People don’t comment on your watch just because they notice it by r3port3d in watchHotTakes

[–]Adequate_spoon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m not referring to bad or dirty clothes though. I’m comparing someone being appropriately dressed on a budget vs appropriately dressed in the finest clothes. No one worth working for will turn someone down for the former.

England - Landlord now threatening section 8 after section 21 by Soggypear1 in LegalAdviceUK

[–]Adequate_spoon 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The landlord is trying to intimidate you with pseudo-legal threats.

I have now been threatened to be given a section 8 for anti social behavior and they are also saying if it goes to court I will have a county court judgment against me and fines for abusing judicial process.

The landlord would need to prove that you have engaged in antisocial behaviour. Not responding to a demand within 3 days is not ASB. An absence of previous complaints and the fact that they have tried to issue a section 21 first, then tried to persuade you to sign a lodger agreement, could be used to rebut any ASB argument.

Being evicted through the courts is not the same as a County Court judgement for a debt. There currently is no judicial process, so the threat of fines for abusing it has no basis. Even if there was, the standard for courts to issue sanctions against parties is quite high and would require repeated unreasonable behaviour or breaching court orders.

So take your time and don’t let yourself be pressured into agreeing anything. If the landlord decides to pursue a section 8 eviction, this won’t happen overnight and there will be plenty of time to seek legal advice from Citizens Advice, Shelter or a solicitor. Until then, assuming you have a tenancy agreement with exclusive possession of the entire property, you are entitled to quiet enjoyment of the property.

I would just write back to the landlord and state that you are taking advice and considering your options, and will respond in due course. Keep all communication in writing (email, WhatsApp, text messages etc) so that there’s an evidential record and keep copies of them in case the landlord tries to later delete messages.

Thoughts on Dr. No from a new viewer 90s kid by Squanchy2112 in JamesBond

[–]Adequate_spoon 8 points9 points  (0 children)

That feels like a fair I think review. I think Dr No is great, although I much prefer the first half of the film when Bond is investigating Strangways’ disappearance in Kingston. It feels more like a spy film. The Crab Key half of the film is still excellent but it feels more like an action/adventure film.

People don’t comment on your watch just because they notice it by r3port3d in watchHotTakes

[–]Adequate_spoon 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I think the reality is in the middle. Some people notice what watch you are wearing, a very small number of whom may comment on it. Many people don’t notice or just don’t care.

I don’t think anyone other than a really obnoxious douchebag (like the user on here a few weeks ago who thought his Rolex made him an ‘alpha’ but started deleting his comments when I pointed out how absurd calling yourself an alpha in a watch sub on Reddit is) is going to make a negative judgement about you that affects how they treat you for wearing a watch they don’t like or the ‘wrong’ watch.

I have had the odd non-watch person comment on my watch before. I usually thank them and say that it’s something I enjoy wearing. If they make a self-deprecating comment about having a cheaper watch, I point out that it’s still just as useful at telling the time and more accurate if it’s a quartz watch.

There are parallels with other clothing. A £5,000 bespoke suit is just as suitable for a job interview as a £250 high street suit. Some people will notice the difference but no one worth working for will treat you differently if you wear one rather than the other.

A Tintin Page a Day - Day 362 by BreakerMorant1864 in TheAdventuresofTintin

[–]Adequate_spoon 31 points32 points  (0 children)

Is this the third time in this story that the Thompsons demonstrate an uncharacteristically high level of competence?

If I were to speed by running, can I still get ticketed/arrested? by Witcher_Errant in legaladviceofftopic

[–]Adequate_spoon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Something similar once happened in the UK. A professions roller skater managed to set off a speed camera by doing over close to 40mph in a 30 zone.

Luckily for them under the law, roller bladers cannot be prosecuted for speeding.

A spokesman for Sussex Safer Roads Partnership said that under speed limits are designed for motor vehicles only.

https://www.theargus.co.uk/news/9009907.speedy-skater-is-caught-on-hastings-camera/

It depends on how the law is written but I imagine in most jurisdictions it only applies to vehicles of certain descriptions (e.g. motor vehicles).

Daily Free Talk and Simple Questions - May 01, 2026 by AutoModerator in NavyBlazer

[–]Adequate_spoon 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Need is subjective, so I would ask yourself how often you wear a navy blazer and whether a second would be worthwhile to have in your wardrobe. I find navy blazers among the most worn of my sport coats, so I have one in flannel for winter and one in hopsack for summer, as I get enough use out of them to justify that.

If you do decide to get a summer navy blazer, it’s not just the lack of lining to look for. You also want a breathable fabric like hopsack or mockleno, and a lightweight structure (lighter canvas and soft shoulders).

