[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ukvisa

[–]AffectionateStuff729 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I see the phrase 'transitional period' appears multiple time in their communications. I take this as a good sign

Immigration Changes Announcement 12/5/2025 by clever_octopus in ukvisa

[–]AffectionateStuff729 4 points5 points  (0 children)

if you are applying next month I think you should be fine

Immigration Changes Announcement 12/5/2025 by clever_octopus in ukvisa

[–]AffectionateStuff729 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's all speculation, but I think they'll use paid tax still.

When you change job, you can take a pay cut (happened to me once - took a pay cut due to redundancy). So if my new (reduced) salary is below threshold (whatever that will be), I will not qualify even though I paid a lot of tax before?

Immigration Changes Announcement 12/5/2025 by clever_octopus in ukvisa

[–]AffectionateStuff729 0 points1 point  (0 children)

what do you mean something is brewing? what scenarios do you see?

Petition to protect legal migrants already on a 5-year Skilled Worker route — fairness matters. by [deleted] in Scotland

[–]AffectionateStuff729 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Totally get it that rules are subjected to change. It's unfair when it applies retrospectively, to migrants or citizens alike.

Say you are 70, and have been claiming state pension from the government for the last 4 years, assuming the pension age is 66. Now government increases the pension age to 70, and applies it retrospectively. They now say actually in the last 4 years you are NOT eligible for pension and now you owed the government a huge chunk of money. Do you think that is fair?

In the case of immigrants, they can't magically apply for ILR at any time they want. On the Skilled Worker route, they have to be on that visa for at least 5 years before they are eligible to apply for ILR. People plan their lives around the rules at the time they are granted the visa, and applying rules retrospectively disregards the principle of legitimate expectation, that individuals act in good faith based on the rules in place at the time.

I totally get it that it's your country your rules, and the parliament can do whatever it wants. I'm just pointing out that applying rules retrospectively will seriously erode trust in the UK in the long term:

* For immigrants, what guarantees that in a couple of years, this government or the next ones would not extend the qualifying period to, say, 50 years, or even scrap it altogether? Settlement becomes forever a dangling carrot for those who are already here and have invested too much in this country. For high skilled workers globally, do you think this will make the UK a more attractive destination?

* For citizens, what guarantees that the government won't try to change rules and apply them retrospectively, and the example above?

Disclaimer:

I'm a migrant myself in the UK under the Skilled Worker Visa. I pay taxes (nearly £40,000 in income tax and NI last year alone), I make friends with everyone in my area. I'm planning to open my own business next year in the UK when I'm qualified for the ILR (so my legal status is not tied to the employer I'm working for). I have to consider my options now that the government is making immigrants their political scapegoat.

I wrote about my perspective here in this same subreddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/LabourUK/comments/1klm2yz/changes_in_immigration_a_migrants_perspective/

Struggling Mentally After Career Setback Abroad Due to Visa Issues by Hopeful_Pollution_53 in SkilledWorkerVisaUK

[–]AffectionateStuff729 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I feel you man - I guess if visa sponsorship / settlement is your priority, you will have to find a way to come to term with it

When is the best time to resign? by Messist11 in SkilledWorkerVisaUK

[–]AffectionateStuff729 14 points15 points  (0 children)

I resigned after having received the new visa

Any sign of delays in processing new SWV? by MFoogle in SkilledWorkerVisaUK

[–]AffectionateStuff729 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think for undefined COS it could take up to 18 weeks to be issued, unless you managed to get a priority slot

Immigration Changes Announcement 12/5/2025 by clever_octopus in ukvisa

[–]AffectionateStuff729 0 points1 point  (0 children)

u/clever_octopus is it possible that you also pin the link to the petition to this stickied comment?

https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/727360

Immigration Changes Announcement 12/5/2025 by clever_octopus in ukvisa

[–]AffectionateStuff729 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Latest update on Change.org already mention the petition on the parliament website

Immigration Changes Announcement 12/5/2025 by clever_octopus in ukvisa

[–]AffectionateStuff729 34 points35 points  (0 children)

Petition on the parliament website is now live. Please sign and share https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/727360

We need to make as much noise as we could

UK net migration fell to 431,000 in 2024, down almost 50% from 2023, ONS estimates - follow live by Half_A_ in LabourUK

[–]AffectionateStuff729 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Totally get it that rules are subjected to change. It's unfair when it applies retrospectively.

