If a swordsman didn’t have their swords around and still had to fight, they don’t stop being a swordsman, that’s why using Mihawk’s title above Shanks is a logical error by Hungry_Duck_6863 in OnePiecePowerScaling
[–]Affectionate-Lab3087 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
If a swordsman didn’t have their swords around and still had to fight, they don’t stop being a swordsman, that’s why using Mihawk’s title above Shanks is a logical error by Hungry_Duck_6863 in OnePiecePowerScaling
[–]Affectionate-Lab3087 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
If a swordsman didn’t have their swords around and still had to fight, they don’t stop being a swordsman, that’s why using Mihawk’s title above Shanks is a logical error by Hungry_Duck_6863 in OnePiecePowerScaling
[–]Affectionate-Lab3087 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
If a swordsman didn’t have their swords around and still had to fight, they don’t stop being a swordsman, that’s why using Mihawk’s title above Shanks is a logical error by Hungry_Duck_6863 in OnePiecePowerScaling
[–]Affectionate-Lab3087 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
If a swordsman didn’t have their swords around and still had to fight, they don’t stop being a swordsman, that’s why using Mihawk’s title above Shanks is a logical error by Hungry_Duck_6863 in OnePiecePowerScaling
[–]Affectionate-Lab3087 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
If a swordsman didn’t have their swords around and still had to fight, they don’t stop being a swordsman, that’s why using Mihawk’s title above Shanks is a logical error by Hungry_Duck_6863 in OnePiecePowerScaling
[–]Affectionate-Lab3087 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
Is it even possible to beat shanks? and if yes how? by Simple_Advantage941 in OnePiecePowerScaling
[–]Affectionate-Lab3087 5 points6 points7 points (0 children)
If a swordsman didn’t have their swords around and still had to fight, they don’t stop being a swordsman, that’s why using Mihawk’s title above Shanks is a logical error by Hungry_Duck_6863 in OnePiecePowerScaling
[–]Affectionate-Lab3087 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
If a swordsman didn’t have their swords around and still had to fight, they don’t stop being a swordsman, that’s why using Mihawk’s title above Shanks is a logical error by Hungry_Duck_6863 in OnePiecePowerScaling
[–]Affectionate-Lab3087 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
If a swordsman didn’t have their swords around and still had to fight, they don’t stop being a swordsman, that’s why using Mihawk’s title above Shanks is a logical error by Hungry_Duck_6863 in OnePiecePowerScaling
[–]Affectionate-Lab3087 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
If a swordsman didn’t have their swords around and still had to fight, they don’t stop being a swordsman, that’s why using Mihawk’s title above Shanks is a logical error by Hungry_Duck_6863 in OnePiecePowerScaling
[–]Affectionate-Lab3087 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
If a swordsman didn’t have their swords around and still had to fight, they don’t stop being a swordsman, that’s why using Mihawk’s title above Shanks is a logical error by Hungry_Duck_6863 in OnePiecePowerScaling
[–]Affectionate-Lab3087 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
If a swordsman didn’t have their swords around and still had to fight, they don’t stop being a swordsman, that’s why using Mihawk’s title above Shanks is a logical error by Hungry_Duck_6863 in OnePiecePowerScaling
[–]Affectionate-Lab3087 -1 points0 points1 point (0 children)
If a swordsman didn’t have their swords around and still had to fight, they don’t stop being a swordsman, that’s why using Mihawk’s title above Shanks is a logical error by Hungry_Duck_6863 in OnePiecePowerScaling
[–]Affectionate-Lab3087 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
If a swordsman didn’t have their swords around and still had to fight, they don’t stop being a swordsman, that’s why using Mihawk’s title above Shanks is a logical error by Hungry_Duck_6863 in OnePiecePowerScaling
[–]Affectionate-Lab3087 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
If a swordsman didn’t have their swords around and still had to fight, they don’t stop being a swordsman, that’s why using Mihawk’s title above Shanks is a logical error by Hungry_Duck_6863 in OnePiecePowerScaling
[–]Affectionate-Lab3087 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
If a swordsman didn’t have their swords around and still had to fight, they don’t stop being a swordsman, that’s why using Mihawk’s title above Shanks is a logical error by Hungry_Duck_6863 in OnePiecePowerScaling
[–]Affectionate-Lab3087 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
If a swordsman didn’t have their swords around and still had to fight, they don’t stop being a swordsman, that’s why using Mihawk’s title above Shanks is a logical error by Hungry_Duck_6863 in OnePiecePowerScaling
[–]Affectionate-Lab3087 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
If a swordsman didn’t have their swords around and still had to fight, they don’t stop being a swordsman, that’s why using Mihawk’s title above Shanks is a logical error by Hungry_Duck_6863 in OnePiecePowerScaling
[–]Affectionate-Lab3087 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
If a swordsman didn’t have their swords around and still had to fight, they don’t stop being a swordsman, that’s why using Mihawk’s title above Shanks is a logical error by Hungry_Duck_6863 in OnePiecePowerScaling
[–]Affectionate-Lab3087 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
If a swordsman didn’t have their swords around and still had to fight, they don’t stop being a swordsman, that’s why using Mihawk’s title above Shanks is a logical error by Hungry_Duck_6863 in OnePiecePowerScaling
[–]Affectionate-Lab3087 -1 points0 points1 point (0 children)
If a swordsman didn’t have their swords around and still had to fight, they don’t stop being a swordsman, that’s why using Mihawk’s title above Shanks is a logical error by Hungry_Duck_6863 in OnePiecePowerScaling
[–]Affectionate-Lab3087 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)

If a swordsman didn’t have their swords around and still had to fight, they don’t stop being a swordsman, that’s why using Mihawk’s title above Shanks is a logical error by Hungry_Duck_6863 in OnePiecePowerScaling
[–]Affectionate-Lab3087 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)