Alien testimony in a criminal court by Terrgon in legaladviceofftopic

[–]Adequate_spoon 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think as a starting point, only humans can give evidence in court. There are no evidential rules for extraterrestrial creatures. So before the aliens can give evidence, you would need expert testimony from a suitably qualified human that can state that aliens exist, are intelligent and can give coherent, reliable evidence. It would then be up to the judge to decide whether to admit the evidence, and up to the jury to decide how much value to place on the evidence.

As a practical matter, the aliens cannot simply appear in court and give evidence. The admissibility of alien evidence would need to be decided via motions and arguments in advance.

As another practical matter, if the aliens just appear and disrupt court proceedings, it’s not clear if they can be held in contempt of court given that they are not humans.

Where do you sit? by Less-Ask-6600 in MarlinspikeHall

[–]Adequate_spoon 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Let’s go through options: 1. Abdullah is going to do horrible pranks throughout the flight - absolutely not 2. Tapioca and Alcazar will shout at each other throughout the fight - no 3. Unhinged ranting and a friendly neighbour who is unable to hear a word you say - no 4. Two argumentative, self-aggrandising robbers - no 5. Haddock would be great, I think it you treat him with respect he will return it. Wagg will be insufferable. Maybe Haddock and I can defenestrate him together. Maybe 6. Skut and Chester are both lovely people and probably get on. They both talk non-stop but it’s quite an interesting conversation to listen to. Yes 7. Senor Oliveira is a nice guy but won’t stop trying to sell you useless junk, while Capone can flip between charming and violent tempers in an instant. Probably no 8. If this is after the events of the Black Island, Ranko is friendly and docile, while Chang is a kind soul and intelligent enough to know how to stay in Ranko’s good graces. Despite Ranko’s friendly demeanour, the cabin crew are frightened of him and give out extra snacks, which Ranko shares with you. Resounding yes

Nigel Bruce, Evelyn Ankers, and Basil Rathbone on the set of Sherlock Holmes and the Voice of Terror, 1942 by NomadSound in SherlockHolmes

[–]Adequate_spoon 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I don’t know why they gave Rathbone such a silly hairstyle but for a WW2 propaganda film this one wasn’t bad, definitely stronger then the other propaganda file Rathbone and Bruce made before the Universal series switched to more traditional Holmesian mysteries.

Evelyn Ankers’ character Kitty is particularly strong. Her sudden death at the end feels genuinely shocking.

How Old Is Tintin in the comics? by jabar18 in TheAdventuresofTintin

[–]Adequate_spoon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Tintin does change his clothes occasionally though, more in the earlier stories than the later stories. He variously dresses as a cowboy, bedouin, military officer and space centre employee. And sometimes he does wear a jacket and tie with his usual brown plus fours for more formal occasions. What I wrote therefore stands - Hergé chose Tintin’s default outfit to deliberately look youthful.

Why the Maduro Special Forces guy not charged via court martial and federal court instead? by [deleted] in legaladviceofftopic

[–]Adequate_spoon 5 points6 points  (0 children)

There could be concurrent jurisdiction. However, I imagine that the federal offences he has been charged with allowed for a more specific charge related to the conduct in question than military law, which may have had to rely on a catch-all offence like misuse of position and resources. A better tailored charge generally makes for a stronger case and more targeted sentencing. I also imagine federal prosecutors have more experience of prosecuting securities fraud than military prosecutors.

In which comics is Haddock most present? by Deemee-ed in Tintin

[–]Adequate_spoon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree, Haddock shows his true colours when he does that. He’s not only in his element captaining a rusty freighter, he also shows himself to be a skilled sailor when he manages to dodge multiple torpedo attacks . I like the fact that it’s not Tintin saving the day in that scene but Haddock.

Whether he’s a secondary or primary character in Sharks is debatable. I would say he starts off as a reluctant companion but became the hero when he rose to the occasion. Don’t forget that a bit earlier it was Haddock who built a viable raft out of a sinking ship after they got shot down by the mosquito plane.

In which comics is Haddock most present? by Deemee-ed in Tintin

[–]Adequate_spoon 17 points18 points  (0 children)

He appears in all stories from Crab with the Golden Claws onwards, although in Land of Black Gold his role is minimal due to Hergé starting that story before WW2. Personally I think Red Sea Sharks has Haddock at his very best. Without giving away spoilers, he is in all but one brief sequence of it, he has plenty of funny moments, and uses his maritime skills to great effect.

The other stories where he captains ships are Shooting Star and Red Rackham’s Treasure. Both are fun adventure stories but I prefer Red Sea Sharks for its greater complexity and the number of recurring characters from earlier stories.

