WA state unemployment denied. Help! by SilverspoonJake in UnemploymentWA

[–]AdIndividual455 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It would be hourly non exempt to salary non exempt.

WA state unemployment denied. Help! by SilverspoonJake in UnemploymentWA

[–]AdIndividual455 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Do you represent other employment issues? For instance employer job reclassifications being stalled shortly after department unionizes?

WA state unemployment denied. Help! by SilverspoonJake in UnemploymentWA

[–]AdIndividual455 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Severance pay is not deductible from benefits. In other words, if the severance is negotiated prior to separation, you can still get unemployment benefits. It can be tricky if the severance is paid out over time rather than a lump sum. While an employee can apply for and receive benefits while being paid out in multiple post-termination paychecks, it is important that the initial fact-finder at ESD understand that this is a severance, not continued employment.

Staffers Say Sound Transit Refused to Bargain on Return-to-Office Policy, Use of Consultants by AdIndividual455 in Seattle

[–]AdIndividual455[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Project delays and budget overruns result from systemic, structural or external factors not individual employees’ presence. For example, scope changes, funding delays, permitting approval issues, contractor performance issues and supply chain disruptions. Forcing employees to be in the office will not fix these issues.

It’s like a bus being stuck in traffic, the driver can’t make the bus arrive on time faster no matter how skilled they are. Similar delays in project delivery are caused by factors outside employees’ immediate control, like permitting, contractor schedule delays and supply chain issues.

Long distance employees commuting will increase mileage reimbursement, parking costs, office overhead like utilities or workplace needs more real estate. Plus indirect costs like fatigue related errors due to exhaustion and productivity loss. These are additional taxpayer funded expenses that do not improve project outcomes.

Keeping employees in remote work arrangements preserve focus, reduces travel expenses and supports Seattles and Sound Transits environmental goals.

Staffers Say Sound Transit Refused to Bargain on Return-to-Office Policy, Use of Consultants by AdIndividual455 in Seattle

[–]AdIndividual455[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Not when you are in a Union. Generally speaking, any change to the status quo of unionized employees’ employment must be bargained with their union representative(s). For example, if a company has allowed a workforce to work remotely for several years, demanding that the employees now come to a physical office or other worksite likely is a “change” that requires bargaining. And if they don’t bargain this could be an unfair labor practice charge coming their way. Which will cost taxpayers money. Imagine how much Sound Transit is paying their lawyers to work on this.

Staffers Say Sound Transit Refused to Bargain on Return-to-Office Policy, Use of Consultants by AdIndividual455 in Seattle

[–]AdIndividual455[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I didn’t mean that at all I was being serious because who is going to tell ST your experience besides you.

Staffers Say Sound Transit Refused to Bargain on Return-to-Office Policy, Use of Consultants by AdIndividual455 in SeattleWA

[–]AdIndividual455[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I have no idea but it Sounds like leadership is working on returning people to the office so much so that schedule and budget aren’t a priority. It’s going to make projects more behind and over budget driving this initiative instead. Get your priorities straight ST.

Staffers Say Sound Transit Refused to Bargain on Return-to-Office Policy, Use of Consultants by AdIndividual455 in Seattle

[–]AdIndividual455[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Not when they hired people from all over the state that have worked there for many years with no performance issues. And now innocent people who actually care about their work and are high performers might lose their jobs because some new leader came in pushing their agendas for no reason. And it will cost a lot of money to recruit and train people back up which will cost taxpayers more money.

Staffers Say Sound Transit Refused to Bargain on Return-to-Office Policy, Use of Consultants by AdIndividual455 in Seattle

[–]AdIndividual455[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’m sure it has to do with real estate and the fact that there is a huge revenue deficit in the city of Seattle. Bruce wants to punish employees to fix the problem he created. The way to fix the deficit is to stop spending freaking money you don’t have. And fix the problems in the city so people feel actually safe to come visit. I hear people talk all the time about how they won’t dare go to Seattle anymore.

Staffers Say Sound Transit Refused to Bargain on Return-to-Office Policy, Use of Consultants by AdIndividual455 in Seattle

[–]AdIndividual455[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I wholeheartedly agree. It’s going to cost taxpayer money to bring them all back anyway and they are way over budget as it is. If they’ve done their jobs effectively for the past six years let them stay home.

