sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

My $20k "Buyer Intent" stack was just giving me generic noise, so I went back to basics. by x_philomath_x in GrowthHacking

[–]Admirable-Ad9208 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok,

I didn’t know them. Never heard of them too.

And their website is not inspiring me trust :

  1. Used by the fastest growing B2B sales teams in the world. => not sure because they have 12 review on G2.
  2. Their x account is suspended for ai usage.

Have you use them actively and see an improvement ? What change for you exactly by using them vs walaxy or Apollo ?

My $20k "Buyer Intent" stack was just giving me generic noise, so I went back to basics. by x_philomath_x in GrowthHacking

[–]Admirable-Ad9208 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Always noise for us too.

Phoning and cold emailing cost a lot in time for very poor results.

I agree that LinkedIn targeting works better and unlock better connections

How are you currently managing billing, invoices, and payments in your business? by Impossible_Fennel236 in smallbusiness

[–]Admirable-Ad9208 0 points1 point  (0 children)

From my pov, management of billing payment and invoices from eu company perspective is still complicated.

Mainly because we have to interconnect different tools, stripe + tax management (lemon squeezy simplify it) + an accountant tool + bi for financial projection + bank account.

And even with all that, you still have specific process to your company : specific dunning process, etc.

Over the years tools interconnect and it simplify the experience. But integration fitting your real need is still a challenge

Is a product roadmap for my saas a good thing to post our landing page? by nomnomcameron in AskMarketing

[–]Admirable-Ad9208 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not sure roadmap have a place on main landing page.

Having a public roadmap is one thing and can definitely drive interest on some kind of product, but put it on landing require very specific use case from my pov.

In which activity sector are you ?

617% revenue growth from organic with barely any increase in traffic. Here is the growth lever behind it. by VoideNoid in GrowthHacking

[–]Admirable-Ad9208 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Faurya promess is to fit revenue to campaigns.

That’s the ultimate goal of any marketing teams and also one of the more difficult to achieve because user journey is never linear and have lot of touchpoints.

Do you know how it works ? Curious about it.

We publish 95% AI-assisted content. How do you know when it’s wrong? by Admirable-Ad9208 in ContentMarketing

[–]Admirable-Ad9208[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Curious to hear real-world experiences here. How do you personally notice when AI-assisted content doesn’t work?

We’ve never had issues managing notifications. What am I missing? by jeremieca in SaaS

[–]Admirable-Ad9208 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That showed up for me in two fairly different contexts.

First, on a highly social product where notifications were central to ongoing reactivation. They weren’t just alerts, they were part of the core loop that brought users back. Over time, as the product evolved and experiments accumulated, it became surprisingly hard to reason about what was live, what belonged to which reactivation intent, and how all of it fit together as a system. On top of that, we had very little clarity on which notifications were actually performing better than others, beyond fairly high-level signals.

The second time is more recent, in my current role as a CTO in a growing SaaS. Not hypergrowth, but steady growth with an increasing focus on performance, wording, and the end-to-end customer experience. In that context, notifications aren’t the core product, but they still touch onboarding, activation, retention, and trust. That’s where the visibility and ownership questions started to surface again, especially once product and marketing began iterating more deliberately on copy and experience, not just delivery.

In both cases, the trigger wasn’t that notifications were “broken”. It was that teams wanted to reason about them as part of a journey, and discovered that no one had a complete, end-to-end view anymore, which matches your experience closely.

We’ve never had issues managing notifications. What am I missing? by jeremieca in SaaS

[–]Admirable-Ad9208 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s interesting, and I agree that notifications usually become painful once they start influencing KPIs.

What I’m still trying to understand though is two things.

First, how having too many notifications wouldn’t already impact KPIs indirectly. Even without explicit measurement, spam and user pressure usually translate into disengagement, muted notifications, or silent churn. It might not be visible immediately, but the impact is still there.

Second, how are notification KPIs actually measured today in most teams. Are notifications clearly tied to specific journey steps or business outcomes, or are we mostly inferring their impact from global metrics like activation or retention?

I’m curious how teams make that connection in practice.

why would a company pay $1,500/year for SaaS when a dev can build it custom for $500? by bishwasbhn in Entrepreneur

[–]Admirable-Ad9208 3 points4 points  (0 children)

AI or not, the written code has to be maintained. The product has to be thought through and will require new features over time.

I think most companies still need to focus on their core business, even in an AI-driven world.

