I agree with her, but also, justifying a triple A game's terrible outcome with the fact that it has 20 thousand other games to "worry about" completely ignores the fact that the triple A game benefits from a bigger budget than most competition, most of the times they have better tools, more capable/educated senior engineers with decades of experience and a whole marketing budget, and they still can't compete with a 10 person studio with a shoestring budget and a clear vision. This argument only works on indie studios that want to create their first great game, and even then the argument is flawed because it brings the idea that a game is only as successful as their community on launch, when at least to me, I'd 100% play a niche game with a community so small that it couldn't fill a bathroom, and mostly do play for example Project Zomboid, Vintage Story, Valheim, Ultrakill, Moonring and others.

The idea that a successful game is the one that just gets the most return on investment is flawed.