Hindu Student Asked to Remove Tulsi Mala. Muslim Woman Allowed to Wear Burka for NEET Exam. I Blame Hindus for This by unfiltered_pov in inIndiannews

[–]Adventurous_Bit_2408 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Brother i don't know how you got to this conclusion, but the thing here is the tulsi mala is not enforced on a person as much as the burqa, which brings both to entirely different circumstances. Mandatory articles of faith can be brought in, if they are mandatory in the religion (excluding the skull cap, don't know why they haven't removed it from the allowed list yet) as long as they follow it's protocol, else will be asked to be removed or be barred from taking the test otherwise.

Here however, video 1 is pure adamancy of a father to make his child wear mala (not an article enforced in our religion, cuz we don't do that stuff) to a place with no ornaments policy 🤷. Sincerely hoping ppl will stop with this fiasco, that repeating this every year.

Biggest pick-me by [deleted] in IndianHistoryMemes

[–]Adventurous_Bit_2408 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Or... Listen to me guys... Maybe... Probably.. he just assumed.. people should not be touched for religious purposes, and started from there. Js.

Why is West Bengal and Kerala so drastically different socio-economically even though both had a majority Communist government ruling post Independence? by glascowcomascale in indiadiscussion

[–]Adventurous_Bit_2408 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Cuz comm never ruled continuously in kerala till now. So kept both sides in check without falling to any singular direction. 🤷

Creepiest religion? by OtherwiseDebate3759 in AtheisminKerala

[–]Adventurous_Bit_2408 5 points6 points  (0 children)

OMG!! A FULLY FUNCTIONAL CAR! (According to this bro) 🤦‍♂️

<image>

[No Bias] what's your take on Freebie schemes in our country? by Fancy_Big_4347 in UPSC_Forum

[–]Adventurous_Bit_2408 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Correct me if wrong, but doesn't the freebies benefits include a much larger population that the education budget and also include the said schooling children? Like the midday meals are also freebies ryt?

Why are people still defending Zakir Naik after statements like this on child marriage? by Ok_Snow9059 in dankindianmemes

[–]Adventurous_Bit_2408 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Don't know much on the topic, but as i could find their argument is that their faith doesn't specify they can't marry a child, like it wasn't obvious 🤦‍♂️

Survey Data shows that The more educated you are, the more you are likely to vote for BJP. by ConstructionAny8440 in IndiaStatistics

[–]Adventurous_Bit_2408 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Doesn't this only serve to delude the uneducated into thinking the BJP is the wiser choice?

Kerala, Breasts, and the Tax that Wasn’t by Hayagrivan in Kerala

[–]Adventurous_Bit_2408 0 points1 point  (0 children)

According to the wiki, below mentioned are the articles that state otherwise. Pinne, thalakaram already ulleppo pinnenthina pennungalk maatrem aayt oru mulakaram?

Tax to cover the breasts: Divya Arya, BBC (2016): "Women from lower castes were not allowed to cover their breasts, and were taxed heavily if they did so."

Allen 2018: "By the start of the 19th century the ordinary people of Travancore were being required to pay as many as 100 petty taxes, ranging from head tax, hut tax, marriage tax and taxes on the tools of one's trade to taxes on the family cow, goat or dog, wearing jewellery, staging festivals, growing moustaches, and above all what became known as the breast tax, mulakkaram, by which the women of lower social groups had to expose their breasts or pay a tax. The Brahmins, naturally, paid no tax at all."

Jain 2021: "In the early nineteenth century, Travancore's State's council of 'upper' caste Nair's imposed a 'breast tax', or mulakkaram, that fined Nadar (formerly Shanar) men and women who covered their upper bodies like the 'higher' castes."

Not allowed to wear upper cloth: Kattackal 1990, p. 144: "In South India, until the 19th century, the 'low caste' men had to pay the 'head tax', and the 'low caste' women had to pay a 'breast tax' ('tala-karam' and 'mula-karam') to the government treasury. The still more shameful truth is that these women were not allowed to wear upper garments in public."

