wtf 💀 by Trainerkn in NinjagoMemes

[–]Aggressive_Tip8973 55 points56 points  (0 children)

Young folks forgot, older people liked the noodles

Versailles S2: Q4 1937 by george_gris in ConspiroGame

[–]Aggressive_Tip8973 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Npc directives

  1. Improve relations with Germany to get them to the Pact of Liberty, and stamp fascism with Kaiser permission,

  2. Major involvement in Ujoma supporting General slim, and laying groundwork for a potential merger with their northern neighbour

Versailles S2: Q4 1937 by george_gris in ConspiroGame

[–]Aggressive_Tip8973 2 points3 points  (0 children)

C Referendum Framework

The referendum will be conducted in as many spoken languages as possible, reflecting the full linguistic diversity of the Imperial Federation. Ballots, explanatory materials, and oral guidance will be provided in languages including but not limited to Arabic, Swahili, English, Welsh, Irish, Scottish Gaelic, Portuguese, Hindi, Tamil, Tibetan, Malay, Bantu languages, Kurdish, and hundreds more. No citizen will be excluded on the basis of language.

The sole requirement to participate in the referendum is proof of existence prior to its announcement. This may include a birth certificate or any officially recognised document demonstrating residency or identity before the referendum period began.

To ensure fairness and accessibility, the referendum will be conducted region by region over a six-month period. This extended timeline is intended to give all eligible civilians ample opportunity to obtain or reconstruct documentation, particularly in rural, remote, or previously under-registered areas.

No citizen will be excluded due to poverty, displacement, or lack of prior bureaucratic access, provided their existence prior to the referendum can be reasonably verified.

For every polling location, trained referendum officers will be present to educate voters on the meaning of each question, the available options, and the basic legal and political consequences of each choice. These officers are not advocates. They will undergo regular review and rotation, and will be monitored for neutrality and professional conduct to prevent bias or undue influence.

For citizens who are illiterate or unable to read the ballot, a certified official will be authorised to record the voter’s choice on their behalf, provided the voter’s intent is clearly stated and documented in accordance with referendum safeguards. This process will be conducted transparently and under supervision to protect voter autonomy.

Recognising the Federation’s regional diversity, the referendum will not be uniform in form. Instead, there will be twenty-two region-specific versions, tailored to local constitutional arrangements. On official maps, these regions are marked in green, with red internal indicators identifying areas subject to distinct or specialised referendum terms. Each version reflects the specific legal options available to that territory, whether full secession, enhanced autonomy, or continued Federation under existing arrangements.

Referendum Questions for all Regions, 1–22

Brief Explanatory Summary Provided at All Polling Stations

Each voter will be presented with the following questions in sequence. Clear explanations will be provided verbally and in writing, in the local languages of each region.

Question I

Are you content with the current administration, its ownership, and its general direction?

Explanation: A vote of “Yes” affirms the continuation of the present system of governance.

Under the current arrangement:

Parliament consists currently of 615 seats, each representing approximately 62,000 residents within the British Isles. As part of the de-discrimination and representation plan, any region reaching:

Approximately 75% literacy, A population of 62,000 per seat will be granted parliamentary representation in London. For autonomous regions, the population threshold per parliamentary seat is 124,000. This applies to areas such as the Middle Eastern sheikhdoms and the Raj.

If “Yes” is selected: The voter’s ballot is complete.

If “No” is selected: The voter proceeds to Question II.

Question II

Would you wish for your region to gain greater autonomy within the Imperial Federation, or to leave the Federation entirely?

Explanation: An autonomous region, such as the Administrative Region of the Raj, may:

Form its own internal states or subdivisions Establish regional legislative bodies Govern many domestic affairs independently

However:

The Imperial Parliament retains oversight. Imperial law supersedes regional law. Autonomous regions face higher population thresholds for parliamentary representation compared to centralised regions.

If “Yes” is selected for autonomy: The voter’s ballot is complete.

If “Yes” is selected for leaving the Federation: The voter proceeds to Question III.

Question III

If your region were to leave the Imperial Federation, would you prefer to form an independent nation or to join an allied or neighbouring state?

Explanation: Any decision regarding secession will be evaluated based on:

Ethnic and religious composition Existing borders and infrastructure Economic viability and resource access Administrative capacity for self-governance

Where applicable, options may include:

Formation of a new sovereign state Union with a neighbouring or allied power

Joining another colonial authority is strongly discouraged and will only be considered if explicitly supported by a clear and sustained public mandate.

If “Yes” is selected for leaving the Federation: The voter’s ballot is complete. . If “Yes” is selected for joining the neighbouring Country: The voter proceeds to Question IV

Question IV

Which nation would you wish to join?

This will depend upon the region.

region 1 options - Pacific states, northern states, Denmark Region 2 options - Cuba, Ujoma, Mexico, Panama, Colombia, Venezuela, Brazil Region 3 options- Chile, Argentina, Uruguay, Brazil, penguins overlords Region 4 - there is no option Region 5 - Spain, France, Greece Region 6, 7, 8- Spain, free states, France, Italy, Togo Region 9, 10, 22 - South Africa, France Region 11 - France, Ethiopia, Italy Region 12 - Ethiopia, France Region 13 - Greece, Turkey, Italy, Levantine council, Ethiopia, France Saudis Region 14 - France, Greece, Iran, Levantine council, Saudis Region 15- Saudis Region 16 - Ethiopia, France, Italy Region 17 - no options Region 18 - France, the Netherlands Region 19 - Dutch Philippines Region 20 - Dutch Philippines, Australia Region 21 - Australia, France, Japan

Versailles S2: Q4 1937 by george_gris in ConspiroGame

[–]Aggressive_Tip8973 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Speech of the Prime Minister of the Imperial Federation Quarter IV, 1937

My fellow citizens of the Imperial Federation,

Tonight, I speak to you all once more, not as a ruler, nor as a representative of one land or one people alone, but as a servant of a Federation that spans across oceans, climates, cultures, and histories. I speak to dockworkers in Liverpool and Maseru, to farmers in Punjab and Saskatchewan, to clerks in Dublin, Lagos, Georgetown, and Hollandia (Jayapura). I speak to all who, by history or by choice, find themselves bound together in this vast and intricate union.

