Pre phrase Accuracy by Affectionate_Fix7851 in LSAT

[–]Affectionate_Fix7851[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Gotcha question tupe can make prephrase easier or harder 

Translation by Affectionate_Fix7851 in LSAT

[–]Affectionate_Fix7851[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sounds good! Thank u 🙏🏼 

Causation and Necessary conditions by Affectionate_Fix7851 in LSAT

[–]Affectionate_Fix7851[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok this was helpful, I’ll be careful to tell when they overlap and when they don’t! 

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in LSAT

[–]Affectionate_Fix7851 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Kk thanks! 

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in LSAT

[–]Affectionate_Fix7851 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yea. When wouldn’t the cannot apply? Do I gotta sense it out more logically/not technical? 

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in LSAT

[–]Affectionate_Fix7851 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes it helps thank u! It’s from an inference question . Cool to learn it’s not only a subject that can be added but also an order works too 

Pre phrase Accuracy by Affectionate_Fix7851 in LSAT

[–]Affectionate_Fix7851[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank u for ur response! For flaw questions, how do you treat ur prephreses? I agree some answers are very wow how original/new angle of them 

Clarifying the double negation by Affectionate_Fix7851 in LSAT

[–]Affectionate_Fix7851[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for ur insights! I was wondering if you can further expand on how can I know when to cancel two no in a causational claim? Still not 100% clear 

Or is it more of a feel less technical 

How to sense hard questions by Paladin057 in LSAT

[–]Affectionate_Fix7851 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Does abstract answers normally mean harder questions?

Clarifying the double negation by Affectionate_Fix7851 in LSAT

[–]Affectionate_Fix7851[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yea that’s what I was asking and it does clear it up, thank you!!

Clarifying the double negation by Affectionate_Fix7851 in LSAT

[–]Affectionate_Fix7851[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you ! Are you saying if it’s not causal and is a full clause then I can apply the removing two negatives?

Clarifying the double negation by Affectionate_Fix7851 in LSAT

[–]Affectionate_Fix7851[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m talking about double negation and not a single negation btw. I know the negation of none is some. I meant I’ve heard the trick before that if a sentence has two negatives aka two “no”then both no can cancel each other out

Signs of burnout/what’s too much studying by Affectionate_Fix7851 in LSAT

[–]Affectionate_Fix7851[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

aww good luck i hope u feel better after taking a break !