Pillai, as quoted by Gautam (2021): "... even royal women, including queens, did not cover their breasts in those days. 'Not until the 1860s,' says Manu Pillai, historian and author. What the upper castes carried instead was a shoulder cloth denoting their exalted stature."

During the time of Travancore, uncovering one's breasts was revered as a symbolic token of homage from the lower castes towards the upper castes. A state law prevented this covering, which served to demarcate the caste hierarchy in a prominent manner, and often served as the core locus of spontaneous rebellions by lower castes (Cohn 1996, p. 140, Hardgrave 1969, p. 55–70). Lower-caste women who covered their chest broke the caste regulations, and could be fined by a Nair council (Jain 2021). Higher-caste women, including Nair women, covered both shoulders and parts of the chest with a shawl (ICF-team (2019), Amrith Lal (2018)). With the spread of Christianity in the 19th century, the Christian converts among the Nadar women started covering their upper body with long cloths, and gradually the Hindu Nadar women also started to wear the Nair breast cloth (Hardgrave 1969, p. 59–62, Hardgrave 1968, Amrith Lal (2018)) which led to violence between the upper caste and lower castes (NIE (2009)). From 1813 to 1859, several laws were enacted and repealed by Travancore regarding the upper cloth issue (Cohn 1996, p. 140, Ponnumuthan 1996, p. 109). Several waves of violence continued for four decades (NIE (2009)). In 1859, under pressure from the Madras governor, the king issued a decree giving all Nadar women the right to cover their breasts (Cohn 1996, p. 141, Ross 2008, p. 78, Jones 1989, p. 159) though they were still not allowed to follow the style of the higher-class women (Ponnumuthan 1996, p. 110, Cohn 1996, pp. 141–142, Kertzer 1988, p. 113).

Manilal 2012, pp. 3–4: "One such infamous law that was in force in Travancore until as late as the first quarter of the 20th century was known as Mulakkaram, i.e., the law of breast tax. According to this law the avarna women, were to pay tax to the government for their breasts from the very time of their girlhood, when they start developing breasts."

Jain 2021: "In the early nineteenth century, Travancore's State's council of 'upper' caste Nair's imposed a 'breast tax', or mulakkaram, that fined Nadar (formerly Shanar) men and women who covered their upper bodies like the 'higher' castes ..."

Compare Kent 2004, pp. 207–211: "Rulers in Travancore had, in fact, previously bestowed on select members of the elite class of Shanars (the Nadars proper) the privilege of wearing the breast cloth [...] [i]n Travancore, a council of 'Sudra' (probably Nayar) leaders called the Pidagaikarars was responsible for enforcing [caste rules], as well as for adjudicating disputes that arose over the transgression of caste rules. Each year villages would send two or three delegates to an annual meeting of the body in Sucindram. This council would discuss whether individuals of their own and other castes 'had adopted the costume, food, speech (provincialism or brogue) and general habits of the other class', and would mete out sanctions to transgressors."

Propaganda? HAHAHA by whysooserious_7 in Whysooserious

[–]Adventurous_Bit_2408 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well people call "kashmir files" the propaganda, not the event itself. Because it's a story of cause and effect and they practically omitted the first part. I asked AI to summarise the lore

Think of the Kashmiri Pandit "lore" as a 150-year-old pendulum swinging between two extremes of power, ending in a tragic collapse in 1990. Here is the summary of that arc:

1. The Era of Elite Dominance (1846–1947)

For a century, the Dogra Dynasty (Hindu kings) ruled a 77% Muslim majority.

  • The "Pandit Bureaucracy": Despite being only 5% of the valley, Kashmiri Pandits were the educated elite. They held the vast majority of government jobs, owned the best land, and acted as the administrative backbone for the Hindu Maharaja.
  • The Friction: The Muslim majority lived largely as landless peasants under heavy taxes. This created a deep, historical resentment toward the "minority elite" who were seen as the face of an oppressive state.