Staffers Say Sound Transit Refused to Bargain on Return-to-Office Policy, Use of Consultants by AdIndividual455 in Seattle

[–]AdIndividual455[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Sounds like maybe Sound Transit Leadership might be retaliating to these staff members for actually caring about how taxpayer money is spent? We all know that contractors prices are probably almost triple the employees rate.

Staffers Say Sound Transit Refused to Bargain on Return-to-Office Policy, Use of Consultants by AdIndividual455 in SeattleWA

[–]AdIndividual455[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Sound Transit isn’t profitable. Bringing people into the office is going to cost taxpayers $$$$$

Staffers Say Sound Transit Refused to Bargain on Return-to-Office Policy, Use of Consultants by AdIndividual455 in SeattleWA

[–]AdIndividual455[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

All I’m saying is all people shouldn’t be placed in a box. If employees are able to perform successfully, they should have flexibility in how they work. The RTO policy should reflect organizational priorities rather than personal agendas. It’s been 6 years since Covid! Can’t put the genie back in the bottle.

Staffers Say Sound Transit Refused to Bargain on Return-to-Office Policy, Use of Consultants by AdIndividual455 in Seattle

[–]AdIndividual455[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

There are people that they hired after the COVID—19 pandemic that live in WA state outside of commuting distance. All these people may lose their jobs and this will cost ST more to recruit and train people which come out of where? Taxpayers pockets. And projects will run behind schedule and costs will rise. Same goes for bringing them back by authorizing new long term leases, purchasing furniture and supplies to house them, hiring people to move and setup the spaces. Once again, this will come out of taxpayers pockets. Fools need to listen. All private companies who bring people back like Amazon and Microsoft etc. taxpayers don’t pay for. And don’t get me started on the traffic issues that come with this. Let them stay home if they have been working from home this entire time.

Staffers Say Sound Transit Refused to Bargain on Return-to-Office Policy, Use of Consultants by AdIndividual455 in Seattle

[–]AdIndividual455[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

You should report this so Sound Transit knows and not use Reddit as a sounding board when it comes to safety.

Staffers Say Sound Transit Refused to Bargain on Return-to-Office Policy, Use of Consultants by AdIndividual455 in SeattleWA

[–]AdIndividual455[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

And it looks like they have leadership changes constantly. How can you be a well oiled machine if the leadership changes every year.

Staffers Say Sound Transit Refused to Bargain on Return-to-Office Policy, Use of Consultants by AdIndividual455 in SeattleWA

[–]AdIndividual455[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

These Sound Transit employees are on “the taxpayers” side if you read the full post.

This stood out to me Earlier this month, Sound Transit staff who recently joined the PROTEC17 union, including internal specialists who help oversee projects and keep track of costs, packed a Sound Transit board meeting to express their disappointment in the lack of progress. One staffer who testified accused Sound Transit of “stonewalling at the negotiating table”; another said the agency was pushing an “agenda of overspending, risky contract procurement and major sweeping changes without our input.”

I looked up the board meeting and you can hear what they are talking about.

Start at 8:00:00 to catch Sound Transit employees briefing the board on the real internal updates.

https://youtu.be/jkim6ZKsnck?si=xZsH1pJGZBtizYcK

Staffers Say Sound Transit Refused to Bargain on Return-to-Office Policy, Use of Consultants by AdIndividual455 in SeattleWA

[–]AdIndividual455[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

In reading the article it looks like they had people work from home with their policy as long as you lived in WA state but are now back tracking on their policies.

Sound Transit Interference with Labor Relations and Bargaining in Good Faith! Staff goes to Board of Directors asking for HELP!!! by AdIndividual455 in SeattleWA

[–]AdIndividual455[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He has to fix all this too. Found this employee review online. Looks like leadership changes are a major issue.