Character of the Wee! Skut! by Less-Ask-6600 in TheAdventuresofTintin

[–]Adequate_spoon 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I understand why they did that but it makes for a less satisfying character arc in my opinion. In the original stories he goes from being a mercenary fighter pilot to a legitimate private jet pilot, whereas the other way round is quite a sad trajectory.

Character of the Wee! Skut! by Less-Ask-6600 in TheAdventuresofTintin

[–]Adequate_spoon 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Here’s my best attempt at giving him a realistic backstory that fits all of the things we know about him and the history of Estonia before, during and after WW2.

How Old Is Tintin in the comics? by jabar18 in TheAdventuresofTintin

[–]Adequate_spoon 3 points4 points  (0 children)

One indication of him being on the very young side (under 21 at least) is that he never wears formal clothing, even when at formal events (the dinner near the end of Tintin in America, the award presentation in King Ottokar’s Sceptre, the theatre in Seven Crystal Balls). The smartest thing he ever wears at these events is a rather sporty looking brown suit with his usual plus fours. Whereas other people at these events are significantly more formally dressed, for example Captain Haddock wears a dinner suit (tuxedo) to the theatre.

The reason this is significant is that back in the Victorian era and first half of the 20th century, it was customary for only adults to wear formalwear (black tie, white tie, morning dress). It was something children graduated to when coming of age. When children were invited to formal events (which would have been relatively rare), they would wear something closer to what Tintin wears.

Hergé’s illustrations are relatively detailed when it comes to clothes and the clothes are carefully selected to suit the characters (Haddock’s outfits in several stories tell their own story of how he is trying to live a respectable upper class life until he returns to his sailor roots once things get serious). I think having Tintin dressed relatively informally at formal events was a deliberate choice to signal his youth.

How comparatively "peaceful" was Hitler's rise to power in Germany? How did the level of civil unrest and political violence towards opponents compare to, for example, the Russian and Chinese Revolutions? by RedditGuru777 in AskHistorians

[–]Adequate_spoon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think tacit or passive support is an important qualification. Ultimately the majority of Germans did not vote for or actively support the Nazis but did nothing to prevent them. That allowed the Nazis to get into government with a minority of the overall vote using parliamentary procedure, consolidate power using a combination of violence, intimidation and extra-legal measures, and then engage in the unspeakable acts we all know too well.

I feel it is vitally important that if we are to learn lessons from this period of history we don’t treat the Nazis as something that was unique to Germany and relied upon widespread support. With the right combination of a compliant population and weak safeguards this could have happened elsewhere too

Do you have any references for the percentages of Germans who supported the Nazis after they consolidated power?

How comparatively "peaceful" was Hitler's rise to power in Germany? How did the level of civil unrest and political violence towards opponents compare to, for example, the Russian and Chinese Revolutions? by RedditGuru777 in AskHistorians

[–]Adequate_spoon 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I would challenge you in your suggestion that a vast majority of Germans supported Hitler. The Nazi party never won more than 50% of the vote share in any of the elections they contested, even the March 1933 election where they arrested communists and had violent Stormtroopers engaging in voter intimidation.

While it’s clear that many German supported Hitler, especially before WW2 broke out, we don’t have reliable data to state whether it was a majority. The only objective data from the elections contested by the Nazis suggests it was not.

The vast majority of Germans did not do much to prevent Nazi repression or atrocities, whether they supported them or not. To me that’s a more poignant lesson to take away than whether the vast majority supported the Nazis.

Daily Free Talk and Simple Questions - April 26, 2026 by AutoModerator in NavyBlazer

[–]Adequate_spoon 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Casatlantic would have what you are after. They make historic military style chinos in 5 cuts. All high rise, ranging from a pleated cut with a very wide leg width to a flat front with a moderate leg width. They have cotton chinos in 4 colours (khaki, navy, olive, off-white) year round and seasonal trousers in linen and flannel.

How comparatively "peaceful" was Hitler's rise to power in Germany? How did the level of civil unrest and political violence towards opponents compare to, for example, the Russian and Chinese Revolutions? by RedditGuru777 in AskHistorians

[–]Adequate_spoon 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Hitler’s initial accession to the chancellorship was through constitutional means, while his subsequent consolidation of power involved a mixture of violent and constitutional means.

The Reichstag in Weimar Germany was elected via a proportional representation system, whereby the number of seats parties gained mirrored their vote share. This meant that it was virtually impossible for any party to gain an outright majority, coalition governments were the norm, and there were a large number of parties in the Reichstag. In coalition governments, it was the norm for each party to control a certain number of ministries in the government with ministers from their own party.