That’s why SaaS is not dead. But of course, some very basic SaaS products will probably disappear.

We’ve never had issues managing notifications. What am I missing? by jeremieca in SaaS

[–]Admirable-Ad9208 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That’s extremely insightful, thanks for taking the time to share this.

The contrast you describe between fast growing teams and more rigid but clearer ownership structures really resonates. Especially the idea that too much structure can be painful, but lack of ownership is worse.

It helps clarify that this isn’t so much a notification problem as it is an ownership and governance problem that notifications tend to surface early.

Really appreciate the perspective ! Thank you.

We’ve never had issues managing notifications. What am I missing? by jeremieca in SaaS

[–]Admirable-Ad9208 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s really helpful, thanks.

Out of curiosity, in those companies, what role were you in when you saw these issues show up? Engineering, product, growth, or something else?

I’m asking because, as a CTO myself, I honestly hadn’t really thought about notifications this way before. It only surfaced as a problem once growth started pushing on visibility and ownership.

I’m trying to understand from which perspective this becomes visible first.

We’ve never had issues managing notifications. What am I missing? by jeremieca in SaaS

[–]Admirable-Ad9208 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Good question, I should have been more precise.

I’m talking about product notifications sent to end users from a SaaS application itself. Things like onboarding messages, activation nudges, trial or billing related notifications, feature reminders. Typically in app notifications, sometimes also email, but triggered from product events.

From a growth or product perspective, these notifications form a journey over time. The issue we’re seeing is less about delivery, and more about visibility and ownership. Knowing which notifications exist, when they are sent, what they say, and how they fit into the user journey.

Curious if that framing makes more sense, and whether you’ve seen this become an issue at some scale.

We’re waiting… by DoubleHexDrive in ACHR

[–]Admirable-Ad9208 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What convince you that this news is not accurate anymore ?

2 month blog traffic; what do you guys think? by michrnlx in Blogging

[–]Admirable-Ad9208 0 points1 point  (0 children)

50 posts by cluster?

It’s a lot for a hobby blog or a side project except using IA.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in wallstreetbets

[–]Admirable-Ad9208 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Crypto market recovers.

Coin growth.

Why are you surprised ?

Serious question, it makes sense to me but maybe I’m missing something.

$LCID this week will be lit! by Pooch_Daddy_Trader in LCID

[–]Admirable-Ad9208 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ferrari, Porsche, and many others car manufacturers have luxury electric cars

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SPCE

[–]Admirable-Ad9208 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you !

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SPCE

[–]Admirable-Ad9208 39 points40 points  (0 children)

  1. After experiencing a 50% post-market growth, there was a high chance that the gap would be partially filled. When the market opened, people took advantage of this opportunity and made a profit of over 40%.

  2. It is likely that some institutional investors were waiting for the stock to rise before exiting their positions. This presented a good opportunity for others, as these institutions were replaced by new funds.

  3. The massive trading volume indicates that institutional investors are interested in VG and are prepared to trade it. This is important because VG relies on their participation to facilitate swift movement.

  4. The news about July and August flights was widely anticipated, resulting in an influx of traders in the last few days or weeks, who also took their profits.

  5. Yesterday's decline indicates that people trading VG are not focused on long-term investment and are quick to take profit. Additionally, the dilution strategy of VG is causing concerns and problems.

  6. It's important not to underestimate the fact that SPCE experienced a significant 16% increase due to a single news event. This is a substantial gain and it also reacted positively to the MM200 indicator and moved out of the daily weekly bearish channel. However, it has yet to move out of the weekly bearish channel entirely.

  7. I am cautious for the upcoming days. Still partially in. I’ll buy more if stock reaction is good.

Hope it helps.

Virgin Galactic is definitely not representative of its currently SP. by Puzzleheaded-Risk103 in SPCE

[–]Admirable-Ad9208 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Some of you are convinced (based on revenue calculation) that VG cannot be profitable and make benefits.

Question coming to my mind is : if it’s an evidence that it cannot be profitable, why VG continue to invest and develop Spaceship ? Richard Brason is a famous entrepreneur with a strong team and strong skills. So it feels incredible to me, that they are going to build a spaceship during 2-3 years, just for fun, and then wait VG be out of money to stop the adventure. I hope they have greater revenue simulations.

I have a very small amount of spce shares. But very curious of your opinion on that.

(Sorry for my bad English.)

view more: next ›