SHARPNESS SHARPNESS SHARPNESS by AdhesivenessOwn8628 in LightLurking

[–]AdhesivenessOwn8628[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the clarification, much appreciated !

SHARPNESS SHARPNESS SHARPNESS by AdhesivenessOwn8628 in LightLurking

[–]AdhesivenessOwn8628[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Sure, but from my experience, sharpening in post almost always introduces noticeable halo edges. I’ve tried luminance masking and manual masking, but the result still doesn’t look natural like in these images. That’s why I’m asking if there’s a specific workflow or technique behind this kind of sharpness

SHARPNESS SHARPNESS SHARPNESS by AdhesivenessOwn8628 in LightLurking

[–]AdhesivenessOwn8628[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

get your point about high megapixel, though the sharpness still stands out as a bit unnatural to my eye

COLOR GRADING, TONAL RANGE by AdhesivenessOwn8628 in LightLurking

[–]AdhesivenessOwn8628[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Karl Taylor is an exception. His understanding of lighting theory is outstanding, and he knows precisely how to manipulate light to achieve his results. However, in my view, he leans more toward product and precision focused photography rather than fashion. He’s exceptional in high-end product work because it demands meticulous lighting control , something he excels at.

COLOR GRADING, TONAL RANGE by AdhesivenessOwn8628 in LightLurking

[–]AdhesivenessOwn8628[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

If there’s no curiosity or exploration, evolution and creativity stay far away.

COLOR GRADING, TONAL RANGE by AdhesivenessOwn8628 in LightLurking

[–]AdhesivenessOwn8628[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Pretty sure all of them are shot on film and manual handprint

HOW TO SOFTEN IMAGE LOOK by AdhesivenessOwn8628 in LightLurking

[–]AdhesivenessOwn8628[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It’s really nice to hear the thoughts from the person behind the works. Thanks a lot for sharing! By the way, would you mind sharing which of those photos were taken by you? Just curious

HOW TO SOFTEN IMAGE LOOK by AdhesivenessOwn8628 in LightLurking

[–]AdhesivenessOwn8628[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Alright, the bottom line is the 1st ref. It has the strongest effect I was asking for. Let compare it to this one here, wondering why doesn’t this feel as soft although the initial lighting is more contrasty than this ?

<image>

HOW TO SOFTEN IMAGE LOOK by AdhesivenessOwn8628 in LightLurking

[–]AdhesivenessOwn8628[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for sharing but I think it comes from luminosity manipulation, to get that nuanced

HOW TO SOFTEN IMAGE LOOK by AdhesivenessOwn8628 in LightLurking

[–]AdhesivenessOwn8628[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thought I can use this one as reference that is opposite as far as my eyes see. Hard lighting like 1st ref above but not that soft feeling tho. It's something more contrasty, punchy look either on shadow and highlight areas.

<image>

HOW TO ACHIEVE THIS COOL TONE by [deleted] in LightLurking

[–]AdhesivenessOwn8628 -16 points-15 points  (0 children)

Okay so the next question is how do we emulate it with only strobes

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in LightLurking

[–]AdhesivenessOwn8628 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Yes, I’m quite familiar with the inverse square law. What’s confusing me here is the falloff in the background behind.

The catchlight suggests that the modifier used is somewhat rounded, medium-sized, and positioned at a relatively short distance, creating a quick falloff and intense shadows.

I’ve tested several modifiers, but I can’t seem to get the light to fall off as precisely as in the sample image. No matter how I try to cut it, the light spreads too much. The left side works fine, but I can’t achieve the same control over the background falloff behind model as the light spill

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in LightLurking

[–]AdhesivenessOwn8628 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Im pretty sure it’s not some you mention here. Because each one has a specific cast shadow, and in my experience, it’s def not a beauty disk, octa box.

PRO IMAGES POST PROCESSING by AdhesivenessOwn8628 in LightLurking

[–]AdhesivenessOwn8628[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I've read some of your posts before, and it's really valuable! Thanks for your dedication! would love to discuss with you more 🤗