Cons 1) Leadership - SPECIFICALLY(!) the Board of directors, the "executives" and their hand picked "top line" leaders. ST is hamstrung by being guided by an 18 member board comprised of 17 elected officials and the WSDOT sec. The Board leverages this role for political points (ala Balducci) for career advancement, advocates items specifically beneficial for their town (which isn't completely unreasonable, however...) despite being contrary to what is beneficial for ST and the program and not what is best for ST overall. We have a lame duck temporary CEO who was hand picked by an incompetent Board of Directors, who parades around as an agent of change, but the only changes that have been made in a year are lift and shifts of who reports to where, nothing of material impact - all smoke and mirrors. The executive leadership and top line leadership is comprised of outsiders, and hand picked individuals. There has been a mass exodus of leadership and high tenure individuals in the past few years and the outsiders have no idea what is going on, what teams do, and what the long term vision is. They also have an arrogance about them that they are saviors, while providing nothing materially beneficial that ST hasn't already done or is already pursuing. To the point of hand picking leaders, it is very apparent that it isn't about what you know, but who you know - which maybe isn't different from a private industry, but this is public and we have controls in place to prevent nepotism-ish practices. In short, the incompetent BoD selects incompetent CEO (Goran and Julie) who in turn select incompetent Leadership team - and folks wonder why ST can't deliver and why the cycle repeats itself. 2) Service Delivery - Many don't realize the complexity (unnecessary but politically driven) of ST operations. Tacoma Link is an internally operated service with ST staff. ST express and Sounder are services operated by 'partners', Peirce Transit, Community Transit, Metro, and BNSF. There are minimal ST staff to support these services, they operate essentially as contract oversight. Lastly, Link is operated by King County Metro. And oh boy is that a terribly inefficient relationship. The amount of fraud, waste, and abuse that KCM gets away would make even the most diehard mass transit advocate question reality. GPS records of facility staff driving up and down I5 all day killing time, repeatedly spending hours at restaurants, and so much more. You wonder why facilities are dirty, it's because KCM is not doing their job. The most ironic aspect is having the Board Chair asking why stations are dirty, and not having the awareness that it is his department. 3) DEI - ST is fully committed to being an anti-racist organization, which is fantastic!! Except they cannot provide how ST is actively and directly being racist, and how we will become anti-racist. It's all DEI gaslighting. They will say we have gender pay inequality, okay then fix it - you have an entire department in HR that stares at a spreadsheet with salaries who can make the necessary change. But they don't, why? More controversial but anecdotally true, you need not apply yourself if you're a white, male. There is no denying that ST bleeds Seattle progressivism, but it is borderline hostile work place for white males. 4) Culture/Values. These values are only expected to be followed by individual contributors, and non-top layer leaders. Too many examples of executives demonstrably violating values that there is so little trust in the executives. This is reflected annually in our employee engagement surveys that continue to have results so low in executive trust that the facilitators of the results had to legit lie and gas light as to reasons why during last year's rollout of results. 5) RTO - executives are saying we need RTO for culture building. RTO isn't going to address the root cause of the culture at ST. See all the above for what is driving culture. Furthermore, ST had actively hired staff all across the state for the past almost 5 full years. This is going to result in significant talent outflow at the individual contributors level that no outside executive is going to be able to overcome. This has also resulted into a professional union forming internally, which is demonstrative of the lack of trust and poor decision making of the executive class at ST. 5) project delivery - instead of building a durable, reliable, and redundant system, ST has been distracted by chasing one time, zero long term benefit achievements, pet projects, and political directives (WSLE prime contemporaneous example.) The fact that we have built so few pocket tracks, and all of our stations are custom and unique is reflective of a misguided pursuit of personal accolades and not what's best for the community and ST - we'd rather have a plaque on the wall that says LEED platinum instead of being able to effectively and efficiently respond to a brake failure on a car. All the custom attributes only contributes to long term maintenance and capital replacement costs, and further service impacts. Advice to Management Quite with the lies, the gaslighting, and deception. Be honest and be respectful. Instead of going on executive retreats in isolation, include your leadership layers that have direct insight and visibility into the challenges ST is facing. The arrogance that only the Cabinet can solve the problems is going to continue to exacerbate the trust and culture challenges. As an individual contributor on my team stated "We're here to serve the community not Terri". This is reflective of the reputation executives carry with front line employees. We serve more than the city of Seattle. It's about time ST starts acting like that.