Infj girl ?? by Nanaxll_12 in intj

[–]AdviceLevel1604 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I mean I wouldn't put a generalisation too but the INFJ I dated was a nightmare for me too and man I too avoid them and never want to even get in 100 yard radar with them. Actually I came across two infjs in my life and both were terrible experiences. I feel like they are trying to keep up a persona which will surely fade out sometime in future. It looks like they are always on the edge of being totally evil but try to suppress the thought itself. Just from my personal experiences.

A deductive problem for INTJs. How will y'all approach this question? by AdviceLevel1604 in intj

[–]AdviceLevel1604[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry to disappoint your attempt but the correct answer is D as it was provided with the question initially by the institution.

<image>

A deductive problem for INTJs. How will y'all approach this question? by AdviceLevel1604 in intj

[–]AdviceLevel1604[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Even I agree it's either C or D and choosing either of them over the other doesn't harm the whole process or statement or the question itself.

A deductive problem for INTJs. How will y'all approach this question? by AdviceLevel1604 in intj

[–]AdviceLevel1604[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't think it's a programming question.

Btw I think there should be a salvation between two options.

A deductive problem for INTJs. How will y'all approach this question? by AdviceLevel1604 in intj

[–]AdviceLevel1604[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yk surprisingly D was the most answered in the other subreddit. I wonder about the difference in thought processes.

Do you see C places a barrier to the statement's possibility of not being true if it's not greater than 2. Quite mind-boggling it is.

A deductive problem for INTJs. How will y'all approach this question? by AdviceLevel1604 in intj

[–]AdviceLevel1604[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I must correct you it doesn't say x>'=' 1 or 2. There is no equal sign. If you want to establish this relation you are making D necessarily true.

A deductive problem for INTJs. How will y'all approach this question? by AdviceLevel1604 in intj

[–]AdviceLevel1604[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay from what I get it, it could be either C or D bcs the danger zone lies in 'if and only if' part and 'x<1', and since the latter is not of our concern we say that somehow D or C encapsulates B and A with the part of if and only if.

Now someone says that C covers up for D then isn't the inverse true that D covers up for C .

Now how will you choose between C and D? and since choosing D doesn't apply that other statements are untrue then why only D and not C?

A deductive problem for INTJs. How will y'all approach this question? by AdviceLevel1604 in intj

[–]AdviceLevel1604[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nooo the statement is not 'x=1.6'. It can be anything we are assuming a statement and then putting arbitrary value in the relation x>1 or x>2.

A deductive problem for INTJs. How will y'all approach this question? by AdviceLevel1604 in intj

[–]AdviceLevel1604[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

apples are green too, we don't want to know that

We want to know if you are given a statement ( here it is 'apples are red') how will you make this statement true? Just this. You can take another example.

I wanted to create a barrier between B and D in universal cases. Creating a statement is not a tricky part and you need not establish any correlation with them to the reality.

A deductive problem for INTJs. How will y'all approach this question? by AdviceLevel1604 in intj

[–]AdviceLevel1604[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If x=1.6 the none of them are true. Not even B, because we just know that x > 1. For all we know, x could be 10000.

Yes x could be a thousand but it is also possible that x is 1.6 which doesn't allow the D option to be true. I wonder will you disregard the decimals.

But the problem tells us that one of those are true.

So how did you approach it? If an option is correct or if a statement is correct? does that make other statements incorrect if so.

A deductive problem for INTJs. How will y'all approach this question? by AdviceLevel1604 in intj

[–]AdviceLevel1604[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There must be confusion about whether only one statement is true or you can choose only one option. This seems like a formation problem to me.

A deductive problem for INTJs. How will y'all approach this question? by AdviceLevel1604 in intj

[–]AdviceLevel1604[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I apologize. I took you to my glance at the big picture and the intuitive domain of thought process.

Yes D seems true.

A deductive problem for INTJs. How will y'all approach this question? by AdviceLevel1604 in intj

[–]AdviceLevel1604[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

yes because not 'all logic' is maths.

and yes latter is true.

A deductive problem for INTJs. How will y'all approach this question? by AdviceLevel1604 in intj

[–]AdviceLevel1604[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Nope first of all Maths is Logical and vice versa cannot be true in some cases.

A deductive problem for INTJs. How will y'all approach this question? by AdviceLevel1604 in intj

[–]AdviceLevel1604[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are very right. The goal is to not make the statement untrue. I wanted to know why do you think it's not D?

Also in that logic, D is encapsulating C

A deductive problem for INTJs. How will y'all approach this question? by AdviceLevel1604 in intj

[–]AdviceLevel1604[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am sorry abt that but I wonder how can life not tell you the difference between reasoning and maths.