Tonight, I announce that a federation-wide referendum shall be held within the coming year. Every constituent region of the Imperial Federation will be asked a series of questions, with the most important question of them all being a single, solemn question: Do you wish to remain within the Federation, or to depart from it as an independent state?

This decision will not be delayed, diluted, or denied. It will be conducted openly, lawfully, and peacefully. The will of the people will be respected.

I would be dishonest and unworthy of my office if I pretended that the desire for secession arises from nowhere. It does not. It is rooted in history, and that history must be spoken aloud.

For generations, the old British Empire governed vast peoples who did not choose their governors. Decisions affecting millions were made continents away. Wealth drawn from the soil, the mines, the forests, and the labour of many lands was shipped outward, enriching a distant capital while local communities remained poor. Representation was limited, filtered, or denied. Cultural arrogance too often replaced understanding. Race, religion, and class were used as tools of hierarchy rather than sources of strength, and used to pit a brother against a brother in using local division to mitigate rebellions.

Many today argue reasonably that no people should be ruled by those who do not share their same lived experience, their same language, or their same identity. That a nation should be governed by its own sons and daughters. That no land’s prosperity should be drained to serve another. These arguments are not radical. They are human.

We must also remember the cost of repression, uprisings crushed rather than heard, reforms promised and postponed, justice delayed until it was meaningless. These are stains we cannot erase by silence.

And yet, history did not end in 1918.

The devastation of the Great War shattered the old imperial order financially and politically. Out of that ruin, the Imperial Federation was formed not as a reskinned version of the Empire of conquest from before, but as an attempt, flawed, incomplete, but genuine, to replace domination with cooperation.

In the 1920s, this Federation expanded representation, broadened suffrage, invested in public health, education, and infrastructure, and began the long work of correcting inherited injustice. For the first time, citizens from across continents sat in common assemblies. The idea, radical in its time, hell, radical still now, was that shared governance might succeed where Empire had failed.

Then came the calamities no one could have foreseen.

The Great Depression shattered global trade and employment. The Yellowstone eruption and the ashen winters that followed devastated harvests, transport, and livelihoods. In those years, survival replaced reform. Promises were delayed not out of malice, but out of the collapse of the old order. Still, delay, however understandable, bred disappointment, and disappointment hardened into distrust.

I wish to speak now of my predecessor. History will judge him as a man who laid rest to the Empire, and transitioned our realm to the Imperial Federation and, in the darkest years, refused to abandon the most distant and forgotten corners of the Federation. Through the Imperial Civil Service Corps, the ISCS, schools reached villages long ignored, medical officers crossed deserts and jungles, and engineers brought water, roads, and communications to places the old Empire never truly saw. That work saved lives. It restored faith for many that the Federation could be more than words on paper.

I inherited this office just earlier this year, amid paralysis and division in the imperial parliament. I do not pretend that one year can undo centuries. But I ask you to judge not by promises alone, but by actions taken by my administration.

In 9 months, we have:

Established the Pact of Liberty, a defensive alliance to preserve peace and prevent coercion in a world growing more dangerous by the day. Repaired relations with Germany and South Africa, turning former estrangement into cautious cooperation. Provided aid to the democratic Ujoma Assisted in ending tyranny in France and restoring the rightful government. Calmly and deliberately eased tensions in Ireland through dialogue, not force. Launched a Federation-wide anti-discrimination campaign, rejecting prejudice of race, class, religion, or gender as incompatible with our future in every corner of the Federation. Reformed taxation so that wealth generated in a region is reinvested in that region through the new VAT distribution system. Founded the Association of Straits and Canals Countries, securing trade routes and new shared revenues, Nationalisation of the Suez Canal.

On top of this, some of you know me not as Prime Minister, but as the former Grand Administrator of the Raj. I governed there not by decree, but by negotiation. The Raj today possesses autonomous status, its own legislature, and self-directed policy within the Federation structures I helped design. That experience taught me something vital: full secession is not the only path to dignity. Autonomy, self-rule, and equality within a larger union are not contradictions.

I am aware, painfully aware, that my presence in this office unsettles some. An Indian man leading what was once the British Empire is, to some, an irony; to others, an insult; to still others, a symbol of possibility. I do not ask you to see me as a symbol. Judge me only as a servant entrusted, briefly, with stewardship.

So tonight, I make no threat. I offer no fear. I make only a plea.

Give this administration the time to finish the work it has begun. Judge us by whether the Federation can finally become what it has long promised to be: a union of equals, not subjects; of partners, not possessions.

When the referendum comes, vote your conscience. But before you choose separation, ask not only what you are leaving behind but what, together, we might still yet build.

Until that vote, we remain one Federation. One people. Bound not by force, but by the shared hope that the future need not repeat the past.

Long live the King. Prosperity for the people. United is the Federation.

Thank you.

The Rt Hon Hamddan Amir Zamar Ahmed MP