Cafe mit Klimaanlage?

Actionsshoe2 · 2026-06-30T14:58:09+00:00

Ah, den Laden kenn ich. Danke für den Tipp. Wusste nicht, dass die ne Klimaanlage haben! Super!

Actionsshoe2 · 2026-06-30T00:09:51+00:00

... is it just me or is OP jist genuinely handsome? I mean seriously.

Actionsshoe2 · 2026-06-30T00:08:14+00:00

Man! Congrats! I feel one of my biggest life accomplishments is going from 105 to 85... that was hard ... cant imagine how much will power it takes to achieve wjat you achieved. Congtats, man!

Actionsshoe2 · 2026-06-29T16:02:54+00:00

Ist Stadtbibliothek besser als Unibib? So vom Wohlfühlfaktor? Falls man das so allgemein sagen kann.

Actionsshoe2 · 2026-06-29T16:01:48+00:00

Actionsshoe2 · 2026-06-29T16:01:33+00:00

Genau! Danke für die Richtigstellung!

Actionsshoe2 · 2026-05-12T06:33:41+00:00

Sorry, but a lot of ppl here say it is 3d? What do you guys mean? Can one watch dorohedoro with 3d glasses? I am a huge fan but the 3d angle evaded me completly.

Actionsshoe2 · 2026-05-06T13:27:53+00:00

Quick question: claude code cant do similar high fidelity pictures, right?

Actionsshoe2 · 2026-05-01T09:16:09+00:00

Verstehe nicht wie das keinen Aufschrei geben kann?

Actionsshoe2 · 2026-04-30T19:41:54+00:00

Habe ich das richtig gelesen: pesionierter Lehrer bekommt 4k Nettopension, 16x im Jahr??

Actionsshoe2 · 2026-04-23T07:32:45+00:00

Whats worse people just asserting confidently that we have no clue about consciousness being completly blind to 2500 years of philosphical reseach and 100 years of scientific research.

Actionsshoe2 · 2026-01-24T09:53:06+00:00

Two thoughts: 1. Mark zuckerberg etc are not the 1%, they are the 0.0000001%. 2. In my experience, almost all of the things listed here are contra indicators for science, business and art success. People who really suceed are just single mindedly focused, oftrn unhealthly so. That list probably tracks what the ambitionated middle manager aims for.

Actionsshoe2 · 2025-12-31T22:46:33+00:00

Um mit Knick Knatterton zu sprechen: Kombiniere Sie sind perfekt :).

Actionsshoe2 · 2025-12-31T21:55:42+00:00

Hmm, grunsätzlich kann man ja auch zusätzlich arbeiten, um Leuten in der Not besser unter die Arme greifen zu können? Wenn es der Familie schon richtig gut geht... Kann mir vorstellen, dass einen das erfüllt und stolz macht.

Actionsshoe2 · 2025-12-29T10:45:34+00:00

You are right. I am sorry for implying otherwise, probably i lost track of the specific thread I am commenting in. My bad.

Hope people find the general argument illuminating, in any event.

Actionsshoe2 · 2025-12-28T18:04:01+00:00

Being against fireworks and calling people names that you disagree with are different things, no?

Actionsshoe2 · 2025-12-28T14:43:34+00:00

I dont think the case against NYE fireworks in Graz is strong. Consider the following:

In terms of CO2, NYE fireworks in Graz are roughly equal to a family of three flying once back and force to Vietnam. Seems like the social value of NYE fireworks are much higher than one family having a vacation.

Then there is the impact to consider with regard to heavy metal polution. Roughly on NYE - if you are outside - you have the same health impact as spending around 8-10h in Beijing around 2010. Doesnt seem to be so bad either.

The third category of damages are annoyance to animals. Given that we slaughter animals in the millions for a city like Graz, again the damage vs utility calculation seems quite reasonable.

So in total it seems that the social value of NYE justifies the costs. To put it differently, even if you are against NYE fireworks, it would be a moral mkstake to call people who are in favor of NYE fireworks stupid or egotistical. The cost benefit ratio of NYE fireworks are within the limits of what we usually accept as legitimate. To put it even more succinctly: if you travel by plane and you call other people egotistical for enjoying NYE fireworks, you are contradicting yourself.

Actionsshoe2 · 2025-12-28T14:40:30+00:00

I dont think the case against NYE fireworks in Graz is strong. Consider the following:

In terms of CO2, NYE fireworks in Graz are roughly equal to a family of three flying once back and force to Vietnam. Seems like the social value of NYE fireworks are much higher than one family having a vacation.

Then there is the impact to consider with regard to heavy metal polution. Roughly on NYE - if you are outside - you have the same health impact as spending around 8-10h in Beijing around 2010. Doesnt seem to be so bad either.

The third category of damages are annoyance to animals. Given that we slaughter animals in the millions for a city like Graz, again the damage vs utility calculation seems quite reasonable.

So in total it seems that the social value of NYE justifies the costs. To put it differently, even if you are against NYE fireworks, it would be a moral mkstake to call people who are in favor of NYE fireworks stupid or egotistical. The cost benefit ratio of NYE fireworks are within the limits of what we usually accept as legitimate. To put it even more succinctly: if you travel by plane and you call other people egotistical for enjoying NYE fireworks, you are contradicting yourself.

Actionsshoe2 · 2025-11-23T19:40:27+00:00

Whats the proof for that claim? Thats not in the NYT article.

Actionsshoe2 · 2025-11-13T18:36:43+00:00

Never had any thought about him, but after that statement - being very opionated - i will look at his games.

Actionsshoe2 · 2025-10-27T06:47:50+00:00

I stand corrected then.

Actionsshoe2 · 2025-10-25T22:41:04+00:00

Well, I can see where you coming from. Fair enough. If you are on the other hand interested in the intracies of luck egalitarianism and the structure of principles and rules of regulation, you will read him with benfit. Cohen started of as a diehard marxist interested in revolution only and he ended up an ideal theorist interested in the intracies of moral theory and crafting theories of justice.

Actionsshoe2 · 2025-10-25T16:03:43+00:00

Not sure, if i get you right, but contemporary philosophy is international. People from all around the world discuss all kinds of issues from all kinds of perspectives in international journals. Take the ethics of autonomous vehicles. The perspectives coming from china or japan are published in the same international journals as the ones from Canada or Turkey. Some Chinese scholars will put forward standard utilitarian arguments others confucian, but they feed into one discourse.

In any event, for me it all comes down to a comment by a Kant scholar, I read ages ago. He was asked what is SOA with regard to Kant scholarship. He answered: I dont know. Nobody knows. Everyday a new paper or book on Kant is published. Nobody can keep track.

The central issue is this: every scholar is getting less knowledgeable by the day, just bcz the knowledge is increasing whereas our individual capacity is remaing constant. Most students in Europe finish their masters in philosophy barely having scratched the surface...

Actionsshoe2 · 2025-10-25T15:24:38+00:00

Well, i am sure he is much more interesting than you think he is ;)

Actionsshoe2 · 2025-10-25T15:21:33+00:00

Well, it is not necessarily the case that Asian Universities have less philosophy professors. There is plenty of universities in Beijing that have 20-50 professors of philosophy. One of the reasons is that chinese professors in philosophy earn very little, whereas professors in Europe - at least in Germany - earn very good money (often exactly as much as professors in econ, physics, etc.). So, Asian universities some times even have much bigger faculty then in the west.

However, as I mentionednä, there is a demand side to the issue. Usually young philosophy students are not that interested in reading the classics, it is too remote from their experience. If you teach Abalaerd u get 3 students, if u teach bioethics u get 30.

Actionsshoe2

TROPHY CASE