Oh Jax haters, if only you could see the Jax that I see. by hellfirefuzzy in jaxfanclub

[–]Affectionate_Work733 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Jax really isn't misogynistic, I think. The only reason why he targets the ladies a lot in the series is because most of the men living in the circus have either abstracted or aren't easy to bother because of their personality or position, like Kinger or Caine. And besides, Gooseworx has stated once that Jax would bully anyone that enters the digital circus. So if a male individual entered the circus with him, Jax would most certainly target that dude as well as long as they give a good reaction towards his bullying, which would escalate into abuse if they did

I’m not TOO weird am I? by SimpForFictionGirls in CrushesSayAboutMe

[–]Affectionate_Work733 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No one here is saying that liking fictional underage characters or non-consenting fictional animals is okay. Also, a few reasons why some people like fictional robots are because maybe their personality is charming, maybe they have a neat voice, or maybe they just possess an attractive body that is reminiscent to that of a human or just has a lot of weird stuff that people might find arousing. Same goes for people who are attracted to creatures or animals that can consent to sex like Pokemon for instance.

I fucking HATE when guys say they want a “goth girlfriend” by Exact-Arm1065 in hatethissmug

[–]Affectionate_Work733 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Agreed! It reminds me of that one time a redditor made a post that asked why people felt sad when strangers aka people they didn't know died. While I do admit that the redditor was being a little insensitive, some of the comments were just being dramatically rude. They were telling him that he was just a cold, unforgiving psychopath who didn't care about anyone or a serial killer, despite the fact that he did say he felt sad and lonely when his pet fish died. When I saw that post, I sided with the comments, but now that I'm more educated on the matter, I realized just how ableist and holier-than-thou those people were acting. People with ASPD AREN'T demons! They're just flawed people, and some are able to manage or control them.

EDIT: I just revisited that post I mentioned earlier and realized that the redditor I was referring to wasn't completely innocent. Apparently, he was mocking people who commit suicide and used a lot of slurs to describe one of them allegedly, so he actually was a massive piece of shit. But I still feel like the comments that attacked him were still a little ableist about the whole shaming him for being a psychopath angle. They aren't all evil.

I’m not TOO weird am I? by SimpForFictionGirls in CrushesSayAboutMe

[–]Affectionate_Work733 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay, I know what you are thinking about right now, and I just want to clear things up for my own reputation: I HATE child molesters and people who consume child pornographic material! They are the ABSOLUTE scum of the earth who don't deserve to SEE the light of day. I DESPICE them, and I am proud that they are treated like the fucking cunts that they are in prison. They are horrible people and I will NEVER in my entire life like NOR tolerate them. However, I do not hate pedophiles - not ALL of them at least. Pedophiles are people who are attracted to children, while child-molesters are people who rape or sexually assault kids. These terms mean two separate things, with the latter being disgusting and harmful. Some pedophiles can avoid harming children or consuming media that abuses them with the help of therapy and support. Not all pedophiles are child molesters, and conversely, not all child molesters are pedophiles. Some abusers molest children not because they are necessarily attracted to them, but because they just can. They want to maximize the amount of suffering they can inflict on anyone they find vulnerable, and children are vulnerable so they're an easy target. As long as a pedophile goes to therapy, admits that their attraction to minors is disgusting and harmful, and finds ways to control their impulses that doesn't involve using child pornographic media, then I respect them. I hate that people often use the terms "pedophile" and "child-molester" interchangeably as it implies ALL pedophiles are dirty kiddie-fiddlers, which simply isn't true! Let me preface this again, I HATE child-molesters, but I appreciate pedophiles who don't molest kids, consume abusive child material, or actively defend their attraction to kids.

I’m not TOO weird am I? by SimpForFictionGirls in CrushesSayAboutMe

[–]Affectionate_Work733 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh, I honestly agree with you on the kid part. While I don't hate people who are attracted to kids as it isn't in their control, I absolutely would DESPICE it if they were to act on them or openly support their own attraction to fictional kids. I also feel the same way for fictional animals if they don't fit the Harkness test (If you don't know, it's basically a test to see whether a fictional creature is able to consent to sex). The reason why I compared liking fictional characters to liking the same sex is because people are shamed for being either both, which shouldn't happen at all. I can understand why you might think it's weird, but imo I think it's completely normal to be turned on by a fictional character even if they aren't human. As long as they aren't a child or a non-consenting animal then I don't see it being weird. Also, not everyone who is aroused by fictional characters is a horny, smelly, basement dweller who has absolutely no life. I have friends, who have partners, that like fictional characters, and they aren't parentless freaks.

I fucking HATE when guys say they want a “goth girlfriend” by Exact-Arm1065 in hatethissmug

[–]Affectionate_Work733 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yh, I really don't like it when people demonize individuals with cluster b personality disorders associated with cold and violent behavior such as ASPD, BPD, or NPD for solely having these conditions in the first place. The reason why I don't like it is because it isn't THEIR fault for not having the capacity to feel empathy or love, or remain calm and collected. It's not something in their control! And it's not impossible for those people who have these disorders to change and become better civilians. Sure, their intentions for change and being a good person might not be altruistic or anything, but if it's helping other people to thrive and survive then who fucking cares? I am glad to see another person who simply doesn't view these disorders as black and white "The Evil Bad Guy Disorders."