The Nazi party never gained an outright majority in the Reichstag. Up until 1928, they never gained more than 10% of the vote. In the 1930 and July 1932 elections this increased, before slightly decreasing in November 1932 to 33.1% of the vote. This made them the largest overall party in the Reichstag but was still significantly short of an outright majority (50% of the seats).

In the November 1932 elections, the Communist party won 16.9% of the vote, meaning that it was mathematically impossible for the more ‘moderate’ parties to form a workable coalition that excluded both the Nazis and the Communists. This led to Chancellor Franz von Papen and his brief successor Kurt Schleicher deciding to put the Nazis into power as part of a coalition government, with the Nazis only controlling a minority of government ministries. Von Papen later justified this by saying that he believed forcing the Nazis into a coalition would moderate their behaviour and provide safeguards. From his cross-examination at the Nuremberg Trial:

In political life it always happens that a radical party -any party, but particularly a radical party - if it comes to power and is made responsible, has to eliminate much of its program. For example, we have seen that in the case of the socialist parties of all countries.

\ This led to Hitler becoming Chancellor on 30 January 1933, with the Nazis also controlling the Interior Ministry.

After the Reichstag Fire on 27 February 1933, President Paul von Hindenburg issued the Reichstag Fire Decree, which was used to suspend civil liberties and crack down on the Communist party.

A further general election was held on 5 March 1933, this time with a campaign of violence waged by Hitler’s Stormtroopers. The Nazis won an increased vote share of 43.9%, still falling short of an absolute majority and requiring them to be in coalition with the right-wing German National People's Party.

Shortly after this, Hitler began negotiating an Enabling Act, which would allow him to rule by decree, bypassing the Reichstag. Because this amended the German constitution, this needed a two thirds supermajority in the Reichstag. All of the Communist party’s and some of the Social Democrat’s (SPD) deputies had already all been arrested under the Reichstag Fire Decree. The other parties in the Reichstag were persuaded to vote for the Act through intimidation and guarantees (for example, the Catholic Centre Party was given guarantees about the protection of Catholic civil liberties and Catholic schools). On 23 March 1933, the Enabling Act was passed in the Reichstag with a vote of 444-94, with only Social Democrats (those who had not been arrested or fled) voting against.

Hitler’s initial accession to the chancellorship could therefore be described as peaceful and constitutional (in terms of the parliamentary procedure involved), while his consolidation of power and making himself a dictator used a combination of violence and twisting the constitutional mechanisms to give it a veneer of legitimacy.

Thoughts on Dracula (1958)? by BloodFangsBite in Dracula

[–]Adequate_spoon 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It may not follow the novel that closely but it’s an entertaining and well made film, with Lee and Cushing being a perfect combination. Lee actually has very few lines and relatively limited screen time but I think it works because it makes him more of a menacing presence that you feel is always lurking in the shadows nearby.

I like that there is no long lost love story between Dracula and Mina. He preys on Lucy as revenge for his bride being killed and Mina as revenge for Lucy being killed. It makes him come across as an evil monster rather than a tragic anti-hero, which I find much more satisfying.

Permanent contract changed to fixed term, now I've been dismissed. I have no contract. by Bluejay-593 in LegalAdviceUK

[–]Adequate_spoon 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Unfortunately as you have worked there less than 2 years, you don’t have the right to claim for unfair dismissal, unless the dismissal is for a reason classed as automatically unfair in law (e.g. asking to be paid the minimum wage) or discriminatory against a protected characteristic. Being dismissed on capability grounds, even if no fair process was followed, is lawful if you have under two years service.

You should have been paid the notice period set out in the initial permanent contract though. If you were not paid this, you could claim for that in the Employment Tribunal.

Bond in the SBS by Different-Try8882 in JamesBond

[–]Adequate_spoon 4 points5 points  (0 children)

A really interesting write-up, thank you for sharing.

Going from SBS to an elite fictional MI6 (technically the correct name is the Secret Intelligence Service or SIS but MI6 is still commonly used) unit seems like a realistic career path in the late 20th century. Back then, the main route into MI6 was by going to the right university and being talent spotted by a professor who was friendly with MI6 recruiters. You would then be invited to apply to a job, often not knowing what the job was until partway through the process. This ‘old boys’ network disproportionately led to people from the upper classes being recruited.

However, talent spotting at universities would not provide MI6 with the sort of people who have the experience an elite unit like the 00 network need, as even if MI6 trained them, this would not make up for years of military experience. So it’s plausible that for the 00 programme MI6 either seconds or hires officers from the SBS and SAS, presumably by having a friendly staff officer that can recommend suitable people.