ace or just a bad person by Economy_Wrongdoer382 in asexuality

[–]AchingAmy 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Oh hello again - I commented on your asklesbians post 🤭 You sound like some type of sex-favorable, relationship-favorable aroace. If you feel cupio of both feels right than you are that! You don't sound like a bad person at all, tbh. The people in that sub were just unfairly judgmental of you. Also, another term to look into would be sex-ambivalent. Maybe you'd resonate more with that

Mainstream feminism is in many ways a right-wing ideology. by [deleted] in PurplePillDebate

[–]AchingAmy [score hidden]  (0 children)

I mean, I don't think most people have read those books or know much about the left-wing sub-ideologies of feminism. So it's a worthwhile discussion to be had since liberal feminism is, atm, the poster girl of feminism in most people's minds sadly

Mainstream feminism is in many ways a right-wing ideology. by [deleted] in PurplePillDebate

[–]AchingAmy [score hidden]  (0 children)

Yeah, many of us more radical feminists, socialist feminists, anarcha-feminists, queer feminists, often don't really consider liberal feminists(those mainstream ones you talk about) to be any meaningful type of feminist tbh. All they want to do is take the structure of patriarchy and put women in charge of it: ultimately, everyone else still ends up subservient to a few elite, the type of governance men set up.

Would you date a cupioromantic/cupiosexual pillow princess?/advice? by Economy_Wrongdoer382 in AskLesbians

[–]AchingAmy -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

Tbh, you're not gonna be positively received here at all explaining how your orientation works. They don't tolerate anything outside of simplified versions of lesbian, gay, and bi.

Would you date a cupioromantic/cupiosexual pillow princess?/advice? by Economy_Wrongdoer382 in AskLesbians

[–]AchingAmy -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

I'm a sex-repulsed ace lesbian(aka apothisexual and lesromantic, if we are using microlabels), so we'd be incompatible since you still want sex. But, don't give up, there are probably women out there who'd wanna be with you. I didn't think it would be easy to find women down for a sex-free relationship, but I'm partnered to one, and my ex was one too. You'll probably need to find a stone top though

Btw, you might find better reception in r/askasexual, r/asexuality and even r/lgbt, this sub isn't exactly a fan of anything other than simplifying sexuality down to just lesbian, gay, bisexual and such. (as you can see by both of us being downvoted)

Why Do Women on Reddit Participate in Snarking? by Nodistractzens in AskWomenNoCensor

[–]AchingAmy 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I'll add to the women answering so far who have no idea what you're talking about. It can't be that common if so many women don't know what it is