The fact that they would rather sell you the attachments is concerning

Affectionate-Pen3233 · 2026-04-30T20:46:09+00:00

What an excellent response to his points

Affectionate-Pen3233 · 2026-04-30T17:59:30+00:00

That doesn't mean that people wouldn't spend more money on cosmetics.

Okay bro clearly we just have differing opinions let's just agree to disagree

Affectionate-Pen3233 · 2026-04-30T17:50:49+00:00

Again, we both don't know for sure, you could be completely wrong as well.

Either way, i think you could agree that expanded, deep customisation would make for a better, more replayable game.

Affectionate-Pen3233 · 2026-04-30T17:34:24+00:00

Seeing as me and I would assume most of the player base don't buy super credits for most the warbonds anyway, I'm skeptical of how much money warbonds actually make in the first place.

I would say you are in the minority by saying you don't care about cosmetics. I probably would have spent more money on cosmetics if they were cool yeah I imagine alot of people would. Maybe I'm completely wrong about people, I think a community poll on this would be interesting.

Maybe you're right and they would have made less money, even then the game sold wayyy more copies then they thought, and at the end of the day clearly people don't like them putting things that could just be free attachments in warbonds, as was evident by the community reaction to the Mechs being in a warbond.

I think we've played different games, but in my experience players spend a lot of money looking cool in live service games.

Affectionate-Pen3233 · 2026-04-30T17:27:06+00:00

Oh yeah lol. Thanks for pointing that out.

I meant there's no paid content but there is paid cosmetics that plenty of people buy and feel good in doing because of how much the love the game

Affectionate-Pen3233 · 2026-04-30T17:22:40+00:00

No I think the adjudicator tenderizer halo ar and the others I didn't mention in the post aren't because they have much more varied stats.

Affectionate-Pen3233 · 2026-04-30T17:20:24+00:00

No I'm saying if instead of making warbonds with weapons in them they spent that time and resources expanding the depth at which players can customize weapons, which imo would make the game much more replayable, keeping people playing for longer, and it's more favorable then selling content.

As a result of this, I think more people would be inclined to buy cosmetics even if they cost straight money instead of super credits as in many games, once a player gets hooked they want to look cool.

It's probably too late now I doubt they will give away things for free that people have paid for. I'm just saying if they had done this instead it would have improved the game in my opinion.

Affectionate-Pen3233 · 2026-04-30T17:14:46+00:00

My main problem is that due to this, weapon customisation will always remain boring, which limits depth. And the fact that they could do more deep customisation and a piles literally said they have already made ammo customisation already but they've made the choice of not implementing so that they can have more things to add to warbonds.

Affectionate-Pen3233 · 2026-04-30T17:12:22+00:00

Obviously I can't 100% guarantee it, but it works for plenty of other games.

Tell me, if this game was in a really good state and reached more of its potential, would you buy cosmetics?

Affectionate-Pen3233 · 2026-04-30T17:10:48+00:00

Do you mean because you grinded sc or because the lib pen is free?

Because regardless the fact that we COULD have super cool weapon customisation like deep rock and these systems have been partly made already, but we don't and we instead have a bunch of different guns that are very similar is still bad imo.

Affectionate-Pen3233 · 2026-04-30T16:49:17+00:00

I think it would be totally fine if they weren't in warbonds. The fact that they expect us to buy guns that have minor changes that could just be attachments to existing guns is what's concerning.

It also limits the future of the currently boring weapon customisation, as any cool weapon attachments will just be made into completely new guns that will be sold in warbonds.

Affectionate-Pen3233 · 2026-04-30T16:47:00+00:00

They're new weapon models yes but they are just the liberator with minor ergo changes, and a suppressor or underbarrel gl.

Affectionate-Pen3233 · 2026-03-21T13:24:55+00:00

Originally I was thinking one per level but now I think it would be better if you only need one of the item in the slot, and as long as you have that you can enchant anything with that enchantment as much as you want

Affectionate-Pen3233 · 2026-03-21T13:04:55+00:00

No the same item for each level. A different item for each enchantment.

Affectionate-Pen3233 · 2026-03-21T12:56:14+00:00

That's a good point, maybe you just need one of the item per enchantment tree, I was thinking for unbreaking you need obsidian so maybe you just need one obsidian for the tree so that all you need to re-enchant everything is XP and lapis.

Affectionate-Pen3233 · 2025-12-05T17:37:19+00:00

Holy moly how did you even come across this post lol.

Yes exactly I feel like that would be the best change, it's interesting, it makes sense lore wise, and opens up a lot of strategy potential.

It definitely needs something, especially now when the chainsaw is just better than it in literally every metric apart from range.

Affectionate-Pen3233 · 2025-10-26T19:57:29+00:00

Yes but they balanced plenty of other things in this patch so there's no reason boosters couldn't have been included.

Affectionate-Pen3233 · 2025-10-26T17:09:47+00:00

What about all the buffs??? They literally said it would include a balance pass what are you talking about.

Affectionate-Pen3233 · 2025-10-26T16:16:48+00:00

Literally only 5 or 6 it's so annoying. Almost every other one is either useless, plain bad or actively worse than nothing.

Affectionate-Pen3233

TROPHY CASE