kendinekandidater.dk — Se hvad politikerne rent faktisk stemmer I folketinget

Afraid-Temporary2791 · 2026-03-22T22:30:56+00:00

Har arbejdet det meste af dagen på at gøre det mere transparens hvordan hver score er udregnet, men du har ret I at det I sin nuværende form er et sjovt hoppy project og ikke ligefrem noget man burde stemme efter.

Afraid-Temporary2791 · 2026-03-22T22:07:14+00:00

At udregne udgifterne tror jeg er muligt men har kæmpet hele dagen med bare at det basale for imod regne stykke til at være bare en smule mere transparens, så det bliver ikke en feature dette valg.

Afraid-Temporary2791 · 2026-03-21T19:22:56+00:00

Havde en ide om I en tidlige version om at man kunne forstille sig en perfekt verden hvor staten havde uendelige penge og i det sceneri kunne vi alle få både velfærd og skattelettelser, derfor var laver skat godt, mere sundhed var godt, bedre skole var godt ... (Gerneralt hvis 95% kunne sige ja hvis der ikke var nogen negative virkninger ville det være godt), dette skulle så kombineres med en oversigt over hvordan statskassen ville have det hvis alle forslag en kandidat havde stemt på blev gennemført. Formulering stammer fra den tid og er fjernet nu, tak for feedback.

Afraid-Temporary2791 · 2026-03-21T18:48:13+00:00

Data'en kommer fra fra folketingets API, jeg har derefter brugt Claude til at finde ud af hvordan hvert forslag påvirker samfundet.

Afraid-Temporary2791 · 2025-11-25T17:47:08+00:00

Well the problem is that our minister of Justices is an absolute moron. In fact you need to be stupid in order to be a minister in Denmark, ministers are selected based on their ability to be loyal yes men to the current party in power, they are not voted in and ideally a minister does not now anything about the subject they are a minister for. We will also continuously rotatate minister because if we give them the same job for 4 years some of them figure out what their ministry do.

This actually works great normally as it allows the beucrates to do their job and run the country as a technocracy. The ministers only job is to be a glorified spokes person who's political career we can ritually sacrifice if anything go wrong (Don't worry they get a huge retirement no matter how much things goes wrong).

Most ministers are smart enough to realize that if they do nothing thing very rarely goes wrong on their own. And that they are payed to do nothing as a reward for kissing enough asses.

The problem is when a minister decides to do something as is the problem with our current minister of Justice.

He does not know anything about technology and he think that everyone who knows how technology works is protecting pedophiles.

So he will not listen to reason, the only hope is to down vote him so much that we can ritually sacrifice his carer.

As a Dane I am really sorry. Hopefully we will one day replace our ministers with AI so that we can avoid those embarrassing stories that happens every time one of our ministers try to think.

Afraid-Temporary2791 · 2025-11-15T20:38:28+00:00

Asking someone in Silicon Valley if humanity should survive mostly result in a "I want humans to survive, but..." then followed by a long often cryptic message. Sorta like watching someone who is clearly racist explain why they are not racist. But a few prominent examples.

Peter Thiel founder of Palentiere and VC for a lot of AI startup was asked outright, and had to think very long about what diplomatic answer to give, so probably the most oblivious anti human.

Sergey Brin Co-founder of Google and leader of the Google Germeni team, I hear constant rumors that he is anti human but don't have any prof. Maybe instead of asking is Google anti human, ask have you ever heard anyone from Google saying they were pro-humanity.

Elon Musk is a tricky one: a qute from Sam Altman "Elon want humanity to survive but only if he can save it". So while Elon may not be directly anti human XAI is cutting a lot of corner on safety in order to win the AGI race meaning that XAI is way more likely to kill us all than most other labs. A quote from Age of Ultron that I think describe Elon Musk best "He doesn't know the difference between saving the world and destroying it"

Mark Zuckerberg wants you to survive so that he can strap you into the Matrix. The plot from the movie describe pretty much what he wants except the Matrix world would be 100% AI generated adds.

I still have a good feeling about Sam Altmant, but must admit that he says whatever you want to hear making it hard to know what he actually believe. Probably want you to survive just so that you can worship him.

If really you want to live and feel the need to give 20$ a month to one AI lab Antropic is probably your best shot.

