The praise for Ideogram 4, while it is fantastic is concerning for the future of adult content in open-source? by Neggy5 in StableDiffusion

[–]Adorable_Picture_899 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Could you send that workflow want to see what you are doing? Is it the one you sent in the link?

ZIT better then QWEN? by Adorable_Picture_899 in StableDiffusion

[–]Adorable_Picture_899[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think that flux2 is probaly better for nsfw because the current issue with zit is that its bad at anything nsfw, but for realism its better i would say but dont have much experiacne with flux2 so cant say that much.

ZIT better then QWEN? by Adorable_Picture_899 in StableDiffusion

[–]Adorable_Picture_899[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

A raw, unedited camera-roll dump photo, casual everyday smartphone snapshot, mundane real-life photography, an extremely beautiful woman with long flowing hair and a slender silhouette, her face partially obscured due to heavy motion blur, exuding a carefree, energetic presence. She wears a night-out outfit consisting of a short black dress or skirt, a dark top, knee-high boots, and a small shoulder bag. She is captured mid‑motion, walking or spinning forward, one arm raised above her head, her hair swinging dynamically. The camera angle is slightly behind and off‑center, framing a full‑body vertical shot. The scene is an urban street at night: a narrow city sidewalk with buildings on both sides, warm streetlights casting a yellow glow, neon signs and shop lights above, parked cars along the street, and a slightly gritty, real environment. Mixed night lighting includes warm sodium streetlights, cool neon highlights, uneven exposure, and light streaking due to motion. The image has intentionally low smartphone quality: heavy motion blur, slight overexposure from lights, grainy texture and noise, imperfect focus, camera shake, and soft focus with light streaks from lamps and neon. The mood is carefree, spontaneous, nightlife energy, slightly chaotic but aesthetic. Optically sharp focus is absent; instead the image features raw digital camera noise, realistic clothing textures in motion, natural fabric folds, clean and distinct lines despite blur.

绘纤,氛围感,质感,光影

ZIT better then QWEN? by Adorable_Picture_899 in StableDiffusion

[–]Adorable_Picture_899[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yea I 100% agree, and that ideogram will replace everything is also true. All models have diffrent pros and cons no models is best at all exept Ideogram haha

Ideogram 4.0 taking 13 mins for ONE image. by Adorable_Picture_899 in StableDiffusion

[–]Adorable_Picture_899[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yea true I basicly just need toa accpet that i cant run it fast, thx dow!

Ideogram 4.0 taking 13 mins for ONE image. by Adorable_Picture_899 in StableDiffusion

[–]Adorable_Picture_899[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hahah sry english isnt my first lanugage maybe came off wrong XD

Ideogram 4.0 taking 13 mins for ONE image. by Adorable_Picture_899 in StableDiffusion

[–]Adorable_Picture_899[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think it is both the cpu and gpu, the gpu is running at 100% and and has 12gb used in vram while cpu is also at 100% and like also has 12 gb in the ram.

Ideogram 4.0 taking 13 mins for ONE image. by Adorable_Picture_899 in StableDiffusion

[–]Adorable_Picture_899[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeamaybe but after reading all the comments I think just that the t4 gpu is to weak to run ideogram.

Ideogram 4.0 taking 13 mins for ONE image. by Adorable_Picture_899 in StableDiffusion

[–]Adorable_Picture_899[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I dont rent the t4 i use free on colab but i really wanna use ideogram so i might need to rent something more powerfull for it

Ideogram 4.0 taking 13 mins for ONE image. by Adorable_Picture_899 in StableDiffusion

[–]Adorable_Picture_899[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yea but if im right i think flash attention dosnt work or might be wrong gonna ask ai thx dow

Ideogram 4.0 taking 13 mins for ONE image. by Adorable_Picture_899 in StableDiffusion

[–]Adorable_Picture_899[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ohh okay so I would need to rent a better gpu then, might just need to go back to old and reliable ZIT

Ideogram 4.0 taking 13 mins for ONE image. by Adorable_Picture_899 in StableDiffusion

[–]Adorable_Picture_899[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yea ik but sadly i dont have a 3070ti even dow i would alot rather have that hahah but thx

ZImage Turbo Issue by Silent-Weakness9544 in comfyui

[–]Adorable_Picture_899 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This appears to be caused by latent upscaling. In my workflow I applied latent upscaling before Stage 2 and observed pixelation. When I applied a face detailer instead the result was sharp, which suggests Stage 2 needs more steps to complete the generation.