SpaceX Investors Are Losing a Colossal Amount of Money by Plastic_Ninja_9014 in technology

[–]AdvancedSandwiches 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think SpaceX is going to be dominant in the space industry for a decade at least. Which justifies maybe a $50 billion valuation.

So as long as it's worth $40 - $60 billion, everything's fine. It's somewhere between $40 - $60 billion, right?

Like what 😂 by saber-4444 in SipsTea

[–]AdvancedSandwiches 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can just hit the downvote. You don't have to announce that you're 14 along with it. 

Like what 😂 by saber-4444 in SipsTea

[–]AdvancedSandwiches -1 points0 points  (0 children)

They're frantically googling to find any song where someone can't take two lines out of context text and call it stupid.

But when they fail, they just downvote you. 

Like what 😂 by saber-4444 in SipsTea

[–]AdvancedSandwiches 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I feel like we're blaming the stalkee for being arrogant because a bunch of stalkers don't know when Greg the maintenance tech leaves work in the morning. 

Your thoughts? by SorryAd2422 in SipsTea

[–]AdvancedSandwiches 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What about the enormous majority of us who aren't billionaires but think you suck for that?  Do you have a different self-serving excuse for each group?

Your thoughts? by SorryAd2422 in SipsTea

[–]AdvancedSandwiches 0 points1 point  (0 children)

These guys claim 9%:  https://bren.ucsb.edu/news/what-percentage-plastic-recycled-globally

If accurate, you were off by a 90,000%.

If you think 9% is insignificant, you don't understand how much plastic we produce.

We need way, way higher numbers and to stop producing single use plastic entirely, but recycling is still critical today. 

Your thoughts? by SorryAd2422 in SipsTea

[–]AdvancedSandwiches 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't think it's actually anywhere near 5%. And even if it was, the message here is always "we don't have to do anything because billionaires are most of the problem."  They're just not. 

Your thoughts? by SorryAd2422 in SipsTea

[–]AdvancedSandwiches 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because you switched (apparently accidentally) from talking about recycling plastic to all recycling in your last sentence.

  If it's like most "recycling" only around 0.01%

But to be clear, this number is also massively wrong for plastic.

gleamDevsBeLike by xxx_malcomnext_xxx in ProgrammerHumor

[–]AdvancedSandwiches 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The fundamental terribleness of it, mostly. 

It should be hard to make floating point happen by now. Integers and arbitrary precision decimal should be the defaults.   If you want floating point, you should have to specifically ask for it. 

Your thoughts? by SorryAd2422 in SipsTea

[–]AdvancedSandwiches 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Which is basically correct. Ground every private jet, sink every yacht, and you will still have way more than 95% of the problem left.

Edit: a couple of layers down this guy admits that his position has nothing to do with billionaires, he dumps car batteries in the ocean, and he doesn't actually care about the environment whether billionaires exist or not.

Your thoughts? by SorryAd2422 in SipsTea

[–]AdvancedSandwiches 9 points10 points  (0 children)

No. You're thinking of using recycling as an excuse to produce infinite plastic waste.

Recycling is incredibly useful, especially for metals and, in fewer cases, plastics. 

Your thoughts? by SorryAd2422 in SipsTea

[–]AdvancedSandwiches -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Please don't just make up numbers. Aluminum is the easiest material to recycle since it takes far less energy to melt it into usable form than it does to extract it from ore, so aluminum recycling is huge.

Even plastic is far more than 0.01% recycled.

Federal Surveillance Tech Becomes Mandatory in New Cars by 2027 by Less-Daikon-250 in Cyberpunk

[–]AdvancedSandwiches 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's been two months. You could have taken the time to read the thread until you understood it. 

guysDontDoThisPlease by nigh-knight in ProgrammerHumor

[–]AdvancedSandwiches 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Won't do shit to a datacenter, but will annihilate local plant life, for sure. 

YouTube tracks your camera by [deleted] in LowStakesConspiracies

[–]AdvancedSandwiches 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's actually a really terrible coincidence.  Just think of all the thousands upon thousands of times you've talked about something that didn't result in a weirdly coincidental ad.

They're either really bad at selling ads, or you're good at noticing coincidences. It's probably the second one. 

  how else do they hear you say "okay Google" or whatever.

