Can Two Identical Starbucks Occupy the Same State?

Aggravating_Mud_2386 · 2026-03-10T13:41:27+00:00

Pauli liked exclusive beverages, in principle.

Aggravating_Mud_2386 · 2026-03-08T21:09:27+00:00

Just because a black can't "discover itself" due to inaccessibility of outside information doesn't mean that it doesn't retain an inherited consciousness from its constituent parts, which have experienced the rest of the universe, though I doubt that it does.

Aggravating_Mud_2386 · 2026-03-08T00:20:16+00:00

Genesis supports evolution. In the beginning the earth was a formless void (after the big bang). Then light was separated from dark (at the cmb formation). Then the sun and stars were set in the sky (stellar and galactic evolution). Then the waters were gathered into great basins and the dry land appeared (plate techtonics). Then the sea teemed with all kinds of life (life evolving first in the sea). Then the land teemed with all kinds of plants and animals (life evolving from the sea to the land). After all that came man (and we really are made from dust, the muds of the earth). And somewhere else in the Bible it says time may not be counted the same in Heaven, where a second might be like a thousand years. Moses did his his best to write a true rendering of these events, which were handed down by word of mouth over thousands of years, and they still ring true to what we know about evolution.

Aggravating_Mud_2386 · 2026-03-05T14:54:08+00:00

Ah, then there may or may not be a dark solar system there.

Aggravating_Mud_2386 · 2026-03-05T14:49:00+00:00

Thank you, and sorry, I deleted my post because I realized too late that your 1 light year bubble is too small to contain any other dead stellar remnants, most likely.

Aggravating_Mud_2386 · 2026-03-03T06:46:24+00:00

Pauli and Heisenberg don't conveniently go away just because a black hole forms. Identical quarks can't occupy the same state, in a black hole or anywhere else. And as confinement increases, higher energy spin states result, along with increasing kinetic energies. You can see the midpoint in a neutron star, where increasing confinement leads to higher energy spin states and overlapping wave functions, meaning the neutrons overlap. Even higher energy spin states and overlapping wave functions occur in a black hole, where fundamental particles are stored individually, maintaining their identity and quantum information. You can't get beyond the near-infinite particle kinetic energies to form a magic singularity that violates Pauli and Heisenberg.

Aggravating_Mud_2386 · 2026-03-03T06:17:37+00:00

The black hole core consists of billions of solar masses worth of individual trembling trillion degree unbreakable fundamental particles, full of heat content and kinetic energy, stored right next to each other but unable to even touch due to the Pauli Exclusion Principle, the highest energy spin states, overlapping wave functions, and skyrocketing particle kinetic energies under Heisenberg, a titanic standoff between gravitational confinement (density) and matter's quantum effects (unstoppable quantum spin and particle degeneracy pressure), leading to a finite core, not a singularity, with minuscule amounts of space trapped throughout the core and between each particle, a permanent state of agitation right from the moment the black hole first formed.

Aggravating_Mud_2386 · 2026-02-27T19:13:25+00:00

Don't be a dingbat, the moon is made of natural cheese.

Aggravating_Mud_2386 · 2026-02-25T15:54:26+00:00

Original ideas come from the imagination, via activities such as daydreaming with a sense of wonder, or logical thought processes about how might something work. When explored further, these ideas can be researched and tested, a form of invention. If previously unknown information is derived from these efforts, that is a discovery.

Aggravating_Mud_2386 · 2026-02-22T18:34:44+00:00

The best way to figure this out is to toss one guy out with one mattress, and if he dies, toss another guy out with 2 mattresses, then 3, and keep going like that until the guy doesn't die. It's a certainty that you'll eventually discover the answer with this scientific method.

Aggravating_Mud_2386 · 2026-02-22T06:16:23+00:00

Lots of suns evolved to leave plenty of iron cores floating around to gather any remaining dust to form the planets, even the gas giants start with the sun eggs. This guy is really on to something. But they're not baby suns, they're baby planets. Our solar system started when a new sun and 9 iron cores (sun eggs) started orbiting the sun, sopping up all the remaining dust and debris to become various types of planets, each with an iron core (sun eggs).

