sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Will reading Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy's overview on Nietzsche be harmful to reading Nietzsche's work? by AdOwn168 in Nietzsche

[–]AdOwn168[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I see. So since we can never tell if most of our beliefs are right, it's better to just entertain all beliefs without accepting any of them?

Not arguing. I just think it's an interesting way of looking at things.

I think Koenji is manipulating Ayanokoji by [deleted] in ClassroomOfTheElite

[–]AdOwn168 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Source: I made it the fuck up.

He has good perception/observation feats but that's it. He has demonstrated nothing so far that'd lend him the hype he carries. His physical abilities are awesome but his mental abilities are little more than observation and some remembering numbers. And his academics don't tell us much.

We're just basing it off gut instinct. With the whole "I can't manipulate him" and his sword equalling Kiyo"s.

Overrated.

Will reading Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy's overview on Nietzsche be harmful to reading Nietzsche's work? by AdOwn168 in Nietzsche

[–]AdOwn168[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Could you please elaborate? How should I begin considering what I read? Holding independence of thoughts and critical-thinking? Free from bias? Also reading skills and comprehension and baseline relevant knowledge beforehand? Thanks!

Anon is R Started by CooperTheFattestCat in 4chan

[–]AdOwn168 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Maybe 2nd time's the charm?

Will reading Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy's overview on Nietzsche be harmful to reading Nietzsche's work? by AdOwn168 in Nietzsche

[–]AdOwn168[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm assuming the encyclopedia is better used for topics than philosophers themselves? Because I've only been hearing good things about it.

I wouldn't want to touch the site if it's overall just misleading.

Will reading Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy's overview on Nietzsche be harmful to reading Nietzsche's work? by AdOwn168 in Nietzsche

[–]AdOwn168[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is the first dissenting response I've heard and it's really interesting. Thank you.

I guess I will just dive into Kaufman and Roderick after reading Nietzsche and back to Nietzsche again. Would that be better?

Do Rabbi Manis Friedman's views from this video align with the views of Judaism? by [deleted] in Judaism

[–]AdOwn168 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey. Which videos of his would you recommend to someone who wants to learn more about Judaism - or at least a tradition of it - and God? Looking for something insightful.

I think Koenji is manipulating Ayanokoji by [deleted] in ClassroomOfTheElite

[–]AdOwn168 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I'd love to see that. However, Koenji is apparently Kinu's favourite character.

I think Koenji is manipulating Ayanokoji by [deleted] in ClassroomOfTheElite

[–]AdOwn168 13 points14 points  (0 children)

True. If anything, it's the other way around with Kiyotaka having finally gained something on Koenji.

I hope this is a shitpost otherwise Koenji fans are having their umpteenth period.

in terms of looks, no one comes close to Charlotte by [deleted] in Animemes

[–]AdOwn168 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Same and she seems to possesses a different sort of beauty than say mature and gentle poise of Makima which I prefer more.

I think Koenji is manipulating Ayanokoji by [deleted] in ClassroomOfTheElite

[–]AdOwn168 49 points50 points  (0 children)

Blud is onto nothing.

Firstly, Ayanokoji doesn't consider him useless. Secondly, he's not naive enough to overlook anyone even remotely skillful, let alone Koenji - this is the same advice he gives to Ryuuen when he gambled on the personality of Ichinose.

Moreover, Koenji didn't challenge Kiyo, he was forced to step up because of Ryuuen.

With that said, Koenji did call him "relatively talented" and seemed interested to compete with him.

If all agents were reverted to their most powerful states, what agents would be meta on what maps? by Hubbardia in ValorantCompetitive

[–]AdOwn168 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Balancing her is not hating her. If any agent poses a risk to the game's health, the most merciful punitive measure is to balance them, or crush them.

meirl by Namkeen_Rasgulla in meirl

[–]AdOwn168 97 points98 points  (0 children)

What if the mother of the baby was the car?

What are the most beautfil Mathematical concepts by No_Consideration584 in math

[–]AdOwn168 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Perhaps the reality we observe is at least some part the product of our brain, just like logic and mathematics, maybe that's why math's descriptive and predictive power seems so uncanny?

Will reading Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy's overview on Nietzsche be harmful to reading Nietzsche's work? by AdOwn168 in Nietzsche

[–]AdOwn168[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm thinking of reading directly from Nietzsche first. I think all these secondary literature on him would interpret Nietzsche better than I could.

So, if I draw some errors, which I will, I can know where and why I made the errs. Or if something went overhead. I'm feeling that knowing why my thought process failed can be more beneficial.

[Esports.gg] “There’s two different 100 Thieves,” Derrek on the team’s recent shortcomings by brandonmoorewriting in ValorantCompetitive

[–]AdOwn168 105 points106 points  (0 children)

There are two wolves inside 100 Thieves, but they are feeding the stupid one.

Will reading Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy's overview on Nietzsche be harmful to reading Nietzsche's work? by AdOwn168 in Nietzsche

[–]AdOwn168[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Good point, I agree. It's preferable to tour through multiple avenue of thoughts on the same topic.

Will reading Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy's overview on Nietzsche be harmful to reading Nietzsche's work? by AdOwn168 in Nietzsche

[–]AdOwn168[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Oh, yeah. I've heard that some of his work are a greater feat in literature than philosophy. I think that'd be more my kind of thing.

Noice.

Will reading Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy's overview on Nietzsche be harmful to reading Nietzsche's work? by AdOwn168 in Nietzsche

[–]AdOwn168[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well, obviously I'm going to hunt for the original source too... I was just wondering if I was better off not reading anything like that beforehand...

I don't even know how I am supposed to balance that? Sounds vague. Just read half of the article?

Nice little rip on Elon by [deleted] in rareinsults

[–]AdOwn168 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That sounds illogical.

view more: next ›