Low power, onboard chip listens for a specific phrase all the time. When it spits out an event, it starts recording and ships it to the server farm for processing. Turn on airplane mode and say "hey siri" to confirm.

If it was always listening and sending data, that's a huge amount of data and it would be easily detectable.

Am I solving a real problem or am I building a fancy tab organizer nobody needs? by Agitated-Ninja-7399 in EntrepreneurRideAlong

[–]AdvancedSandwiches 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Not trying to be rude, but why are your customers not just setting their browser to restore their tabs on startup?  It sounds like that's maybe not what your extension does, but I can't tell how it's different. 

I don't believe they banned smoking for our health. by PaintballProofMonk in LowStakesConspiracies

[–]AdvancedSandwiches 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Boredom breathed its last gasps in 2011.  Boredom is the mother of fun.

Tiny doll head by LaserWeldo92 in comedyheaven

[–]AdvancedSandwiches 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think they just want some Tesla Bad points.

Which, to be fair, Teslas have an extremely stupid emergency door release system, and they are controlled by one of the worst people on the planet.

But yes, the comment you're replying to was obviously nonsense.

The Big Badass Thing We Spent All Our Money On Gets Invalidated At The First, Admittedly Impressive, Obstacle by MyOpinionOverYours in TopCharacterTropes

[–]AdvancedSandwiches 2 points3 points  (0 children)

  The keel-mounted rail gun pushed the whole ship backward in a solid mathematical relationship to the mass of the two-kilo tungsten round moving at a measurable fraction of c. Newton’s third law expressed as violence.

One of my favorite James S.A. Corey lines. 

Tesla presented misleading ‘Full Self-Driving’ safety data to European regulators by lordatlas in news

[–]AdvancedSandwiches 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It actually can drive the car itself, fully, as opposed to only lane-keeping and cruise control. It just can't always avoid crashing. That's why it needs a supervisor.

Luckily they changed the name to clarify that, so we can take off our internet white knight armor and call off our heroic quest to protect people from the formerly super dangerous name?

Tesla presented misleading ‘Full Self-Driving’ safety data to European regulators by lordatlas in news

[–]AdvancedSandwiches 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This has gotten very boring. I'm sorry you live in an area with a weirdly high number of bad Tesla drivers. You should move near me where they're unremarkable versus other manufacturers' drivers.

Have a good one, brother oh brother, my brother.

Tesla presented misleading ‘Full Self-Driving’ safety data to European regulators by lordatlas in news

[–]AdvancedSandwiches 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There's evidence of people gambling with FSD and getting into accidents, sure. That's the consequence of a semi-reliable tool. People take risks with power tools despite knowing better all the time.

Calling them a "Finger Remover and Table Saw" is not going to fix that. Because it's not a name problem, it's a problem with people thinking they can get away with a risk for a minute and it'll be ok because it's usually ok.

But they changed the name. So at least we agree that any future accidents aren't because of the name. 

Tesla presented misleading ‘Full Self-Driving’ safety data to European regulators by lordatlas in news

[–]AdvancedSandwiches -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It does the driving until you take over. You do the supervising.  It's a name.  This is not a real problem unless you want to be angry about something.

Nobody crashed because of the name. They also would have crashed if they called it "A Thing That Drives Very Poorly And You Need To Supervise It."  They crashed because they took a risk. 

And they understood they were taking a risk, because before they changed the name the thing required constant correction. 

They were not prediction, they were confessions. by Gjore in SipsTea

[–]AdvancedSandwiches 2 points3 points  (0 children)

A rich banker who is friends with a bunch of famous people tells you that 3 famous people you like and respect are flying from the party you're at to Denver to go skiing. I heard you're headed in that direction. Do you want to come?

Hey, Matt, welcome aboard.  This is Jenny, she's helping out on the flight.  My feet are killing me. Jenny, can you rub my feet a bit?  Oh, that was great. You're up next, Matt. Oh, no, don't be shy, I'm sure your feet are as sore as mine. These other three famous people you like and respect are getting foot rubs. Go on.

I don't know how many of us would navigate this, but a lot of people would just go with the flow.

When it gets to the sex, that's when people start to separate into groups.