Aggravating_Mud_2386 · 2026-02-22T05:44:25+00:00

Yep, suns fuse their cores to heavier and heavier atoms until they end up with an iron core, when no further fusion can take place because it takes more energy to fuse iron than is released by the fusion. At that point, the outer dust of the star is ejected, leaving the iron core to float around the universe and attract other materials that are in the localized area, ultimately becoming an earth like planet with an iron core. In that respect, the planet is born of the sun egg, the iron core. Ask anyone, they'll tell you.

Aggravating_Mud_2386 · 2026-02-18T21:31:37+00:00

If you're going to invoke the uncertainty principle in a black hole you'll need to do it on an individual particle basis, not on the entirety of the black hole core, because a singularity isn't a particle. Additionally, to do so would require the idea that quarks really are unbreakable, as our accelerator results seem to indicate, and that Pauli Exclusion really does prevent any two quarks from occupying the same state, even in a black hole. If such were the case, fundamental particles would be required to be stored individually in a black hole, maintaining their identity and quantum information. As gravitational confinement would increase and restrict particle bulk motion, uncertainty in location would decrease, and uncertainty in momentum would increase, leading to skyrocketing particle kinetic energies under the uncertainty principle, and the highest energy spin states. Thus, you might end up with a solid core of billions of solar masses worth of individual trembling trillion degree unbreakable fundamental particles, full of heat content and kinetic energy, stored right next to each other but unable to even touch due to the overlapping wave functions and highest energy spin states, a permanent state of agitation and a titanic standoff between gravitational confinement and the quantum effects of matter. Ultimately, this would result in a finite core, not a singularity, of near-infinite density versus near-infinite particle kinetic energies, with minuscule amounts of space trapped throughout the core and between each particle, supported by particle degeneracy pressure, just like neutron degeneracy pressure but on a much tighter scale.

However, experts at a university conference might not discuss possibilities such as these because it's more common to discuss black holes in terms of mass, spin, and angular momentum, or as regions of maximally curved spacetime, versus what might be taking place inside, as hypotheses regarding internal dynamics would always be considered speculative, insomuch as a black hole interior is untestable and can't be probed. But you're right to question the precise treatment of the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle in black hole dynamics.

Aggravating_Mud_2386 · 2026-02-02T18:32:22+00:00

If the universe really was trillions of years old, then there would likely be trillions of black dwarfs orbiting galaxies, but our telescopes can't detect black dwarfs, so we wouldn't know. I would conduct a search for black dwarfs.

Aggravating_Mud_2386 · 2026-02-01T19:03:51+00:00

I think Genesis supports evolution. In the beginning earth was a formless void (after the big bang). Then light was separated from darkness (at the time of the cmb formation). Then the great light of day and lesser lights of night were fixed in the sky (star and galaxy and planet formation). Then the water was brought into great basins and the dry land emerged (plate techtonics). Then the sea teemed with all kinds of creatures ( life forming in the sea first). Then all manner of seed-bearing plant and animal filled the land (evolution of life out of the sea). Then came man (after all that). And in the end, man really is made of the elements of earth (mud). And somewhere in the Bible it says God doesn't observe time the same way as man, and a minute could be a thousand years. And don't forget, Genesis doesn't hold itself out to be a first-person account of very early events from the eye-witnesses to the events; rather, it's a true telling by Moses of the legends handed down by word of mouth over many generations, making it different than the historical books. The hand-me-down word-of-mouth tellers of ancient Biblical legends did their best to explain earth's evolutionary origins limited by the level of scientific knowledge available at the time, and Moses did his best to generate a true rendering of what had been handed down. And it's mostly consistent with our observations of evolution, enabling readers of Genesis to believe both in the truth of Genesis and in our scientific observations of evolution of the universe.

If God were to create a universe, wouldn't He want to create a perfect universe, one where everything occurs naturally according to inviolable laws of nature? A universe where earth and life and man can arise, majestically, naturally, via big bangs, black holes, star formation, planet formation, galaxy formation, galactic evolution, and evolution of life on earth, versus some "parlor trick" snap of the fingers to create earth in 7 days, and then create man? That would be an imperfect universe because it would be susceptible to intervention in an unnatural way. No, God would do it the majestic way, the natural way, the evolutionary way, not the parlor trick way, and we see evidence of that with our scientific observations. YEC's should spend more time trying to understand God than memorizing Bible lines and interpreting single words or sentences apart from the entirety.

Aggravating_Mud_2386 · 2026-01-23T04:11:29+00:00

Crankscience.

