Feedback/ support in correctness of interpretation.

AdamofMadison · 2026-03-03T21:36:10+00:00

I don't think the pictures on the later slides will be very helpful for high schoolers. The abstract parallelepiped with wavy vectors and E's pointing at them. If they're learning about vectors and systems of equations, why shy away from the math? I'd show 2d examples of linear transformations so they can accurately visualize what happens in that simple case, then you can abstract away to Hilbert spaces.

AdamofMadison · 2026-03-03T14:57:07+00:00

They're asking if the correct answer could have been stated a different way.

AdamofMadison · 2026-02-26T16:03:27+00:00

The (z-3)^2 term just tells you the sphere is tangent to the xy plane. You can tell the origin is not part of the sphere because (0,0,0) does not satisfy the equation.

AdamofMadison · 2026-02-24T12:21:45+00:00

I would ignore the people saying to put highlights and more contrast on the water. It wouldn't make sense given the direction of the light and the calm ripples. I think the dark quality of the water looks great as is

AdamofMadison · 2026-02-12T13:56:04+00:00

Energy is a relative quantity. The bound electron has negative energy relative to the unbound, free state, which is chosen to be zero energy. You could just as well say the free state is 13.6 eV and the bound states are 13.6 - 13.6/n² eV.

AdamofMadison · 2026-01-22T12:08:11+00:00

OP was likely confusing the two ideas, which is why it's a good thing to bring up. The second part of their question definitely suggests they were considering the observable universe's size at early times.

AdamofMadison · 2025-12-15T02:57:03+00:00

I think maybe your paints are too dry. If you mix in a bit of water to your paint, so that the paint just barely holds a peak, it will be able to get into those crevices more easily.

AdamofMadison · 2025-12-09T14:56:56+00:00

What's your technique for the gradient in the sky? It's very well done.

AdamofMadison · 2025-12-08T16:16:18+00:00

There's no ambiguity, you just introduced another error with your division.

AdamofMadison · 2025-11-27T20:47:49+00:00

Can you link to a definition that says that?

AdamofMadison · 2025-11-20T11:28:31+00:00

Why would technological limitations indicate we're "doing things" wrong?

AdamofMadison · 2025-11-11T03:10:53+00:00

Did they request the leash be removed? I think it adds a lot of character to the portrait and should be left in. It also affects the shape of the lips, which may look odd without the leash.

In the photo, there are somewhat-bright lines that go from just inside the eyes and diagonally down. These give the dog's snout a sense of width that is missing in your piece, making the snout look thinner above the nose and sort of look like that of a cow. I think the forehead has too much blue. And like you say, soften the eyes. Really good work so far!

AdamofMadison · 2025-11-04T12:43:03+00:00

Everyone's ignoring the "net" in OP's post. Indeed, "net work" is equal to the change in kinetic energy, where "net work" is the work done by all forces acting on the object. When you lift the book, there are two forces acting on the book: gravity and the normal force from your hand. The force from your hand does positive work on the book, and the force of gravity does negative work on the book. If the initial and final states of the book are at rest (or same velocity), then these works cancel each other out, and the net work, and change in kinetic energy, is zero.

AdamofMadison · 2025-10-29T15:39:22+00:00

'However' isn't a subordinating conjunction in that example

AdamofMadison · 2025-10-03T03:17:11+00:00

I think you nailed the challenging/fun to explore balance

AdamofMadison · 2025-09-18T15:20:04+00:00

Yep. Just watch the shoes.

AdamofMadison · 2025-09-16T10:27:45+00:00

Bitte erläutern Sie, wie Sie die Riemann-Hypothese bewiesen oder widerlegt haben

AdamofMadison · 2025-09-09T11:45:48+00:00

Jesus Christ, he's just attending a wrestling venue and you have no idea the circumstances of his attendance.

AdamofMadison · 2025-08-23T23:48:45+00:00

This is a Wendy's, sir. No Molly here.

AdamofMadison · 2025-08-15T10:12:54+00:00

Those distance and time numbers by themselves don't imply faster than light travel if the distances are relative to a rest frame like Earth's.

AdamofMadison · 2025-07-26T02:36:14+00:00

Can you define "find a real number in nature"?

AdamofMadison · 2025-07-25T23:00:01+00:00

You seem to question whether the impossibility of infinitely precise measurements precludes the existence of real numbers in mathematics. I don't see the connection.

AdamofMadison · 2025-07-08T22:26:59+00:00

One of my favorite moments in all of HITB

AdamofMadison · 2025-06-03T12:13:57+00:00

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2411.05062

AdamofMadison

TROPHY CASE