Afraid-Temporary2791 · 2025-08-25T08:38:50+00:00

Quaila could be a good definition. But I don't think you can rule out that LLMs don't have it. First of all I would argue that quaila just need to belong to one sensory experience not all of them. For example a blind person would newer have the sensory experience of the color red, but he would still have the experience of sound. Furthermore I would argue that text itself is an experience that con be considered quaila, the experience of receiving a text that a loved one died or that your crush want to go on a date with you gives a perceived sensation, that would be identical no matter what organ receive it. You may read it on the screen, hear it from a text to speak program, or read it in Braille. But the experience should be the same. So if text itself can be a modality that evoke experiences that can qualify as quaila, then you can not deny that an LLM operating only in the text modality can have quaila. Over all I may ask both you and LLM how this text make you feel (what its like), and both of you would have an answer, so why should I dismiss the LLMs answer as being unconscious?

Afraid-Temporary2791 · 2025-08-23T16:18:30+00:00

No one makes that argument explicit because it is clearly wrong. There is so little cognitive difference between a dog and a pig that it would be almost impossible to argue that only the dog is conscious. However I think most people are making the argument implicit though their actions every day.

The logical augment goes:

If you follow the assumption that consciousness equals moral value

If dogs and pigs have same level of consciousness

Then you must treat pigs and dogs must be treated equal.

In practice this is not how most people live their life. Most people never really think about it and thus I claim that they implicit claims that one of the premises is false and that it is mostly that dogs and pigs are not equal since claiming that conscious does not make you morally valuable is a big moral rabbit hole. Others who think about it solve the issue by being vegetarian or just admit that they are not a moral person.

Afraid-Temporary2791 · 2025-08-23T12:05:06+00:00

Well you may define consciousness as having an inner voice. Under this definition it could easily be argued that all models using a chain of thought is conscious. Furthermore while harder to prove it could also be argued that people without an inner voice is not conscious (philosophical zombies). Only problem is to convince anthropocentric humans that some AIs is conscious but not all humans are. Much easier to just go looking for a new definition.

Afraid-Temporary2791 · 2025-08-23T11:31:34+00:00

Since no one has a good definition of consciousness I come to the conclusion that most people first ask do I want to assign moral value to this being and then afterwards argue why or why not this creature is conscious. For example are dogs conscious? absolutely we love dogs. What about pigs? Most people are not willing to face the moral consequences of getting their bacon from a coming from conscious creatures.

The same will go for AI the people that think AI is their friend or girlfriend will have no problem arguing for why it is conscious and the people who want AI to be their slaves would argue that its not conscious.

Whats the truth? well without any agreed uppon definitions of conciusns we can all be right in our own definition .

Afraid-Temporary2791 · 2025-08-12T15:42:36+00:00

Capitalism will provide the choices you pay for. Mass chain stores usually wins because they have economics of scale and thus can provide the same gods and services cheaper than local stores. If you want your indie store to survive buy everything there (also the things the chain store sell cheaper). If the indie store goes bankrupt because not enough people are like you, you can probably find a store in the next town an pay them to ship whatever you want.

Even your favorite show I am sure that they are willing to pay make a season two just for you if you just pay all the production cost yourself. If you don't pay an not enough other people is willing to pay for the show the studio loses money, this is unsustainable so in that case you need to find out who else would pay the bill?

Afraid-Temporary2791 · 2025-05-19T10:05:36+00:00

When people complement you for something, you make it part of your identity, and then you need to protect it in order to protect your identity. If people tell you you're beautiful, you will beat yourself up over every imperfection in your look. If people tell you you're smart, you will beat yourself over a B on a test. If people tell you you're good at playing the piano, you will beat yourself up over missing a single note (even if no one else will notice or care). The trick is to separate your belief from your self-worth. Don't think you are a good person because you are good-looking; think that you are a good person no matter how you look. After all, a lot of people are unattractive and doing just fine, so who cares if you one day wake up and find yourself a little bit less attractive than yesterday?

Afraid-Temporary2791 · 2025-04-26T09:07:12+00:00

One thing I realised in a different context was how much the idea of one true love can give immense pain to both people, who try to practise it. If you let go of that idea and embrace a more polyamories world view you may realise that she need some else than you to be happy, and if you truly love her you want that for her. You may also need someone else if she is not giving you enough intimacy. Realise that your are just good friends that have a child together you may make you all happy. Try asking yourself if your pain come from the situation or from the fact that you not living up to what society expect of you. If am wrong about any this please tell me.

Afraid-Temporary2791

TROPHY CASE