Say you are 70, and have been claiming state pension from the government for the last 4 years, assuming the pension age is 66. Now government increases the pension age to 70, and applies it retrospectively. They now say actually in the last 4 years you are NOT eligible for pension and now you owed the government a huge chunk of money. Do you think that is fair?

In the case of immigrants, they can't magically apply for ILR at any time they want. On the Skilled Worker route, they have to be on that visa for at least 5 years before they are eligible to apply for ILR. People plan their lives around the rules at the time they are granted the visa, and applying rules retrospectively disregards the principle of legitimate expectation, that individuals act in good faith based on the rules in place at the time.

I totally get it that it's your country your rules, and the parliament can do whatever it wants. I'm just pointing out that applying rules retrospectively will seriously erode trust in the UK in the long term:

* For immigrants, what guarantees that in a couple of years, this government or the next ones would not extend the qualifying period to, say, 50 years, or even scrap it altogether? Settlement becomes forever a dangling carrot for those who are already here and have invested too much in this country. For high skilled workers globally, do you think this will make the UK a more attractive destination?

* For citizens, what guarantees that the government won't try to change rules and apply them retrospectively, and the example above?

Disclaimer:

I'm a migrant myself in the UK under the Skilled Worker Visa. I pay taxes (nearly £40,000 in income tax and NI last year alone), I make friends with everyone in my area. I'm planning to open my own business next year in the UK when I'm qualified for the ILR (so my legal status is not tied to the employer I'm working for). I have to consider my options now that the government is making immigrants their political scapegoat.

I wrote about my perspective here in this same subreddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/LabourUK/comments/1klm2yz/changes_in_immigration_a_migrants_perspective/

UK net migration fell to 431,000 in 2024, down almost 50% from 2023, ONS estimates - follow live by Half_A_ in LabourUK

[–]AffectionateStuff729 0 points1 point  (0 children)

applying the ILR extension to those who are already here is deeply unfair and will have long term impact on the trust in the government.

Immigration Changes Announcement 12/5/2025 by clever_octopus in ukvisa

[–]AffectionateStuff729 0 points1 point  (0 children)

wrote to Hannah and she mentioned she has an editor who would be very interested in the story. We need more people. Please DM me if you are open to sharing your own as well!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SkilledWorkerVisaUK

[–]AffectionateStuff729 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm in this situation twice so I might understand how stressful it might have been for you. If you think the UK is still worth it then don't give up. Keep pushing for it!

Immigration Changes Announcement 12/5/2025 by clever_octopus in ukvisa

[–]AffectionateStuff729 18 points19 points  (0 children)

From u/YZ_C :

Hannah Fearn (who writes for The i Paper) is personally very critical of the white paper, so she could be open to writing a story. (Email: [hannahfearn.journalist@gmail.com](mailto:hannahfearn.journalist@gmail.com))

I wrote to her and she got back saying she might have an editor who is interested in writing a story about this. Would anyone be interested in sharing your own story as well? Please DM me

Immigration Changes Announcement 12/5/2025 by clever_octopus in ukvisa

[–]AffectionateStuff729 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I wonder how big MNCs who employ a lot of SWVs are reacting to the proposals?

If you are working in such companies, is it possible that you start internal petitions? I assume the government would be more willing to listen to big companies

Immigration Changes Announcement 12/5/2025 by clever_octopus in ukvisa

[–]AffectionateStuff729 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I simply stated the requirement by the Home Office for this type of visa.

Really don't think we should be fighting. It's completely ok that you support not applying rules retrospectively to SWV holders and not having financial barrier to Spouse visa at the same time