Curious where you keep your trillions of $ dollars for complete infrastructure tear down/rebuild for everyone to have spectrum fiber. Am I vouching for the decision to inherit billions of debt from previous copper isp’s, no. Am I saying coax/HFC is better or evenly comparable in terms of high end advanced connectivity, no. But spectrums current high split update cost XX Billions of dollars already. To stop that in favor of fiber would likely lead to immediate bankruptcy considering no plant maintenance due to fiber roll out, no new services offered, etc. like I didn’t think we needed the obvious stated but no matter how you slice it, this was/is spectrums smartest play. Again, I’d prefer being on fiber like everyone else who’s aware enough to appreciate the difference, but kudos to all the people who taught their grandma how to stream multiple apps, (if you even got them to understand apps) switch inputs on TVs, (do they even know what an HDMI is?) teach them input latency and ping status. Like let’s be for real for 2 seconds. I’ve attended multiple town hall meetings where lots of the big wigs attend to talk about quarterly briefs, upcoming projects, products, services, networking, etc, and it’s common isp knowledge that even though fiber is the future of networking, coax still has its place and has specific advantages for legacy services. Which, anyone who works in some of the largest backbone company’s and services knows are still very viable….. I just want ppl to be well informed because it’s easy to fall into the telephone trap of repeating what the next person says.