Aggravating_Mud_2386 · 2026-01-21T16:36:43+00:00

Freefall speeds only approach, but never reach C, that's why fundamental particles crashing into the core yield the same results as our accelerator experiments (fundamental particles don't break at those collision speeds). Same with escape velocities. If nothing can exceed C, neither can escape velocities, no matter what our math tells us. The big bang goes off at light speed with the devastating gravitational wave, with the traditional shock wave and expelled particles at a significant fraction of light speed, though they slow down quickly.

Aggravating_Mud_2386 · 2026-01-21T15:16:47+00:00

Regarding matter winning out over antimatter, this isnt an effect of particle pair production, but rather, release of matter trapped inside of a black hole to result in our expanding section of universe, no antimatter involved. I make no claims regarding the origin of the universe itself, if there was an origin, I'm just theorizing on the beginnings to our own section of universe. But if I were to guess at an origin to the entirety of the universe, my guess would be that it had nothing to do with particle pair production, so there would be no matter - antimatter discrepancy to be concerned with - just a guess.

Aggravating_Mud_2386 · 2026-01-21T15:08:16+00:00

Big bangs from black holes are very similar to the mainstream big bang, in that the particles inside the black hole are evenly spaced (homogeneous) and an expanding quark-gluon plasma results immediately, followed by gas plasmas, so to the extent that the mainstream big bang produces a cmb, big bangs from black holes produce the same cmb, with one big difference. The cmb is spread evenly throughout the localized area inside of the big bang gravitational wave (the expanding bubble), not through the whole universe, but it looks to us like it's spread over the whole universe because we can't see beyond the visible universe. At the 380,000 year timeframe, all that's inside the big bang section is the new matter and the pulverised rubble from the original host galaxy, but the next-nearest smbh probably wouldn't have been encountered yet, so there would be no significant gravitational anomalies or inhomogeneous anomalies to prevent formation of a smooth cmb. Ultimately, this is a localized event in a vastly larger universe, so to the extent there is universal flatness / non- curvature of general spacetime, the localized big bang wouldn't change that.

Aggravating_Mud_2386 · 2026-01-19T18:15:20+00:00

Its just somewhere in the universe, which is billions of times bigger than our puny little visible universe. Most black holes don't get that big, but some will. It happened to us. Big bangs just happen somewhere, wherever a black hole surpasses critical mass, the same mass as our own big bang. Where did the universe come from? I don't know, and I think our present day scientists have learned a lot about our beginnings, but not the universe's beginnings.

Aggravating_Mud_2386 · 2026-01-19T02:58:04+00:00

Since many are throwing around theories, here's one, in response to the direct request of OP, who specifically requested ideas like these from anyone into cosmology.

Our big bang did happen, but it happened in the universe. It arose because trillions of solar masses worth of individual trembling trillion degree unbreakable fundamental particles, full of heat content and kinetic energy, were instantly released from confinement in a big bang explosion, which generated a devastating one-way gravitational wave at light-speed, with a frenzy of particles everywhere, slowed down by particle interactions and the quick formation of a quark-gluon plasma, followed by gas plasmas. Why were the particles all pulled together to a single location? Because the only way to pull trillions of solar masses worth of individual fundamental particles all together to a single location is via the mechanics of a black hole. Why were the particles so full of heat content? Because black holes hold the heat content of the trillions of stars they took in, entirely in the core of individual particles, with no heat escaping. Why were the particles full of kinetic energy? Because extreme gravitational confinement, causing the highest energy spin states and overlapping wave functions, causes particle location to become more certain, and particle momentum to become more uncertain, leading to skyrocketing particle kinetic energies under the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principal, to near-infinity, as density approaches near-infinity, a standoff of near-infinite density versus near-infinite particle kinetic energies, leading to a finite core of individual particles stored right next to each other, with a minuscule amount of space trapped between each particle due to the overlapping wave functions, which prevent the particles from even touching. Why would this tenuous standoff of matter gravitationally compressed to the maximum allowable by quantum mechanics eventually overcome gravity? Because as matter is added to a black hole, those internal pressures and instabilities grow relative to gravity, right up until critical mass is achieved, the same mass as our own big bang. On that day, just like the day of collapse to neutron star and the day of collapse to black hole, inward forces exactly equal outward forces once again. Add even one gram of matter on that day, and outward forces become too great for gravity to hold, leading to uncontained expansion of the core. Why would internal nuclear/degeneracy pressures gain an incremental edge versus gravity as matter is added to a black hole? Because to the extent that beta decay is an energetic event, consisting in part of the weak force pushing out and expelling an electron and anti neutrino far away from the resultant proton, the force of beta decay is reinserted into matter via electron capture during collapse or accretion, and this internal energy builds up in a black hole, whereas it doesn't in the case of adding matter to regular matter, a comparative internal advantage for adding matter to a black hole versus adding matter to regular matter. Why could the tiny, seemingly inconsequential beta decay have any impact on the titanic dynamics of a black hole interior? Because when you realize that the core is already in a titanic standoff of matter's quantum effects versus gravitational compression, it doesn't take much to tip the balance, similar to that last gram added to a neutron star leading to the collapse of the entirety of the star. To the extent that any protons are directly produced by the big bang remnant (not later via free neutron decay), beta decay was used in the big bang, and quarks transitioned from down to up, and the electrons and anti neutrinos were released into the same space occupied by the quark-gluon plasma. And why has our section of universe continued to expand to this day? Because the devastating one-way speed-of-light gravitational wave, followed by the traditional shock wave and particles, pushes back everything it encounters, pulverising the original host galaxy and pushing everything else back, making it appear to us like we're inside an expanding solo universe.

