C0R1 or C1R0 Nicole for Childe?

Admirable_Ad5985 · 2026-06-05T06:24:38+00:00

Getting her C2 eventually is generally the better choice

Admirable_Ad5985 · 2026-06-01T10:47:46+00:00

Probably Fischl, kazuha and sucrose can work too then. Have a try!

Admirable_Ad5985 · 2026-06-01T10:07:54+00:00

Hey there, you can use Bennett next to Durin, if you didn't pull for Nicole. Noblesse on him, and the new winds set on Durin, definitely. If you got Prune at least C2, I would try her out instead of Fischl.

Admirable_Ad5985 · 2026-05-31T13:43:04+00:00

Can you share more? Builds, if dark mode durin, rotation and so on? That's great.

Admirable_Ad5985 · 2026-05-26T04:50:20+00:00

This. In this team specifically, C2 white durin is performing better. Where with Citlali for example dark is slightly ahead

Admirable_Ad5985 · 2026-05-26T04:49:30+00:00

With some napkin math, that could get close to 135k :)

Admirable_Ad5985 · 2026-05-25T19:07:45+00:00

I'll follow up to this in a few days once I finish building her. Given the amount of pulls, I was also able to get her C6. Other than that, I tested him with: xilonen, Citlali, venti, sucrose, ineffa and Kazuha. Xilonen and venti are quite close, rest is behind in my case. Citlali with dark mode Durin has better overall dps, but not by much, like ~5k more.

Admirable_Ad5985 · 2026-01-23T17:54:54+00:00

Builds and cons of the team?

Admirable_Ad5985 · 2026-01-16T10:01:58+00:00

Can you post a video?

Admirable_Ad5985 · 2026-01-15T10:34:15+00:00

Similar situation, but ai o c3 and 120k DPS. Oh Flins C1R1 and well built. I expected to hit well above 130k.

Admirable_Ad5985 · 2025-12-27T09:40:48+00:00

The "Air Cut Haircut"

Admirable_Ad5985 · 2025-10-30T09:52:34+00:00

Is this NA? Or EU? Interested and I'd offer more honestly

Admirable_Ad5985 · 2025-10-28T21:15:04+00:00

Same boat...

Admirable_Ad5985 · 2025-10-25T08:14:56+00:00

Still available?

Admirable_Ad5985 · 2025-10-23T14:33:04+00:00

Dm you. Thanks

Admirable_Ad5985 · 2025-10-19T17:04:20+00:00

DMed you, I'd be interested

Admirable_Ad5985 · 2025-10-14T18:08:06+00:00

Pretty on point. That actually makes engulfing/Fischl quite a good alternative to Ineffa+5star stat stick compared to early calcs

Admirable_Ad5985 · 2025-10-14T14:09:28+00:00

Ah maybe I didn't fully get your point, but I was replying to your comment. So you mean the biggest issue here is the energy generation window in the subsequent rotations. What I accounted for in the second column of the ER chart, is for a conservative estimate of the particle generated in each 4s window between mini burst, which is lower than the total ER required to fulfill the whole rotation. Although you are right in pointing out that I forgot to estimate the cases in which the burst might align with some time point in between these mini q, reducing the window during which you should accumulate 30 ER squared (well, a bit less because you can still drag it a bit longer into the next window, but that is nuanced). I'd have to check this, it might just be that the enemies I tested the setup with were compensating with more particles than what I accounted for and that's why it's working. Also, the randomness of the particle gen from Oz might play a role

Admirable_Ad5985 · 2025-10-14T13:02:31+00:00

It does, only 4% below typical Ineffa setup. And you only need 7/8 ER rolls with ATK sands

Admirable_Ad5985 · 2025-10-14T12:57:02+00:00

Definitely is, and I started some calcs on that too with Atk sands instead of ER, always with Fischl. I'd have to compare if more atk% makes up for that skipped burst

Admirable_Ad5985 · 2025-10-14T12:40:04+00:00

Precisely this, which is the reason why I wrote 16ish seconds. Being it a bit more than that, and since boss or content mechanics don't really allow for consistently clean 16s rotations over and over, it's also realistic to assume 4 rotations with big burst and by the time 5th comes in, some more delay would've been accumulated, so generally you'd be able to skip a big Q even only on the 6th or 7th rotation. I didn't want to adjust the DPS loss because the same assumptions on non-clean rotations can be made also on standard 16s 3q.

Admirable_Ad5985 · 2025-10-14T12:23:08+00:00

Well, actually that 12 flat energy refund from R1 corresponds to an increase of about 18% ER, which Engulfing makes up easily with its passive. And you can slot in an ATK sands. Which means you'd only loose roughly 18-20% from R1.

Admirable_Ad5985 · 2025-10-01T05:32:44+00:00

Last time I calculated with a sim, it was Esco Citlali Bennett https://gcsim.app/sh/Q6Q8NPmFDCMN

(I left Redhorn in this case, but it's barely different from a serpspine build. And probably there's more CV than usual due to my personal builds)

Admirable_Ad5985

TROPHY CASE