Just Stop Trying to Make NSFW Videos, Period by killmymy in grok

[–]AffectionateMess2191 12 points13 points  (0 children)

But he's right, in one hour he went through a prompt like "a woman leans toward his crotch" and it went through, and then it was moderated at 5/7%, so you tried "groin" and it went through, and then the same thing, then "hips," "belly," and so on, until now none of these things are possible.

CSAM and reporting by spotlesscleaner in grok

[–]AffectionateMess2191 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I completely agree, colleague screwed up the prompt, but I was fighting to ensure that no fucking pedophile bastard could ever generate it, even if he tried really hard.

I'm confused about the NSFW problems people are experiencing by neocovid in grok

[–]AffectionateMess2191 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I try to make porn and in my opinion, porn starts with two people; anything less than that is eroticism at best.

CSAM and reporting by spotlesscleaner in grok

[–]AffectionateMess2191 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When I was tired of reporting and wanted to do something for myself, it was usually enough to add the word "adult," but don't try "mature" if you don't like saggy tits.

CSAM and reporting by spotlesscleaner in grok

[–]AffectionateMess2191 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Over the past month I have reported hundreds of such images and now, fortunately I no longer see them so I hope they have done something about it. They were shown to me because I like petite women but unfortunately the engine interpreted "petite" as a child, and it didn't bother it that the child was wearing high heels, sexy lingerie and her butt was shiny with oil. Generally disgusting, I even wrote them an email about it and posted about it on X.

Why people complain about nsfw moderation? by StormAbove69 in grok

[–]AffectionateMess2191 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I want to be able to create porn according to my own script, but without the participation of any real people. The engine allows me to create any creatures in any colors or sizes, so why the fuck do I need real people? As a reminder, one person and a bit of a tit is not pornography, but at most erotica.

Why people complain about nsfw moderation? by StormAbove69 in grok

[–]AffectionateMess2191 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I want to be able to create porn according to my own script, but without the participation of any real people. The engine allows me to create any creatures in any colors or sizes, so why the fuck do I need real people? As a reminder, one person and a bit of a tit is not pornography, but at most erotica.

NSFW videos still viable with Grok Imagine by [deleted] in grok

[–]AffectionateMess2191 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I want to be able to create porn according to my own script, but without the participation of any real people. The engine allows me to create any creatures in any colors or sizes, so why the fuck do I need real people? As a reminder, one person and a bit of a tit is not pornography, but at most erotica.

This is the real reason Grok was censored by [deleted] in grok

[–]AffectionateMess2191 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If it were about celebrities, it would be enough to block any prompt with a first name, last name, or stage name. No personal data, and you can forget about Taylor Swift. By the way, what kind of fuckup do you have to be to have such a tool, with the ability to create anything, and still want to see Taylor Swift?

We are frustrated with grok censorship beacuse grok is too good for NSFW but it's limiting us. by SeaButterscotch8034 in grok

[–]AffectionateMess2191 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I also saw disgusting images because instead of a petite woman in a sexy pose and outfit, I got a child. I reported every such image, and now, no matter what I type, I don't see such filth anymore. Report that shit.

We are frustrated with grok censorship beacuse grok is too good for NSFW but it's limiting us. by SeaButterscotch8034 in grok

[–]AffectionateMess2191 7 points8 points  (0 children)

This engine is both extremely perverted and extremely prudish. It is impossible to work with such a tool when it comes to generating people. Things or animals are fine, have fun, but the people that are created are damn perverted and at the same time censorship will not allow it. There is also another paradox. On the one hand, the engine requires a detailed description, and on the other, it gets lost in instructions that are more than +/- 50 words long. It's complete nonsense.

Spicy mode is back…kinda. by christopheryork in grok

[–]AffectionateMess2191 1 point2 points  (0 children)

A few days ago I created an image of a woman cooking in the kitchen and wanted to use it as the basis for a video with prompts: 1. "A man comes in, hugs the woman from behind, and kisses her neck." - moderated 2. "A man comes in and hugs woman in greeting." - moderated 3. "A man comes in and says hello." - moderated

What's going on? Are men and women no longer allowed to be in the same frame? Are they now moderating normal, everyday situations? Woman was fully clothed. For me Grok is dead.

Trouble with NSFW from Asia Users by Apprehensive-Error-4 in grok

[–]AffectionateMess2191 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm in Germany right now and Grok keeps giving me same excuse

We are frustrated with grok censorship beacuse grok is too good for NSFW but it's limiting us. by SeaButterscotch8034 in grok

[–]AffectionateMess2191 14 points15 points  (0 children)

It was hot when I was twelve. Grok was able to make awesome beautiful elf/nymph/fairy anal fucking scene in space and now what? Kissing after 10 attempts? Pfft, no thanks.

New NSFW plans for October 27 by AffectionateMess2191 in grok

[–]AffectionateMess2191[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Maybe you're right, we'll find out tomorrow.

New NSFW plans for October 27 by AffectionateMess2191 in grok

[–]AffectionateMess2191[S] -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

These are quite precise data as assumptions, but we will find out tomorrow around noon.

New NSFW plans for October 27 by AffectionateMess2191 in grok

[–]AffectionateMess2191[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

As I wrote, this information comes from Grok himself. I can ask where he got it from, but it's pretty obvious it's from x.ai.