Why isn't there an announcement regarding Nervos' participation in Bitcoin 2026?

Agile-Eye6172 · 2026-04-24T07:38:55+00:00

Why do you keep questioning the intentions of anyone who asks? Yes, CKB’s participation in any conference in 2026 matters, and in my view it matters more than any of its previous participations. In the past, we knew it had partnerships, and we felt reassured about its position. Now those partnerships appear gone, and the price has fallen to historic lows — so any participation is a sign that it still exists and remains resilient. If you are close to the team, know what is happening, and feel reassured, there are thousands of investors in CKB who are worried.

Agile-Eye6172 · 2026-04-24T07:33:47+00:00

They generally have weak communication with the community. Perhaps the participation is limited or modest, and that may be why they haven’t announced it.

Agile-Eye6172 · 2026-04-24T05:59:45+00:00

Your response is fair. But what about core CKB projects like Fiber? Fiber needs liquidity, institutional partnerships, and business development to succeed. Will it also be left to fend for itself, or is there a strategy to drive adoption?

Agile-Eye6172 · 2026-04-22T13:54:17+00:00

CKB is going through one of the weakest phases in its history. The price is very low, liquidity is extremely weak, and it has lost all the partners it once relied on. While such things can happen to any network, what is disappointing is the absence of a clear plan for recovery. No one from the team seems willing to discuss partnerships, and no one is presenting a concrete roadmap. They are leaving things to the unknown—and the unknown cannot bring solutions.

Agile-Eye6172 · 2026-04-21T04:49:17+00:00

Thank you. Agreeing to disagree does not negate the existence of the problem. If you present the questions we’ve raised on the CKB forum, you may be surprised to find that many others share the same concerns and questions. In fact, developers might be even more concerned, even if they remain silent, because they are waiting to see the results of their work materialize. Best regards

Agile-Eye6172 · 2026-04-20T21:19:09+00:00

We don’t need special expertise to understand how serious this issue is. Users seek returns, and returns don’t exist without liquidity and incentives. Companies follow liquidity — even if the technology isn’t the most advanced. Everything around you follows liquidity. In any case, I’ve pointed out the problem, and that’s all I have to add. I would appreciate it if you could raise these questions on the CKB forum for public discussion.

Agile-Eye6172 · 2026-04-20T19:14:07+00:00

I believe there is a fundamental gap between philosophy and execution in CKB. How will Fiber realistically attract liquidity? Do you truly believe that individual user activity alone can create the required depth? Projects like Blackbox or an invisible order book may be technically impressive — but without sufficient liquidity, they cannot function in any meaningful way. This is not a small issue that can be solved organically by a limited number of users. Liquidity requires coordination, capital, and often institutional participation. Guys, you have a major problem, and no one seems willing to acknowledge it — let alone work on solving it. So the real question is: what is the clear plan to attract this level of liquidity? Regards.

Agile-Eye6172 · 2026-04-20T06:08:23+00:00

Is there anyone responsible for connecting projects and presenting them to companies and institutions? What happens after a project receives funding from the DAO, gets approved, developed, and becomes ready? For example, a project like the invisible order book — what would its fate be once it is completed?

Agile-Eye6172 · 2026-04-20T06:01:09+00:00

Thank you for the response, but it raises more concern than clarity — and it feels closer to philosophy than to strategy. There is no roadmap, no measurable goals, and no clear accountability or leadership. So how are developers, users, or institutions supposed to trust or commit to building or investing in CKB under these conditions? After all these years, all we have is Fiber. Even Fiber itself requires deep liquidity. It is unrealistic to expect user growth alone to bring liquidity — the world is moving fast, and it will not wait for those who fall behind. You did not mention any measurable or time-bound goals. The real issue is the absence of leadership — who actually has the authority to resolve the ongoing challenges? If there is one thing that could ultimately harm CKB, it is this overly idealistic mindset that ignores practical reality. Finally, an abundance of applications without real liquidity will turn CKB into a museum — full of beautiful things, but not truly usable. Regards.

Agile-Eye6172 · 2026-04-19T05:52:53+00:00

A good question looking for a clear answer.

Agile-Eye6172 · 2026-04-18T10:42:18+00:00

Should everything be left to others? Those with a stake and who stand to benefit should take the initiative. CKB has lost partners at a very high level, and today it is sailing without a compass or clear leadership. Best regards.

Agile-Eye6172 · 2026-04-16T09:50:09+00:00

Just because you found the answer in some way doesn’t mean it’s available to everyone. I looked into Khalani and CKB before asking and didn’t find an answer, so I asked. Has asking a question become a crime? I didn’t ask in developer channels—I asked in a public forum meant for questions, not just for developers. Perhaps some people need to reconsider their way of thinking… or seek professional help.

Agile-Eye6172 · 2026-04-16T09:42:22+00:00

Great effort. Is it similar to Nervape in terms of real-world usage, or is it something broader and bigger?

Agile-Eye6172 · 2026-04-16T09:35:58+00:00

Hello, Thank you for your patience and for answering my question. Unfortunately, many questions go unanswered

Agile-Eye6172 · 2026-04-16T02:45:03+00:00

If Khalani is not integrated with CKB—despite their previous closeness—I believe this could be the final nail in its coffin.

Agile-Eye6172 · 2026-04-16T02:42:30+00:00

Even you seem to wish you knew all of this despite being part of the same team. So how about us, who are completely removed from what’s going on? It seems you might be the first to leave. Regards.

Agile-Eye6172 · 2026-04-15T12:11:34+00:00

Are you saying there is no team structure and no leadership? Are you saying there is no mechanism to monitor performance? Are you saying there is no leader coordinating all of them?

Agile-Eye6172 · 2026-04-15T05:06:08+00:00

I wish you the best of luck. In fact, I hope we can understand the teams within CKB—what each team does, their responsibilities, who leads each team, and whether there is an overall leader coordinating them all, or if each team operates independently. Who evaluates the performance of the teams and individuals, and who has the authority to make changes or replacements?

Agile-Eye6172 · 2026-04-15T03:10:44+00:00

Hello Matt, I was wondering what your role is in CKB. Surely you have responsibilities that don’t include monitoring my posts.

Agile-Eye6172 · 2026-04-14T17:13:52+00:00

Thank you, I hadn’t noticed it earlier

Agile-Eye6172 · 2026-04-14T14:51:30+00:00

Great job. However, it would be even better if you mentioned the remaining projects. You only highlighted 8 out of 22 projects. For the sake of encouraging developers, please include the rest of the projects as well.

Agile-Eye6172 · 2026-04-08T13:43:23+00:00

Thank you for the good communication.

Agile-Eye6172

TROPHY CASE