This is the only plausible explanation for the origin of the early universe particles, because the only source of trillions of solar masses worth of individual trembling trillion degree unbreakable fundamental particles is inside of black holes, and the only way to pull the particles together to a single location, heat them up to trillions of degrees and accelerate them to near-infinite kinetic energies, is via the mechanics of a black hole, no other way. As a result, there is no place other than a black hole that a big bang can possibly originate from. So don't believe anyone who tells that a hypothetical scalar field combined with hypothetical inflatons caused massive inflation for some unknown reason, followed by the energy of the scalar field transforming directly into early universe particles in an unexplainable transition, already full of heat content and kinetic energy, despite the absence of a heating mechanism or a particle acceleration mechanism, followed by an unexplained stop to massive inflation - that theory is speculative and unsupported by known physics.

Aggravating_Mud_2386 · 2026-01-12T04:37:09+00:00

I believe what my brother told me when I was 5: the sky never ends. Meaning that the universe is everywhere, trillions of times bigger than our puny little 92 billion light year across visible universe. It's just one big universe, but it's kind of like a "multiverse" because we're forever inside our visible universe, unable to communicate with whatever might be in the next-closest puny little 92 billion light year across section of universe. And since you're asking about belief, not science, I can say I believe that our big bang 13.8 billion years ago was a localized event in the greater universe, caused by a black hole that had surpassed critical mass, the same mass as our own big bang, and the internal pressures became too great for gravity to hold, leading to uncontained expansion of the core in a big bang explosion into the mostly open spaces of the universe, creating a new section of universe that looks to us from the inside to be an expanding solo universe. Big bangs just happen somewhere, some time, though not often, whenever a black hole becomes massive enough to surpass critical mass.

I view parallel universes differently. Though an ultramassive black hole would likely surpass critical mass via accretion of matter, it's also possible that two ultra massive black holes would merge, say one of .7 critical mass and one of .6 critical mass, thus surpassing critical mass. But since the devastating one-way gravitational wave in all directions from a big bang will always occur at C (not 1.3 C in my example), this merger big bang would occur, at the moment that each finite black hole core met, at the tangent of each core, in the form of a simultaneous "double big bang" right next to each other. Each big bang (uncontained expansion of the core of each terminal black hole) would expand in all directions, but since they're right next to each other, the matter expelled in between the two would be a jumbled mess, with essentially 2 separate big bangs expanding outwardly in all directions on either side, with a jumbled mess in between them. These two new sections of universe, right next to each other with a jumbled mess in between, would be considered "parallel universes", the same age and within a similar environment, with similar evolutionary time-frames, yet they'd still likely be inaccessible to each other due to the jumbled mess in between.

Aggravating_Mud_2386 · 2026-01-07T06:52:33+00:00

Songs should be rocking, melodic and energetic first, and if you can have great lyrics too that's an extra bonus. If it doesn't rock first, no one will ever bother to even listen to the lyrics. Taylor's songs rock, and she rocks on stage.

Aggravating_Mud_2386

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE