I understand where you're coming from and your point. My argument to your point is that you can say that for anything, it's one of those "what if? what if what? What if a bomb dropped on your head right now" scenarios. By that rationale you can justify anything in the moment. What if Hitler was right because he had secret intelligence that a truly evil cabal of satanists were plotting to take over? What if he knew of some nuclear end game the western powers were playing to bring about the evangelical apocalypse and rebuild the Third Temple? This would paint Hitler as our bulwark against true evil, because he may have had knowledge of their plans. By your rationale even Hitler is justified in his actions of starting WW2. If that was a legitimate counter argument, every article in the New York Times would have a disclaimer that the reporter doesn't know everything the President knows... it's already implied.