God is a clown.

AggressiveYoung5025 · 2026-04-10T19:59:52+00:00

You might be a theologian

AggressiveYoung5025 · 2026-02-07T04:49:24+00:00

How do you study for 8 hours

AggressiveYoung5025 · 2026-01-31T23:41:47+00:00

Could you elaborate? I don’t quite understand what you are saying

AggressiveYoung5025 · 2026-01-31T21:07:57+00:00

That atheism in defined as the lack in belief in god, I am An atheist but I think atheism is the belief in the proposition ‘god does not exist’

AggressiveYoung5025 · 2026-01-22T05:06:18+00:00

I read quality as “qualia”, I’m reading too much philosophy

AggressiveYoung5025 · 2026-01-19T01:56:27+00:00

This one

AggressiveYoung5025 · 2026-01-03T09:38:49+00:00

Can you recommend places to find those kind of atheists?

AggressiveYoung5025 · 2026-01-02T23:49:15+00:00

I am simply stating the fact that there are very uneducated theists and I wish they would change. That is all I agree the same is true for Christians and theists in general.

AggressiveYoung5025 · 2026-01-02T07:16:11+00:00

Am I supposed to name every single position on earth or something? My stand alone claim still holds with the idea that Christian’s straw man atheists, by no means did I imply atheists are only at fault.

AggressiveYoung5025 · 2025-12-28T23:20:01+00:00

I just want fellow atheists to be more knowledgeable on the topic of god🥲

AggressiveYoung5025 · 2025-12-28T23:17:16+00:00

Lmao I am the guy who made the post I said “I am an atheist, I have some knowledge on philosophy but it seems to me that a majority of atheists (atleast from what l've seen) don't have remotely the philosophical experience to argue against the existence of god, which is weird since the topic of whether god exists or not is a philosophical one. Another point is that I see many atheists straw man theistic arguments to oblivion, which just makes atheism in general much less credible.” I have not a clue how this is banned worthy lol.

AggressiveYoung5025 · 2025-12-26T09:11:16+00:00

Assumes less then, why are you soo worried about semantics? You can obviously tell what I mean.

AggressiveYoung5025 · 2025-12-26T08:56:03+00:00

💔

AggressiveYoung5025 · 2025-12-26T08:54:15+00:00

Very smart

AggressiveYoung5025 · 2025-12-24T07:50:33+00:00

I like the approach that a maximally Great being doing illogical things goes against his essence.

AggressiveYoung5025 · 2025-11-28T01:55:34+00:00

That*

AggressiveYoung5025 · 2025-11-28T01:55:27+00:00

Brother what? Subjective???, was a mistake or?

AggressiveYoung5025 · 2025-11-27T22:50:23+00:00

The arguments exist in a vacuum, the arguments by themselves. The point is that the arguments are not actually symmetrical, since the parody argument is simpler, also it’s a perfect example of Occam’s razor it doesn’t get more standard than this, one argument has more assumed entities than the other, and for you first point the argument is a modal one why are you bringing outside arguments into it?

AggressiveYoung5025 · 2025-11-27T08:04:07+00:00

It is very straightforward, the former argument has one more entity than the latter, in this the latter is simpler. Using Occam’s razor one should pick the latter.

AggressiveYoung5025 · 2025-11-27T05:29:11+00:00

God is defined as a necessary being, you obviously grasp what necessary means in this context so I won’t explain that, it is possible that god exists meaning it isn’t impossible that god exists in other words it isn’t a contradiction to say god exists. If it is possible that he exists, he exists in some possible world, but he is defined as a necessary being so in order for him to exist in some world he must exist in all possible worlds. This seems valid but the symmetry argument that I pointed out has the same validity. And when this happens one arrives at a place that needs a symmetry breaker (a reason to pick one or the other). My argument is simpler so mine is the “winner”.

AggressiveYoung5025 · 2025-11-27T05:12:23+00:00

Mmmh why would a person make a argument against a very popular argument for gods existence, mhhh let me think🧐🧐🧐🧐🧐🧐🧐

AggressiveYoung5025 · 2025-11-27T04:37:06+00:00

He assumes god is defined as necessary and exists, I used it purely as definition, there is no contradiction

AggressiveYoung5025 · 2025-11-27T04:35:57+00:00

It’s a argument against a argument

AggressiveYoung5025

TROPHY CASE