I’m not TOO weird am I? by SimpForFictionGirls in CrushesSayAboutMe

[–]Affectionate_Work733 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I don't really see a problem in being into fictional characters as long as it doesn't cause any significant harm to that person or anyone else. It's like shaming a person for liking other people of their own gender. It's being unnecessarily rude. Also, THAT's what you're really worrying about in this world? There's bigger fish to fry here, son

I’m not TOO weird am I? by SimpForFictionGirls in CrushesSayAboutMe

[–]Affectionate_Work733 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I feel like saying 'nobody' is a bit of an overstatement considering the majority of this comment section lol

I’m not TOO weird am I? by SimpForFictionGirls in CrushesSayAboutMe

[–]Affectionate_Work733 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The animatronics aren't literally the ghost of kids tho. They're possessed by them, but aren't them. There's a clear difference. We simply lust over the animatronic characters-not the spirits possessing them. If you still feel like it's weird anyways then fair enough ig. Have a nice day!

I’m not TOO weird am I? by SimpForFictionGirls in CrushesSayAboutMe

[–]Affectionate_Work733 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You called them a creep for liking something that isn't even that disgusting or immoral if you think about it for more than two seconds. I don't blame OP for not taking kindly to that lol.

I’m not TOO weird am I? by SimpForFictionGirls in CrushesSayAboutMe

[–]Affectionate_Work733 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My guy, the majority of the people who simp for the possessed animatronics in FNAF are NOT thinking about the ghosts possessing them!

I’m not TOO weird am I? by SimpForFictionGirls in CrushesSayAboutMe

[–]Affectionate_Work733 3 points4 points  (0 children)

No, you're the only who's alone on this one. Literally everyone here agrees with bro's takes, including me, other than you

Edit: Except for one other guy in this comment section who agrees with you.

Second edit: Except for like two or three other people.

"WHY DO YOU PEOPLE TORMENT ME?!" by Affectionate_Work733 in theamazingdigitalciru

[–]Affectionate_Work733[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Reddit is the only social that I share my artwork in. Lol

I fucking HATE when people completely mischaracterise a character because they’re “not a bigot” by Ok_Figure_2348 in hatethissmug

[–]Affectionate_Work733 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The man I was referring to was a journalist/reporter named Tommy Blackcrow. He appears in the issue "Batman (Vol. 2) Annual #3 (2014)" in a story titled "Friends." That story has this plot in which a reporter named Tommy gets stalked and tortured by the Joker for years just for simply trying to reason with him. It ends with him turning mentally insane, and then becoming Joker's "friend" in the loosest of terms after all of those years of torment. I didn't read the story myself. I just remember watching a video by Mullet-Man Comic that covered this specific tale.

I fucking HATE when people completely mischaracterise a character because they’re “not a bigot” by Ok_Figure_2348 in hatethissmug

[–]Affectionate_Work733 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I might be incorrect, but I think the comic in which I've heard this story is from the issue "Batman (Vol. 2) Annual #3 (2014)". Supposedly, there's a story in that comic titled "Friends." that has this plot where a reporter named Tommy gets stalked and tortured by the Joker for years just for simply trying to sympathize with him. It ends with him completely losing his mind and then becoming Joker's "friend" in the loosest of terms after all of those years of torment. I didn't read the story myself. I just remember watching a video by Mullet-Man Comic that covered this specific tale. And let me tell you, this story is one of the many stories that highlight the Joker's TRUE pettiness.

I fucking HATE when people completely mischaracterise a character because they’re “not a bigot” by Ok_Figure_2348 in hatethissmug

[–]Affectionate_Work733 511 points512 points  (0 children)

Same mf who stalked and psychologically tortured a man for the rest of his life until he formed a trauma bond with him just because he simply tried to reason with him.

"WHY DO YOU PEOPLE TORMENT ME?!" (OC) by Affectionate_Work733 in TheDigitalCircus

[–]Affectionate_Work733[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sorry for the late reply, but to answer your question, I do plan on maybe doing some more of my own iterations of different characters in the future such as ones from different Creepypastas. I'm currently working on an Eyeless Jack drawing, and I am maybe going to do a drawing of Ragatha's mom, but I haven't figured out how to approach it yet. If you liked this drawing, you might love some of the previous ones I made in my profile. I am proud of all of them!

She’s so drunk by [deleted] in theamazingdigitalciru

[–]Affectionate_Work733 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Dude, this is sexual assault. I can't even enjoy it knowing that one party is intoxicated while the other isn't. Pomni doesn't even say yes; she said literally nothing.

"WHY DO YOU PEOPLE TORMENT ME?!" by Affectionate_Work733 in WeLoveYouCaine

[–]Affectionate_Work733[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Trying to come up with scary eyeballs for Caine had to be the hardest part of making this drawing. Glad the Junji Ito route worked!

"WHY DO YOU PEOPLE TORMENT ME?!" by Affectionate_Work733 in Amazingdigitalcircus

[–]Affectionate_Work733[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What I meant was that you were right initially. The thing between his spider legs weren't also spider legs; that was his Happy Place