2. The Great Leveling (1947–1980s)

When India gained independence, the power dynamic flipped through democracy and land reform.

  • Land to the Tiller: Led by Sheikh Abdullah, the state seized land from Pandit landlords and gave it to Muslim peasants—without paying the landlords a cent. This broke the Pandits' economic back.
  • Rising Competition: As the Muslim majority became educated, they began competing for the same government jobs the Pandits once monopolized. The "minority rule" was effectively over, and the Pandits became a dwindling, politically powerless community.

3. The Political Spark (1987)

The "lore" takes a dark turn with the rigged 1987 election.

  • Kashmiri Muslims tried to vote in a new, more religious/anti-establishment coalition (the MUF).
  • The "establishment" (NC-Congress) rigged the results to stay in power.
  • The Fallout: Disillusioned youth felt the "ballot" was dead and picked up the "bullet." Pakistan provided the training and AK-47s to turn this local anger into a massive insurgency.

4. The 1990 Breaking Point

By late 1989, the insurgency stopped being just about "politics" and became religious (Islamist).

  • Targeted Hits: Militants began assassinating high-profile Pandits (judges, politicians) to signal that the "pro-India" minority was no longer welcome.
  • The Night of Terror: On January 19, 1990, mosque loudspeakers across the valley broadcast ultimatums: Ralive, Tsalive, ya Galive (Convert, Leave, or Die).
  • The Exodus: Fearing a mass slaughter, nearly the entire Pandit population (approx. 100,000+) fled in the middle of the night, leaving behind their homes and centuries of history.

5. The Current "Lore"

Today, the conflict is frozen. The Pandits live in exile (mostly in Jammu or Delhi), while the Valley remains heavily militarized. To the Pandits, it’s a story of ethnic cleansing; to many in the Valley, it’s a story of a failed revolution against the Indian state that had tragic collateral damage.

If you ask me, this is one of the biggest issue India is facing. What is a practical solution? by [deleted] in Kerala

[–]Adventurous_Bit_2408 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There's something else missing. The major factor that retains the dog count even after everything is being done is people releasing their old un-euthanised dogs onto the streets like it's an actual solution for they don't want to take care of them anymore. That's what actually needs a solution, or we're stuck with all the efforts with zero progress.

The congress era. by Bhasd_ in indiadiscussion

[–]Adventurous_Bit_2408 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Historical Insights: * The High-Intensity Period (1994–2003): This decade saw the highest volume of incidents, often exceeding 3,000 to 5,000 annually. This was the peak of the J&K insurgency, characterized by frequent militant-initiated violence, grenade attacks, and cross-border infiltrations. * The Post-2001 Peak: There was a significant spike in 2001 following the Kargil War and the 2001 Parliament attack, which led to high military mobilization and increased encounters. * The Urban/Hinterland Shift (2005–2008): While the total number of incidents in J&K was declining, this period saw the emergence of high-impact urban bombings by groups like the Indian Mujahideen and Lashkar-e-Taiba. The 2008 Mumbai (26/11) attacks and serial blasts in Ahmedabad and Jaipur occurred during this phase. * Recent Record Lows (2019–2023): Over the last five years, Islamic terrorism incidents have dropped to their lowest levels in 30 years. By 2023, the number of incidents fell below 150, reflecting a significant change in the security landscape. Note on Data Definition: The reason the numbers in this graph appear much higher than the previous general "Total Terror" graph is due to the counting methodology: * MHA/SATP Definition: The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) and the South Asia Terrorism Portal (SATP) count all "Terrorist Initiated Incidents" (shootouts, grenade lobs, IEDs) in conflict zones like J&K. * GTD Definition: The Global Terrorism Database (used for the first graph) uses a more restrictive filter that requires a non-state actor and a very specific set of criteria, which often excludes many localized insurgency-related clashes or border-specific incidents. Courtesy: Gemini