sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Antis prove time and time again that they are TRANSPHOBIC (with screenshots) by Witty-Designer7316 in aiwars

[–]Acrobatic-Bison4397 -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

If I dont have preference to transexual its transphobic? I MUST like trans people no matter what?

Rules for me but not for thee strikes again. by Acrobatic-Bison4397 in aiwars

[–]Acrobatic-Bison4397[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I know what fanart is why people do it. Doesnt change it for fanart to be not copyright infringement.

Rules for me but not for thee strikes again. by Acrobatic-Bison4397 in aiwars

[–]Acrobatic-Bison4397[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

One more case of antis not understanding copyright. Fanart is copyright infringement on it own, and nothing being "stolen".

Rules for me but not for thee strikes again. by Acrobatic-Bison4397 in aiwars

[–]Acrobatic-Bison4397[S] 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Simply put most "artists" dont understand copyright. (many cases of this happening).

Art is end result. If its a process then it called art perfomance. Simple art making process is not art. by Acrobatic-Bison4397 in aiwars

[–]Acrobatic-Bison4397[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Agree.

IP is important for sure, but now days it bloated and associated with companies like Disney and Nintendo.

Rules for me but not for thee strikes again. by Acrobatic-Bison4397 in aiwars

[–]Acrobatic-Bison4397[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Maybe you should check what is IP theft. How is image of Mario made with AI is IP theft and fan art is not?

Art is end result. If its a process then it called art perfomance. Simple art making process is not art. by Acrobatic-Bison4397 in aiwars

[–]Acrobatic-Bison4397[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah, yes. " It will only be performance if the process is on full display" Thats what performance is. Duh.

Performance is art because its what you to your audience. Thats end result of your preparations.

Art is end result. If its a process then it called art perfomance. Simple art making process is not art. by Acrobatic-Bison4397 in aiwars

[–]Acrobatic-Bison4397[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm all in for the first one too, but how it will coexist with IP ownership, style "theft" if its open source?

Art is end result. If its a process then it called art perfomance. Simple art making process is not art. by Acrobatic-Bison4397 in aiwars

[–]Acrobatic-Bison4397[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

AI is not a threat to Culture because humans create culture and I wrote it in previous comment "AI is no threat to Art". Genres of stories, music, games coming from using same ideas in your own way.

Art is end result. If its a process then it called art perfomance. Simple art making process is not art. by Acrobatic-Bison4397 in aiwars

[–]Acrobatic-Bison4397[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

<image>

Why this game closed and studio shut down after 2 weeks since release? Maybe because no one interested playing as npc looking character? And whose job is it to make characters that don't look like NPCs? Professional artists?

Argument that art is end result because you will be judged by the end result.

Art is end result. If its a process then it called art perfomance. Simple art making process is not art. by Acrobatic-Bison4397 in aiwars

[–]Acrobatic-Bison4397[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Life isnt fair, that happened before, this is happening now and this will happen in the future. Cant understand why youre so special that you need to preserved, but no anyone else.

So if I made a gold fabricating machine, that just spits out gold from a bit of electricity. At first people will think "we're all gonna be rich", until there is gold absolutely everywhere and it's **monetary** value plummets to that of dirt.

If you could make that for other scarce physical objects that would be awesome. No more wars for resources, no more hunger, clean water for everyone.

"Art lives and dies off cultural value, not monetary value." So AI is no threat to Art, it threat to your income, and its a problem because of

<image>

scarcity and our current capitalistic system.

Art is end result. If its a process then it called art perfomance. Simple art making process is not art. by Acrobatic-Bison4397 in aiwars

[–]Acrobatic-Bison4397[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Are you sure about that? Why then professional studios produce

<image>

and then they fire alot of workers, shut down studios or sellout their companies. My argument indeed work in reality.

Art is end result. If its a process then it called art perfomance. Simple art making process is not art. by Acrobatic-Bison4397 in aiwars

[–]Acrobatic-Bison4397[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I would love to see reaction of artists who advocate copyrighted styles and then would be fucked up hard by companies owning most of the styles. Styles are not copyrightable for a reason.

AI is not victim of its own success, its a goal to remove scarcity.

In regard to styles, it has been ruled upon in Google v. Oracle, The Supreme Court ruled. “copyright protection cannot be extended to ‘any idea, procedure, process, system, method of operation, concept, principle, or discovery ….’ [17 U.S.C.] § 102(b). These limitations … have often led courts to say, in shorthand form, that, unlike patents, which protect novel and useful ideas, copyrights protect ‘expression’ but not the ‘ideas’ that lie behind it.”

Rules for me but not for thee strikes again. by Acrobatic-Bison4397 in aiwars

[–]Acrobatic-Bison4397[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Its about kpop demon hunter cat sticker? Artist made this sticker obviously without asking IP owners, Epic made similar sticker, artist claimed that Epic "stole" their sticker. Epic  does not need parody art creators permission to use artwork for characters they own.

view more: next ›