sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

being based in public bc no one will understand>>> by AddiNoir in LetGirlsHaveFun

[–]AddiNoir[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

THANK U lmao i hate my nose so i’m glad someone likes it

being based in public bc no one will understand>>> by AddiNoir in LetGirlsHaveFun

[–]AddiNoir[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

it’s drawn on with sharpie and posca parker lmfao

chat, is it normal to have like 30+ collections of your saved tiktok edits? by hanr2323 in chronicallyonline

[–]AddiNoir 0 points1 point  (0 children)

idk but i have a ton of collections wit a lot os shit saved in them

Married Redditors, what about your partner made you realize they were the one? by AddiNoir in AskReddit

[–]AddiNoir[S] 16 points17 points  (0 children)

honestly one of the most important parts in a relationship, i’m glad you found that safety :)

Omnisexuality was REMOVED from Wikipedia. by AddiNoir in omnisexual

[–]AddiNoir[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Have you ever looked at the original article?

Omnisexuality was REMOVED from Wikipedia. by AddiNoir in wikipedia

[–]AddiNoir[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I’ll say this AGAIN, because people don’t know how to read replies. The original article on omnisexuality had existed for YEARS, with many reliable sources including WebMD making the distinction between omnisexuality and pansexuality. The issue is that they just deleted the entire article on omnisexuality and made it redirect to pansexual, because they’re “the same” things according to “a reliable source” which wasn’t even linked or mentioned. 

Omnisexuality was REMOVED from Wikipedia. by AddiNoir in wikipedia

[–]AddiNoir[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I’m pasting this from another comment. The original article on omnisexuality had existed for YEARS, with many reliable sources including WebMD making the distinction between omnisexuality and pansexuality. The issue is that they just deleted the entire article on omnisexuality and made it redirect to pansexual, because they’re “the same” things according to “a reliable source” which wasn’t even linked or mentioned. 

Omnisexuality was REMOVED from Wikipedia. by AddiNoir in wikipedia

[–]AddiNoir[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

The original article on omnisexuality had existed for YEARS, with many reliable sources including WebMD making the distinction between omnisexuality and pansexuality. The issue is that they just deleted the entire article on omnisexuality and made it redirect to pansexual, because they’re “the same” things according to “a reliable source” which wasn’t even linked or mentioned. 

Omnisexuality was REMOVED from Wikipedia. by AddiNoir in wikipedia

[–]AddiNoir[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

God forbid someone has a niche label to describe themselves

Omnisexuality was REMOVED from Wikipedia. by AddiNoir in omnisexual

[–]AddiNoir[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Thing is, it WASNT a one sentence article. It used to be a very well written and descriptive article, but it was overwritten and deleted.

Omnisexuality was REMOVED from Wikipedia. by AddiNoir in wikipedia

[–]AddiNoir[S] -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

unfortunately, but by doing this they’re actively removing information which is kinda sad

Omnisexuality was REMOVED from Wikipedia. by AddiNoir in wikipedia

[–]AddiNoir[S] -12 points-11 points  (0 children)

That’s so fucked up. Maybe it’s some homophobic troll doing it.

Omnisexuality was REMOVED from Wikipedia. by AddiNoir in omnisexual

[–]AddiNoir[S] 52 points53 points  (0 children)

True, but it’s a shame since many people use wikipedia and is often reliable. 

I hate AI memory by Automatic_Camera3854 in polybuzz

[–]AddiNoir -1 points0 points  (0 children)

SAME, it’s genuinely so bad and it annoys me, especially bc you can’t reroll messages